<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: An alternative way to look at &#8220;alternative facts&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2017 00:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Henry Daniels		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2168791</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Daniels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2017 00:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2168791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Watching the video in which Ms. Conway used the famous phrase, one could pretty easily conclude she intended to say the facts were in dispute and Spicer was presenting the facts as the White House saw them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the video in which Ms. Conway used the famous phrase, one could pretty easily conclude she intended to say the facts were in dispute and Spicer was presenting the facts as the White House saw them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2168157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2168157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ben Says: 
January 25th, 2017 at 4:10 am
Bill Clinton was a popular president, who passed NAFTA, and won reelection.

Bill Clinton banged his intern, lied about it, and as a result was impeached and disbarred.

These are two alternative sets of facts. &lt;b&gt;Their relevance depends on the argument one is making. People marshal different sets of facts to support their arguments all the time. &lt;/b&gt;It is the entire basis of the legal profession. That Conway is able to speak about her argument in this way demonstrates (at the very least) a basic understanding of rhetoric that her detractors obviously (or conveniently) lack.
* * 
Good point.
She should still have said something like &quot;additional&quot; rather than &quot;alternative&quot; but nobody&#039;s perfect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Says:<br />
January 25th, 2017 at 4:10 am<br />
Bill Clinton was a popular president, who passed NAFTA, and won reelection.</p>
<p>Bill Clinton banged his intern, lied about it, and as a result was impeached and disbarred.</p>
<p>These are two alternative sets of facts. <b>Their relevance depends on the argument one is making. People marshal different sets of facts to support their arguments all the time. </b>It is the entire basis of the legal profession. That Conway is able to speak about her argument in this way demonstrates (at the very least) a basic understanding of rhetoric that her detractors obviously (or conveniently) lack.<br />
* *<br />
Good point.<br />
She should still have said something like &#8220;additional&#8221; rather than &#8220;alternative&#8221; but nobody&#8217;s perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2168156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2168156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sperta Says: 
January 25th, 2017 at 1:12 am
2+2=4 and 1+3=4 are alternative facts
* * *
&quot;Base 8 is just like base 10, if you&#039;re missing 2 fingers.&quot;
and if you are speaking in binary,
&quot;There are only 10 kinds of people in the world.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sperta Says:<br />
January 25th, 2017 at 1:12 am<br />
2+2=4 and 1+3=4 are alternative facts<br />
* * *<br />
&#8220;Base 8 is just like base 10, if you&#8217;re missing 2 fingers.&#8221;<br />
and if you are speaking in binary,<br />
&#8220;There are only 10 kinds of people in the world.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2168143</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2168143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[huxley Says: 
January 25th, 2017 at 12:22 am..

I had assumed Whedon was a closeted libertarian taking a quietly contrary stand with “Firefly” and “Serenity”, but apparently not.
* * *
There are a lot of those looks-like-libertarian
progressives in the movie biz.  I still don&#039;t know if they are clueless about the meaning of their works to the general public, or cynically milking the rubes.

It&#039;s only been in the last three elections that I have realized how far some people&#039;s personal politics diverge from their platinum-screen presentations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huxley Says:<br />
January 25th, 2017 at 12:22 am..</p>
<p>I had assumed Whedon was a closeted libertarian taking a quietly contrary stand with “Firefly” and “Serenity”, but apparently not.<br />
* * *<br />
There are a lot of those looks-like-libertarian<br />
progressives in the movie biz.  I still don&#8217;t know if they are clueless about the meaning of their works to the general public, or cynically milking the rubes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only been in the last three elections that I have realized how far some people&#8217;s personal politics diverge from their platinum-screen presentations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DEEBEE		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2167884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DEEBEE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2167884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fact checking, nothing but presentation of putative alternative facts.

Trump and his acolytes quite often speak rather loosely. MSM pick that up and ignores benign characterizations and go with the worst king. Case in point &quot;alternative facts&quot; ha ha ha double speak, she meant lies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact checking, nothing but presentation of putative alternative facts.</p>
<p>Trump and his acolytes quite often speak rather loosely. MSM pick that up and ignores benign characterizations and go with the worst king. Case in point &#8220;alternative facts&#8221; ha ha ha double speak, she meant lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manju		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2167775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2167775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;If your only point was to say he made an error...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not “&lt;em&gt;an&lt;/em&gt; error”. He made at least 3. And those 3 hit the high-bar of being demonstratively false. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;use the word “error.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Error usually means unintentional. Lies, intentional. I wasn’t addressing that issue, so I went with false/falsehood. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;The only logical way your remarks make sense is if you meant “falsehood.” If you meant “error,” I don’t even get why you bothered to say it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You’re comparing Spicer’s statements to “alternative facts”  that are “presented all the time, particularly in cases in which certainty is impossible.” But such facts are presumably accurate, even if they do not make a compelling case. 

Spicer in contrast made straight-up false assertions. AFAK he’s only retracted one of them. His conclusion 
(largest audience both in person and around the globe) is demonstratively false if taken together. If combined, it’s still likely false. 

Yet he has the nerve to describe it as a certainty, while accusing the Media of lying. Imagine if the guy who spread the MLK-bust falsehood didn’t retract it, said that it still could be true, and called the Trump admin liars. That’s pretty much where Spicer / Trump are on this issue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If your only point was to say he made an error&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Not “<em>an</em> error”. He made at least 3. And those 3 hit the high-bar of being demonstratively false. </p>
<blockquote><p>use the word “error.” </p></blockquote>
<p>Error usually means unintentional. Lies, intentional. I wasn’t addressing that issue, so I went with false/falsehood. </p>
<blockquote><p>The only logical way your remarks make sense is if you meant “falsehood.” If you meant “error,” I don’t even get why you bothered to say it.</p></blockquote>
<p>You’re comparing Spicer’s statements to “alternative facts”  that are “presented all the time, particularly in cases in which certainty is impossible.” But such facts are presumably accurate, even if they do not make a compelling case. </p>
<p>Spicer in contrast made straight-up false assertions. AFAK he’s only retracted one of them. His conclusion<br />
(largest audience both in person and around the globe) is demonstratively false if taken together. If combined, it’s still likely false. </p>
<p>Yet he has the nerve to describe it as a certainty, while accusing the Media of lying. Imagine if the guy who spread the MLK-bust falsehood didn’t retract it, said that it still could be true, and called the Trump admin liars. That’s pretty much where Spicer / Trump are on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee Dodson		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2167671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Dodson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2167671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The entire discussion is based on lack of info. Dept of Parks has a method of determining crowd size and has used it for years. The DPS shoots aerial pix of the entire area, then uses a well established algorithm to estimate attendance. It works to a +/- of 1000 people. 

Just ask them, they were quite proud of the results during the Obama years. The upshot is the numbers can be easily had from a credible source. Why have they not offered the info?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire discussion is based on lack of info. Dept of Parks has a method of determining crowd size and has used it for years. The DPS shoots aerial pix of the entire area, then uses a well established algorithm to estimate attendance. It works to a +/- of 1000 people. </p>
<p>Just ask them, they were quite proud of the results during the Obama years. The upshot is the numbers can be easily had from a credible source. Why have they not offered the info?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Big Maq		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2167629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Maq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2167629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;&quot;We stopped being a civil society back in the 1960s.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; - parker

Not sure to agree or disagree.

Don&#039;t know how one measures all this, but there was a courseness / indecency that existed long before the 60s.  

The difference, may be that folks don&#039;t feel the need to contain themselves.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/22/luntz_i_was_called_a_fascist_glitter_thrown_in_my_face_i_never_thought_this_would_happen_in_this_country.html

What is reaped is what we find acceptable.  

If we acquiesce to it, don&#039;t hold accountable our side, then it is not the left&#039;s fault.

It is our choice.
.

This is an escalation of some form of tit for tat, getting even, in many folks&#039; mind, it seems.

That not a winning strategy, as it loses focus on the real goals, and it devolves into a losing cycle of revenge.

I really don&#039;t want to see any good things trump may accomplish get overshadowed by all this, and a resulting future backlash reversing all that good.

I will continue to expect better and hold accountable &quot;our&quot; side, in particular, while still aiming for the same for all sides.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;We stopped being a civil society back in the 1960s.&#8221;</em> &#8211; parker</p>
<p>Not sure to agree or disagree.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know how one measures all this, but there was a courseness / indecency that existed long before the 60s.  </p>
<p>The difference, may be that folks don&#8217;t feel the need to contain themselves.<br />
<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/22/luntz_i_was_called_a_fascist_glitter_thrown_in_my_face_i_never_thought_this_would_happen_in_this_country.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/22/luntz_i_was_called_a_fascist_glitter_thrown_in_my_face_i_never_thought_this_would_happen_in_this_country.html</a></p>
<p>What is reaped is what we find acceptable.  </p>
<p>If we acquiesce to it, don&#8217;t hold accountable our side, then it is not the left&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>It is our choice.<br />
.</p>
<p>This is an escalation of some form of tit for tat, getting even, in many folks&#8217; mind, it seems.</p>
<p>That not a winning strategy, as it loses focus on the real goals, and it devolves into a losing cycle of revenge.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t want to see any good things trump may accomplish get overshadowed by all this, and a resulting future backlash reversing all that good.</p>
<p>I will continue to expect better and hold accountable &#8220;our&#8221; side, in particular, while still aiming for the same for all sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hangtown Bob		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2167623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hangtown Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2167623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FWIW, Gateway Pundit has a story showing a CNN updated photo of the crowd size.  It contains a gigapixel photo of the crowd from the Capitol itself to the Washington Monument.  One can scan the crowd and zoom in to see incredible details of individual faces of the thousands of people on the Mall.

The details are amazing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, Gateway Pundit has a story showing a CNN updated photo of the crowd size.  It contains a gigapixel photo of the crowd from the Capitol itself to the Washington Monument.  One can scan the crowd and zoom in to see incredible details of individual faces of the thousands of people on the Mall.</p>
<p>The details are amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/24/an-alternative-way-to-look-at-alternative-facts/#comment-2167612</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=66201#comment-2167612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Manju:

But that&#039;s what it usually means, and that&#039;s what we&#039;re talking about.

If your only point was to say he made an error, use the word &quot;error.&quot;  And that point would agree with just about everyone else here, so why make it at all?

The only logical way your remarks make sense is if you meant &quot;falsehood.&quot;  If you meant &quot;error,&quot; I don&#039;t even get why you bothered to say it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manju:</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s what it usually means, and that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>If your only point was to say he made an error, use the word &#8220;error.&#8221;  And that point would agree with just about everyone else here, so why make it at all?</p>
<p>The only logical way your remarks make sense is if you meant &#8220;falsehood.&#8221;  If you meant &#8220;error,&#8221; I don&#8217;t even get why you bothered to say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
