I think the chances that Huma Abedin was cc’d on almost every email are close to 100%. I’d guess that at least some of those deleted 30K could be found among the 60K that Huma had saved off to her personal, shared laptop in a folder labeled “Insurance.”

It may well be that in addition to some foreign actors having Hillary’s emails, someone in the NYC police may have copies of the emails from Huma’s laptop. However, as long as people who threaten the Clintons keep mysteriously killing themselves/dying, they may only come to light after Hillary passes away.

What I’m trying to say is that raising a “what about” question over Clinton is reasonable to me because she is still considered the real winner by many resisters. Talking about her is very different from pulling someone out of the past to justify something Trump does or did. The people who supported Clinton ignored her behavior but pick on everything Trump has said or done. I think lots of Trump voters were probably votes against Hillary. There is nothing wrong with telling people why you didn’t support Hillary.
* * *
I’m not opposed to what-abouting when it goes to show the double-standards of the accusers, so long as one does not use it to justify the (alleged) actions of the accused — assuming, of course, that the (alleged) actions are reprehensible in the first place.

😉

And now there is this ridiculous hysteria over Russia and this alleged “collusion.” What we know for certain about Russia is that they were engaged in information gathering and persuasion, which is what all countries do. As for Trump, it is normal to look for damaging information about one’s political opponents, as it is simply what all campaigns do. This is all the more ironic, with the well-documented past record of the Clintons, the suspicion that Hillary Clinton may very well have other things to hide, and the fact that her campaign was willing to spend one billion dollars in an attempt to win the Presidency.

Have we already forgotten the 2000 campaign, where the news of George W. Bush’s DUI arrest was leaked by a Democrat operative just a few days before the election? Who else knew about that, and how long were they sitting on it? If there was anything like that about Mr. Trump out there, we would have surely heard about it in the 2016 campaign.

So far, the only real crimes in this whole affair have been Hillary Clinton’s secret e-mail server and her unilateral deletion of all those e-mails under subpoena, plus the ongoing leaks of classified information to the media (all very coincidentally designed to damage the Trump administration). James Comey was a hack and deserved to be fired. So far, Robert Mueller does not look very promising. Drain that swamp, Donald.

So Hillary = absolute certainty of guilt.
Trump Jr. = hypothetical guilt.

“Cornhead Says:
July 29th, 2016 at 3:16 pm
Correction. Sorensen.

Hillary is finished and she knows it. I’m sure I posted here that some foreign power hacked her private email server in real time. That foreign country has 33,000 of the deleted emails. I think the hacker is Israel. They just disguised themselves as Russia.

Russia knows that the Muslims own the Clintons. Look at who donated to the Clinton Foundation. And Israel could never match that oil money. The emails will expose the entire bribery scheme.

And what a pathetic speech by HRC. “I love children. I am a woman.” BFD. What have you ever done other than enrich yourself?”

Special Counsel Mueller should hire me. Ready for action!

If you are into the Beatles, 1967 and Sgt. Pepper’s….

expat: Agreed. I thought you were making a specific point about someone from 1967.