<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tips&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2017/05/17/tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/05/17/tips/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 22:15:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yancey Ward		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/05/17/tips/#comment-2210805</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yancey Ward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 22:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=68824#comment-2210805</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An excellent essay by Ms. Hemingway, and it reinforces a point I have made a lot on different sites- most people forget all the wrong stories we have seen since November.

Also, whenever you see &quot;anonymous sources said&quot; that are directly contradicted by the people who should know whether or not something is true, Occam&#039;s Razor requires you to give far more weight to the &lt;i&gt;known&lt;/i&gt; source since anonymous sources pay no reputational price for being caught in an error or an outright lie.  In addition, I think &lt;i&gt;a lot&lt;/i&gt; of these reporters don&#039;t actually have sources at all, but are actually in full blown fabrication mode.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent essay by Ms. Hemingway, and it reinforces a point I have made a lot on different sites- most people forget all the wrong stories we have seen since November.</p>
<p>Also, whenever you see &#8220;anonymous sources said&#8221; that are directly contradicted by the people who should know whether or not something is true, Occam&#8217;s Razor requires you to give far more weight to the <i>known</i> source since anonymous sources pay no reputational price for being caught in an error or an outright lie.  In addition, I think <i>a lot</i> of these reporters don&#8217;t actually have sources at all, but are actually in full blown fabrication mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.J.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/05/17/tips/#comment-2210759</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=68824#comment-2210759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mollie Hemingway is a one of the best in the business. Good stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mollie Hemingway is a one of the best in the business. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
