You do know about McCabe’s wife, right?

http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-bundlers-donated-to-wife-of-fbi-mccabe/

That document, that I reviewed also around the time it first came out, is absolutely fine and in the right spirit of disclosure.

HOWEVER, when the man campaigns as he has, making specific explicit promises, but doesn’t live up to them, something is very amiss.

But that is par for the course for a man who is so unusually mutable.

It just piles on to the rest of the reasons why trump cannot be trusted.

And without that, there is no credibility.

Without that, there is no building of support beyond those already willing to overlook it and cheer on even his reversals.

Without all the above, there is no lasting changes (assuming trump is going to make the changes we want and expect – turn right and return to the line about mutability above).
.

“If you read here frequently, you will learn to ignore him. I have.”

Indeed, you have.

No it is not. It is a straw man argument. Maybe, if it exists, the taping is secret from Spicer and almost all others. Maybe it does not exist, but of course Spicer cannot prove that; it MIGHT exist.
So it is a reasonably honest answer, pissing off Smith (whom I find left-biased) and Wallace (whom I find generally decent). Too effing bad their demands are not always met. They sure don’t spill their guts to us, so why should they expect any different response than “we don’t spill our guts on your command either”?

Transparency.

trump has, perhaps, complied with the letter of the law, but he has fallen short of delivering his own promises and standards on this.

For a man who campaigned on “Drain the Swamp”, who specifically said he’d release his tax returns once elected, who has an arm’s length structure with his businesses that essentially means “trust me”, and who has an uncomfortably close relationship with family members with unclear roles in his administration, all ignoring his mutability, it sure seems he doesn’t walk his talk.

Transparency builds trust.

trump’s refusal, legal as they may be, to live up to his own promises and standards creates mistrust.

I’ll make it easy for you. Here’s the link to Trumps 104-page financial disclosure statement. Now you go over it line-by-line, and tell us all the secret sauce you uncover:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2838696-Trump-2016-Financial-Disclosure.html

Now, about that atrocious act of cultural appropriation you just committed, from a banned movie no less…..wait, maybe two negatives cancel out and that makes it okay?
I really love that song.

This guy, not so much.

http://screencrush.com/song-of-the-south-racism/

pans the film, but concludes —
“I don’t think any of this was intentional. I believe that Disney saw Uncle Remus as an unequivocally positive character. Some critics have observed a kinship between Uncle Remus and “Uncle Walt” – men with an unshakeable belief in the power of stories who’ve dedicated their lives to entertaining and educating children. Although Johnny’s mother repeatedly orders Remus not to tell Johnny any more stories, those same stories eventually save Johnny’s life. At the end of the film, Remus’ words seem to heal Johnny after he’s suffered a potentially deadly injury. It’s very possible that Disney had good intentions – and still wound up with a very questionable movie.”

QED