Comments on: The effect of police body-cams

By: Tatterdemalian

Tatterdemalian — Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:16:25 +0000

And, as predictably as the sun shall rise, body cams are racist again.

By: Ymar Sakar

Ymar Sakar — Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:59:06 +0000

Dave Says:
October 21st, 2017 at 3:39 pm

Leftists, the police unions, the mayors of various Demoncrat fortress fiefdom cities, and the mafia/gangs, all work together.

Don’t worry, they have a plan.

By: Ymar Sakar

Ymar Sakar — Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:56:02 +0000

DC is so corrupt, you can probably just take it on faith that they faked the stats.

DC doesn’t need body cameras, because they need to execute Americans on demand, otherwise they can’t protect Congress critters. Remember that incident when the DC SS killed off some black woman and grabbed the child that was in the car, because they said she was running barricades? She wasn’t running barricades, they lied about that one. Congress cheered and clapped though, so that was good.

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:39:11 +0000

If America was never great then why do liberals like to preach to us that we need to be more compassionate like we are a great country or something, why don’t liberals take their lectures to other also never great countries like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan and preach their values there.

By: Tatterdemalian

Tatterdemalian — Sat, 21 Oct 2017 03:13:33 +0000

We went through this once already.

1. Cops beat Rodney King
2. Someone recorded it
3. Riots lead to calls for all officers to wear bodycams
4. Bodycams distributed
5. Footage shows criminals clearly threatening officers, even putting them in danger
6. Bodycams taken away, because they keep recording things #BLM don’t want them to, and DAS RACIS

By: Geoffrey Britain

Geoffrey Britain — Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:53:00 +0000

Dave,

Publicizing false accusations to create greater public awareness, while worthwhile is not nearly enough. There must be consequence and it must be proportional to the offense.

At the very least, that’s obstruction of justice and they should go to prison regardless of whether the criminal offense for which they were arrested, results in imprisonment or even is prosecuted. Same thing for false rape accusations. The accuser should be receive the same sentence as does a real rapist.

There’s a profound reason why “bearing false witness” is prohibited in the Ten Commandments.

By: groundhog

groundhog — Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:17:30 +0000

neocon says Just think how valuable that might be in spousal arguments!

I guess you haven’t met the spouse who gets twice as mad if you show them they’re wrong.

: ]

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:45:15 +0000

I am so sick and tried of liberals picking out one very rare incident and blow it up to portray it as a trend to push their deceptive agenda.

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:43:34 +0000

how about do it both way, whenever anyone who’s lies of police brutality got debunked by a body camera will be put on the front page of New York Times to let the country knows how often do criminals lie about being unfair treated by police.

By: Ken Mitchell

Ken Mitchell — Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:38:34 +0000

One thing that certainly needs to happen is that whenever a police officer is involved in a shooting, if the body-cam was somehow “turned off” or was never turned on, the onus should be on the officer to prove what happened – and the citizen should be believed. Too many – and “one” would be too many – officers fail to turn on their cameras before engaging the suspects/citizens.

I’d recommend that the cameras be on at ALL times.