It’s not political, because he left no political statement.

If he was trying to act as a crusader for gun control, why was he buying guns as early as 1982?

Look at his earlier Las Vegas target – the “Life is beautiful” concert. He was an abusive old man who took delight in manipulating people (look at his treatment of his girlfriend, and his pride in being a winning gambler). He was old and certainly reaching that age where he realized “it’s all over soon” anyway. It was time to go out while he was still in his prime. If he could get away, then good. If not, he was able to deface history with a mark that would cause pain for a hundred years as people pass about stories of “the greatest massacre in US history”.

Elizabeth Smart once noted that her rapist and kidnapper, got really excited about porn journals he brought home to experiment with.

Given my background, talking to ex cons and criminals isn’t such a shocking issue, since my original training was designed to counter terrorists or suicidal fanatics. Somebody that just wants to stab you in the back because you “dissed” him is relatively low on the threat scale there. You just have to kill them, or at least communicate in a way they can understand that you aren’t like other human sheep walking around…

So the dismorphic “fear” that is generated amongst the West, where you keep these criminals in jail to protect society from them… in my pov, the criminal is in jail to protect them from people like me, not the other way around. As a result, having me interview people like Ted Bundy and introduce the various subjects that people here claim they don’t understand, would be pretty enlightening and entertaining. Sociopaths and body language Master Manipulators, can manipulate average people very well. But they can’t do so when they don’t understand my research very well.

As for Ted Bundy’s purported intelligence… he is merely average to me. The things we have discovered since his death, far overshadows whatever temporary or Normalized edge he had over the Average American.

The State Controls people by presenting bogeymen and saying “Obey Us Or Else you will fall to the devils and villains”. For the Japanese, it was the Western colonialists fighting against Asian Prosperity. For the Germans, it was the fiendish Semites (only a certain type of Semite, Arabs and Kurds not included).

Many of the serial killers in US history, the information on them has been filtered to the public via lawyers and main sewer media gateway keepers… and people can probably guess how far I can trust those types.

That is why, if only too late at this stage, we should all reanalyze the “truths” the State has fed us. If only because in the future, there’ll be even more mass killers to deal with.

Sergey Says:
October 7th, 2017 at 12:33 pm

Following what Sergey noted, spiritual possession, known in the West as demonic possession, is well documented in many countries and cultures. In fact, Voodoo, medicine using tribes for spiritual contact, often intentionally open the gates to be possessed by spirits, in order to obtain power, knowledge, or spells. This is perhaps better known as “spiritual mediums” in the US. Although it is not exactly the same thing.

There are two primary types of spirits. Angels and demons (not the same thing), that can influence a person’s actions or directly control them, if the soul-body-mind connection ever becomes weak enough. This is why certain religious sects don’t drink alcohol or use drugs. It interrupts the soul-body connection.

People can check other similar cases, such as the sleep paralysis Shadow Man observations of various people. There’s even a wiki article about it.

Many sociopaths and psychopaths, are very logical with an above average IQ.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=5UttN4WL3xY

I wouldn’t go so far to point the cause to be A or Z. In the West, we look for, because we are conditioned to do this, psychological or medical reasons based on Western anatomy. In the East and other countries, spiritual causes are also analyzed and not discounted as much.

I synergize the two prototypical point of views.

Also, demons in the Western concept, are fallen angels basically. That is incorrect. Demons are the banished or disembodied spirits of Nephiliim, giants basically, like the tribes Israel wiped our Goliath. Their cannibalism, aggression, and other tendencies, are still with those spirits, yet they lack a body to express those instincts now.

The common Western conception is that Ted Bundy is playing to an audience, but for a sociopath or psychopath, catering to your persecutors at the end of your life just seems like a big waste of time. Someone that paid no attention to your human laws and human mercy and conceptions of that kind of conditioning, would go out of his way to come up with deception and self deception to play out a final “I’m human just like you” may be his way to have a final game or laugh, but to me it is just a waste of time.

Someone that thought like a superior hunter as Ted, for example, against women, would be rather foolish, after coming all this way, to kneel down and bow before human morality and laws, one last time. A waste of time. If he wanted to preserve his life, he should have just avoided this issue to begin with. Which implies that he couldn’t control himself. Yet if he can’t control himself, how is he putting on an act when I’m analyzing his body language?

It is easily explained by external mind control influences, but not if the person was always there.

People thought the same about Snowden, btw, that he was a sociopath or psychopath traitor. I read his interview and read his body language, and came to a different point of view early days. Indeed, one would have to be a sociopath to given up his American citizenship and moral circles just to stick it to the “Man”…, especially since Man Cia would just drone bomb you once you outside the US or via extradition or extraordinary rendition.

I don’t like leftists’ politics, but I am not going to do away with myself in order to achieve an embarrassment for them. It is possible that Stein’s correspondent has stumbled on the true motivation, but the correspondent hasn’t proven it. By the way, I have always admired Steyn’s thinking; I don’t in this case.

Again, this attempting to provide the “only possible explanation” is just crap at this point. I wish people would stop trying to prove that they are as expert as the FBI in providing the one true explanation. It just proves the ambition of the writer, and it must be at least annoying to the families of the dead.

Thanks for the link.

Best analysis yet.

Mark Steyn’s latest post has the most plausible explanation I have yet read of Paddock’s motivation: “Theory of the Case”
https://www.steynonline.com/8162/theory-of-the-case

If the perpetrator yields no clues, look to the nature of the victims.

Yes, Paddock had originally planned on attacking another venue. If gun control was his object, then he must of thought that his earlier plans failing to materialize was ‘for the best’ after all. As “the gentleman from the London Think Tank” points out, the slaughter both horrifies and as defenders of “gun rights” they also had it coming… since they “enable” gun violence… If so, Paddock saw it as a “twofer”.

Evil must always justify itself.