<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The party and the parties	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: OM		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2160902</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2160902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CBI:

Useful and insightful  You seem to be treating people as individuals and attempt to converse and communicate with.  Or is the point just to argue and cause conflict?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBI:</p>
<p>Useful and insightful  You seem to be treating people as individuals and attempt to converse and communicate with.  Or is the point just to argue and cause conflict?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2160527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2160527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CBI. It would defuse the situation. As is often said, blessed are the peacemakers.  It might mollify those who believe as you do and keep them from speaking up and causing a fuss by contradicting the Self Proclaimed Exceptionally Wonderful (SPEW).
But this discussion has moved from how to be politely submissive to the Idiot Left to how to at least cause some doubt in what passes for their thinking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBI. It would defuse the situation. As is often said, blessed are the peacemakers.  It might mollify those who believe as you do and keep them from speaking up and causing a fuss by contradicting the Self Proclaimed Exceptionally Wonderful (SPEW).<br />
But this discussion has moved from how to be politely submissive to the Idiot Left to how to at least cause some doubt in what passes for their thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CBI		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2160057</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CBI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 06:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2160057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m late to the discussion, but I think Neo is correct in noting that venues (or situations) make a difference in how a person can respond.

That said, based upon my own experiences,  I have found this technique to be valuable in situations such as she faced:

1. Make a clear and countering---but very civil--claim.  E.g., &quot;I think that Trump&#039;s crude language is not as bad as Clinton&#039;s criminality.&quot;

2. Place it into the *context of the situation*:  &quot;But we  both know that good people can differ about such things.&quot;

3. Then---and very importantly---offer a way out.  &quot;Let&#039;s talk about something else and avoid arguments and disagreements&quot;  

In &lt;b&gt;every&lt;/b&gt; face-to-face discussion where I&#039;ve applied it to date, I&#039;ve found that this combination (&lt;em&gt;I disagree--that&#039;s OK--let&#039;s not fight&lt;/em&gt;) has both defused the matter and led to a topic change.  In addition, should the initial speaker respond rudely, it is &lt;em&gt;he&lt;/em&gt; who is being rude and ruining things.  Most people are willing to avoid disagreements to keep things running smoothly---and most onlookers will show displeasure at the one who escalates a disagreement.

Note that this does not necessarily work online:  friends of friends occasionally go hermatile.    I have several friends of long term who are rather far left, but are OK with disagreements.  they&#039;ve even apologized when one of their other FaceBook friends got rude.  

YMMV, of course, but I think that it is well worth the risk to increase the sphere of &quot;we disagree on politics, but so what&quot; as well as the &quot;not all non-leftists are evil, hidden, &#039;mysterious other&#039; people.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to the discussion, but I think Neo is correct in noting that venues (or situations) make a difference in how a person can respond.</p>
<p>That said, based upon my own experiences,  I have found this technique to be valuable in situations such as she faced:</p>
<p>1. Make a clear and countering&#8212;but very civil&#8211;claim.  E.g., &#8220;I think that Trump&#8217;s crude language is not as bad as Clinton&#8217;s criminality.&#8221;</p>
<p>2. Place it into the *context of the situation*:  &#8220;But we  both know that good people can differ about such things.&#8221;</p>
<p>3. Then&#8212;and very importantly&#8212;offer a way out.  &#8220;Let&#8217;s talk about something else and avoid arguments and disagreements&#8221;  </p>
<p>In <b>every</b> face-to-face discussion where I&#8217;ve applied it to date, I&#8217;ve found that this combination (<em>I disagree&#8211;that&#8217;s OK&#8211;let&#8217;s not fight</em>) has both defused the matter and led to a topic change.  In addition, should the initial speaker respond rudely, it is <em>he</em> who is being rude and ruining things.  Most people are willing to avoid disagreements to keep things running smoothly&#8212;and most onlookers will show displeasure at the one who escalates a disagreement.</p>
<p>Note that this does not necessarily work online:  friends of friends occasionally go hermatile.    I have several friends of long term who are rather far left, but are OK with disagreements.  they&#8217;ve even apologized when one of their other FaceBook friends got rude.  </p>
<p>YMMV, of course, but I think that it is well worth the risk to increase the sphere of &#8220;we disagree on politics, but so what&#8221; as well as the &#8220;not all non-leftists are evil, hidden, &#8216;mysterious other&#8217; people.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OM		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2159932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2159932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Real Housewives of ISIS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOB6UDC-67w

How insensitive!  I&#039;m outraged!  :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Real Housewives of ISIS.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOB6UDC-67w" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOB6UDC-67w</a></p>
<p>How insensitive!  I&#8217;m outraged!  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OM		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2159894</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 04:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2159894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Pointless/AnimalGroups.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Pointless/AnimalGroups.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Pointless/AnimalGroups.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2159840</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 04:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2159840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;&quot;I approached a huddle of nice liberals . . . .&quot; [MHollywood @ 7:07]&lt;/b&gt;

A gaggle of geese, a pod of whales, a huddle of liberals --- that is a keeper!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>&#8220;I approached a huddle of nice liberals . . . .&#8221; [MHollywood @ 7:07]</b></p>
<p>A gaggle of geese, a pod of whales, a huddle of liberals &#8212; that is a keeper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OM		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2159832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 04:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2159832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MHollywood:

The NATO exercise was in June 2016.  

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/06/07/u-s-nato-countries-begin-largest-military-exercise-in-europe-since-cold-war/?utm_term=.1f289f5110bb

I saw some photos recently and some video of armored vehicles on the firing ranges but I haven&#039;t been able to track it down.  Poland in the summertime.....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MHollywood:</p>
<p>The NATO exercise was in June 2016.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/06/07/u-s-nato-countries-begin-largest-military-exercise-in-europe-since-cold-war/?utm_term=.1f289f5110bb" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/06/07/u-s-nato-countries-begin-largest-military-exercise-in-europe-since-cold-war/?utm_term=.1f289f5110bb</a></p>
<p>I saw some photos recently and some video of armored vehicles on the firing ranges but I haven&#8217;t been able to track it down.  Poland in the summertime&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MHollywood		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2159790</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MHollywood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 03:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2159790</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i take it all back.  I vow not to comment on anything anywhere ever again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i take it all back.  I vow not to comment on anything anywhere ever again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MHollywood		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2159627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MHollywood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 02:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2159627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OM it&#039;s on YouTube - and 504 people in the world have watched it.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dnRgFJWtE4]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OM it&#8217;s on YouTube &#8211; and 504 people in the world have watched it.  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dnRgFJWtE4" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dnRgFJWtE4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deep Cover		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2017/01/03/the-party-and-the-parties/#comment-2159600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Cover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 01:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=65633#comment-2159600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I meant to say &quot;serious Hillary country&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say &#8220;serious Hillary country&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
