I think your comment is on the wrong thread; should be on the Bertrand Russell thread.

At any rate, you are quite incorrect that it’s been established that Lenin had syphilis. Not at all (see this, and there are many other articles saying similar things as to why it was unlikely Lenin had syphilis).

When Russell saw Lenin it was 1920, and Russell seemed to think he quite lucid and not compromised at all in the cognitive sense. Lenin had not yet had the strokes that debilitated him and ultimately killed him; he suffered the first one in 1922

Lenin’s father had died of stroke at about the same age. In addition “there was no evidence of [syphilis] on autopsy, and Lenin’s syphilis test was said to have been negative.” There’s also an unconfirmed theory that Stalin poisoned him.

But syphilis is not only not a certainty, it’s not even likely.

It is perhaps unremarkable that a people that can’t survive alone, does this out of fear and dependence.

A health organization is led by strong and wise alphas. But sooner or later, the people become crazy and weak enough to put up a trash king, which requires some hero to replace.

The fact tha Moscow has flatly admitted that Lenin died of syphilis counts for naught.

By the time that Russell met Lenin — he was FAR GONE.

Deal with THAT.

That’s reality.

Like late-war Adolf’s ‘logic’ this is the brain of a totally diseased critter.

By the late teens, Lenin was in Fourth stage Syphilis.

EVERYTHING he ever said must be considered in that light.

His health condition is beyond dispute, BTW.

As is Adolf’s.

Hitler, like Lenin, had the Number One physician knowledgeable in syphilis in his direct (final) employ.

WHAT a coincidence.

Other famous syphlitics: Napoleon and Churchill’s father.

It rots the brain.

So STOP talking about how ‘reasoned’ Lenin was.

My cat could do better.

Hollywood is much worse than what people imagine. The Left is much more evil than people want to imagine or accept.

Combine Polanski with Harvey, the Left can’t get any worse right? Oh, yea it can, it already did.

They are only unbeatable until a god (or sennen) kills them.

Some of us have been waiting decades if not longer, for Americans to “wake up” to the true nature of the Left.

They still think it is some kind of political problem that can be solved with elections due to political disagreements that they will fight for.

Andrew Breitbart probably already knew or suspected it about Hollywood. People like me would have already informed him out of it, and of course Breitbart was originally connected to Democrat organs so he had wind of it there.

As for your point, it is close, but the conclusion won’t happen so easily.

All those billions will mostly go to the lawyers, not the victims. Which means the Lawyer Unions, what they call the bar associations, will funnel the money back into the Left via money laundering.

Are Evangelists and conservatives so poor, or so stupid, that they can’t buy some Republicans in DC to get rid of this tax exemption?

It would produce a lot more funding for social security and welfare… oh wait, I forgot, Leftists don’t pay out of their own pocket for those programs. They take it out of yours.

Except for one thing—an out–of-court settlement is not an admission of guilt. In fact, sometimes corporations settle even when someone is innocent, because it costs less that way. People in power sometimes are falsely accused. If brother Bob knew about the settlements, he may have told himself that this is what was going on.

“Restraint of Trade” RICO liability WRT “Harvey the Hutt” is going to cause Hollywood — and by extension a lot of Leftist Democratic candidates — a lot of “Out of Money Moments” very soon.

See:

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2017/10/15/they-all-knew-courtney-love-banned-by-powerful-hollywood-agency-for-calling-out-weinstein/