<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Conservatism and tyranny	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:57:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Conservatism and tyranny &#124; Politics You All		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2261577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conservatism and tyranny &#124; Politics You All]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2261577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Continue reading at this SOURCE [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Continue reading at this SOURCE [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoffrey Britain		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Britain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ymar Sakar, 

I wasn&#039;t suggesting that atheists are the root of the problem. Merely pointing out the contradiction, which I have yet to see an atheist acknowledge. Undoubtedly because it is for them an inconvenient truth best ignored. 

Though as of late I am more and more convinced that the cultural struggle in America is at base a spiritual one. 

And though many on the Left will deny it, especially liberals willfully blind to the repercussions of what they support, as in order to support the Left&#039;s philosophical premises, it is  necessary to reject key aspects of reality and, in that rejection of the &lt;i&gt;principles&lt;/i&gt; of his creation... they implicitely reject God.

Here I believe is the key realization that extends from that perception: having rejected God, they seek to reshape mankind in &lt;i&gt;their&lt;/i&gt; image... which BTW is exactly what Lucifer is about.

Finally, a word of constructive advice, worry not how clear another may or may not be, worry only at how you have yet to attain even greater clarity. 

I do, yet the clearer I get, the farther I realize I have yet to travel. Humility is the doorway to wisdom. It is only as I approach old age that I see that the wise man is the most humble of men for he sees most clearly, how far up the mountain lies the summit. Namaste.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ymar Sakar, </p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t suggesting that atheists are the root of the problem. Merely pointing out the contradiction, which I have yet to see an atheist acknowledge. Undoubtedly because it is for them an inconvenient truth best ignored. </p>
<p>Though as of late I am more and more convinced that the cultural struggle in America is at base a spiritual one. </p>
<p>And though many on the Left will deny it, especially liberals willfully blind to the repercussions of what they support, as in order to support the Left&#8217;s philosophical premises, it is  necessary to reject key aspects of reality and, in that rejection of the <i>principles</i> of his creation&#8230; they implicitely reject God.</p>
<p>Here I believe is the key realization that extends from that perception: having rejected God, they seek to reshape mankind in <i>their</i> image&#8230; which BTW is exactly what Lucifer is about.</p>
<p>Finally, a word of constructive advice, worry not how clear another may or may not be, worry only at how you have yet to attain even greater clarity. </p>
<p>I do, yet the clearer I get, the farther I realize I have yet to travel. Humility is the doorway to wisdom. It is only as I approach old age that I see that the wise man is the most humble of men for he sees most clearly, how far up the mountain lies the summit. Namaste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: n.n		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260684</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n.n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reconciliation and synthesis of a fitness function to order our evolution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reconciliation and synthesis of a fitness function to order our evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: n.n		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n.n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is value in liberal, progressive, and conservative philosophies and schools of thought.  There are overlapping and converging paths leading to the same destination.  Some more distant than others.  Some with known and predicted risks.  Thus the need and opportunity for reconciliation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is value in liberal, progressive, and conservative philosophies and schools of thought.  There are overlapping and converging paths leading to the same destination.  Some more distant than others.  Some with known and predicted risks.  Thus the need and opportunity for reconciliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: n.n		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260677</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n.n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260677</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see... PM = principles matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; PM = principles matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: n.n		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n.n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The problem with atheism, agnosticism, and many forms of theism is that they are based or prone to conflation of logical domains, and absence or corruption of religious/moral principles.  In fact, the separation and appreciation of logical domains, advised by God in Genesis, no less, is in part the cause for Western (e.g. Judaic, Christian) civilization&#039;s meteoric rise to enjoy a first-world stature.

Liberalism is divergent (e.g. generational), which creates an illusion of tolerance.

Progressivism is monotonic, unqualified change, forward and backward.

Conservatism, American conservatism, is a conservation of principles.

PP = principles matter.  PP = Planned Parenthood, is its antithesis.

Reconciliation. Rehabilitation. Revitalization.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with atheism, agnosticism, and many forms of theism is that they are based or prone to conflation of logical domains, and absence or corruption of religious/moral principles.  In fact, the separation and appreciation of logical domains, advised by God in Genesis, no less, is in part the cause for Western (e.g. Judaic, Christian) civilization&#8217;s meteoric rise to enjoy a first-world stature.</p>
<p>Liberalism is divergent (e.g. generational), which creates an illusion of tolerance.</p>
<p>Progressivism is monotonic, unqualified change, forward and backward.</p>
<p>Conservatism, American conservatism, is a conservation of principles.</p>
<p>PP = principles matter.  PP = Planned Parenthood, is its antithesis.</p>
<p>Reconciliation. Rehabilitation. Revitalization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: n.n		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n.n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A conservation of principles.   Religious/moral, including individual dignity and intrinsic value.  Natural (i.e. fitness function) and personal imperatives.  Go forth and reconcile.

That said, BLM = Baby Lives Matter... throughout our evolution from conception.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A conservation of principles.   Religious/moral, including individual dignity and intrinsic value.  Natural (i.e. fitness function) and personal imperatives.  Go forth and reconcile.</p>
<p>That said, BLM = Baby Lives Matter&#8230; throughout our evolution from conception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frog		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260640</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 03:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Never before saw Kyndle&#039;s post, am glad I see it now.
jvermeer and GB are on the same page.

As to Ymar, he is succinct and clear only in his own mind. Sometimes oblique and sometimes tangential. There seems to be a loose screw rattling around in there. I wish that were not so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never before saw Kyndle&#8217;s post, am glad I see it now.<br />
jvermeer and GB are on the same page.</p>
<p>As to Ymar, he is succinct and clear only in his own mind. Sometimes oblique and sometimes tangential. There seems to be a loose screw rattling around in there. I wish that were not so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260626</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One takeaway is never, ever to believe what the left says they want.
Those who scoff at the idea of a slippery slope are usually trying to edge around behind you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One takeaway is never, ever to believe what the left says they want.<br />
Those who scoff at the idea of a slippery slope are usually trying to edge around behind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymar Sakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/09/26/conservatism-and-tyranny/#comment-2260621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymar Sakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 02:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=69896#comment-2260621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Succinct, erudite and quite perceptive.&lt;/b&gt;

How is something longer than what I write, succinct?

Is this perhaps a confusion between conciseness and clearness. 

On the latter aspect, people&#039;s subjective criteria will inform their judgment. In the case between equally long essays, the one people like more will be perceived as clearer and more important, thus shorter, while the longer one will appear on the categorical order of tl;dr.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Succinct, erudite and quite perceptive.</b></p>
<p>How is something longer than what I write, succinct?</p>
<p>Is this perhaps a confusion between conciseness and clearness. </p>
<p>On the latter aspect, people&#8217;s subjective criteria will inform their judgment. In the case between equally long essays, the one people like more will be perceived as clearer and more important, thus shorter, while the longer one will appear on the categorical order of tl;dr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
