You have to Notice what Sets Him Off. Same with Trum. Trum’s children didn’t get to be where they are, without learning how to deal with Trum, a narcissist, although perhaps not a malignant narcissist. They know what sets Trum off and can manage him, although few else can or will try to.

Trum’s children, adults if I recall, are like Valerie Jarret. They have their reasons for managing the guy.

People who had to use NLP and other fruits of the reverse engineered PUA nerd pioneers, had to put in extreme amounts of work, in order to emulate the effect that power and wealth naturally conveys to the Trums of the world. If you or any normal person were caught with half the things Ted Kennedy was caught with, you would be destroyed, not a US Senator until death. Same for HRC or Bill or Epstein.

NLP and various other human manipulation technologies, are designed to produce through work and self transformation, what the wealthy and powerful naturally have and didn’t have to work for.

MollyG Says:
October 29th, 2016 at 3:57 pm
Scott Adams is that creepy, double-plus-unhot guy who studied hypnosis and NLP so he could “get chicks.” Just look at him.

Adams has perhaps transformed himself and become a better marketer for his life long gain. But that just means he is in search of a King, and not someone who should be trusted precisely because unless you have equal or better psychological manipulation abilities as Adams, then your defenses are no where near close enough to filter out the bs from the deception vis a vis an Adams production.

Hypnosis and NLP, which Hussein O has also used in his speeches, is not about using reason to convince people who have a lot of “information”. In fact, the easiest people to con are the “experts” and high intellectuals.

From what I can tell, Trump is a sledge-hammer con-man with poor self-control who just doesn’t give a shit. That has its advantages but is not what I would call Master Persuader territory.

The only ones that can lay claim to that mantle and title are the Alt Right pioneers who run Trum’s early and middle game media narration online. Or Trum’s own family clan, which seems a lot more competent than the usual corrupt staffers from DC (Recall McCain’s staff that went after Palin and benefited from Democrat collusion).

Typical shortsightedness and lack of accurate human analysis. When Bush II did things the Left liked, like the TSA (after he opposed its creation) and No Child Left Behind, of course Leftists and the media covered for him.

The Left knows the difference between carrots and sticks even if the American people has no proper education in the Art of Propaganda and conditioning.

In which case, the ruled are more or less stuck where they’ve already been. And therefore the ruled would have to seek other ways to end their oppression.

He’s also shown an almost self-destructive inability to let go of insults, pulled endorsements, etc. I read this morning that he’s now going after a Republican governor (Kasich). He can’t handle it when people oppose him or mock him and he seems to have a very highly developed revenge motive.

The idea that when he has the full Executive arsenal at his disposal he won’t weaponize it (or continue the weaponization) to go after his enemies is really wishful thinking, I believe.

Someone suggested last time I brought this up that it won’t happen because the bureaucracies are generally liberal forget that a WHOLE LOT of Trump’s “enemies” are Republicans.

If we suppose the “. . . least likely . . . and least capable . . .” is taken as a sort of positive injunction to prefer the most idiotic type of ruler, the gravest bumbler, as the one who would be least probable to do harms, whether harms great or small to the ruled. This simpleton sort of ruler, it may be supposed, can’t be clever, and therefore, it might be assumed, cannot conceive of harms to do, or if he does conceive them, then cannot conceive the means by which to accomplish them. Possibly in amplification of this, he may be indolent, simply too lazy to work himself up to vigorously chasing after new projects by which to torment his subjects, but prefers to seek his physical pleasures in women and song, say, if not in liquor and pharmaceuticals (for we’re told he’s a teetotaler by choice). Heap him with babes, money, and praise and we’re good to go.

It’s an unusual approach to thinking about our government, sure. But in some measure, it surely also seems to be an approach gaining traction among us today. In the condition of an increasing rule of experts in bureaucracies [the managerial state] insulated from correction by the ruled, it’s possibly not so improbable that the ruled would turn to the notion of their salvation in something akin to a perfect opposition to their current oppressors: namely, from “wise guys” (yes, a mafia) to “imbeciles”.

Odd, maybe, but not altogether surprising.

Of course, there remains that tiny little problem concerning his lunatic ambition (so once again a question of character). Yes. One can only guess at where that might lead.