<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gary Johnson gets an endorsement	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 14:04:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: OM		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1732269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 14:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1732269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ymarsakar:

What world do you live in?  Bizarre.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ymarsakar:</p>
<p>What world do you live in?  Bizarre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1722667</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1722667</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Can’t take what you don’t have. Get back on your soap box like a good boy.&lt;/b&gt;

So long as you claim to be a Christian, yet profess in the heresy of denying the Christian Gospel and won&#039;t even countenance the existence of Lucifer or Satan obtaining souls on this earth through evil, people will continue to filter your sarcasm clown car in their own ways.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Can’t take what you don’t have. Get back on your soap box like a good boy.</b></p>
<p>So long as you claim to be a Christian, yet profess in the heresy of denying the Christian Gospel and won&#8217;t even countenance the existence of Lucifer or Satan obtaining souls on this earth through evil, people will continue to filter your sarcasm clown car in their own ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1722033</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1722033</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;It’s devastating that so many conservatives are buying it!&lt;/b&gt;

They never heard about it, thus they can&#039;t buy what nobody wants to sell them.

Much of this is merely White Nationalism and White Christian Nationalism (meaning another form of Heresy). It&#039;s not GamerGate nor is it Milo&#039;s style of anti Left counter pushing. It&#039;s not modern internet culture nor is it even particularly modern sub cultures. From what evidence I can detect, White Nationalism has been around since the Democrats of the 1830s. It has never gone away. You can&#039;t get rid of it just by ostracizing it from the mainstream. And it&#039;s not because of the internet either.

Vox Day is a good, though rare, example of White Christian Nationalism, although Vox Day Himself is a Red Indian by parts of his blood to the reservation tribes. How I wonder how he keeps that self loathing in check, given what he believes concerning race supremacy eugenics. After all, if one believes in that, then the Chinese, Japanese, and Jews are superior because of their IQ, then it makes perfect sense why people find Jews all over the place. It speaks of a dark place in their hearts, controlled by Lucifer/Satan, that they haven&#039;t figured this part of their human shell out yet.

Perhaps Lucifer has promised them power in return for defeating the Left, but that&#039;s like manipulating the Left to fight the Right, no matter who wins, Lucifer still wins in checkmate. Catch 22.

The white nationalists want power, and so they are picking this as a strategic time and place to join together and use each other for power, in the Alt Right coalition. I think many Tea Party members and American patriots/conservatives/Republicans (Vox Day lives in Italy and runs his own publishing house, it doesn&#039;t matter to him if your America burns, since he&#039;s either Catholic or his own heretical church anyways). Just as the Left allied with Islamic Jihad, thinking they could use each other, while secretly planning to kill the other when power comes to them, the White Nationalists is thinking of conducting a coup de tat in the US once they obtain enough power over the Left and the rest of you. And the Tea Party American patriots, also are thinking in similar lines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>It’s devastating that so many conservatives are buying it!</b></p>
<p>They never heard about it, thus they can&#8217;t buy what nobody wants to sell them.</p>
<p>Much of this is merely White Nationalism and White Christian Nationalism (meaning another form of Heresy). It&#8217;s not GamerGate nor is it Milo&#8217;s style of anti Left counter pushing. It&#8217;s not modern internet culture nor is it even particularly modern sub cultures. From what evidence I can detect, White Nationalism has been around since the Democrats of the 1830s. It has never gone away. You can&#8217;t get rid of it just by ostracizing it from the mainstream. And it&#8217;s not because of the internet either.</p>
<p>Vox Day is a good, though rare, example of White Christian Nationalism, although Vox Day Himself is a Red Indian by parts of his blood to the reservation tribes. How I wonder how he keeps that self loathing in check, given what he believes concerning race supremacy eugenics. After all, if one believes in that, then the Chinese, Japanese, and Jews are superior because of their IQ, then it makes perfect sense why people find Jews all over the place. It speaks of a dark place in their hearts, controlled by Lucifer/Satan, that they haven&#8217;t figured this part of their human shell out yet.</p>
<p>Perhaps Lucifer has promised them power in return for defeating the Left, but that&#8217;s like manipulating the Left to fight the Right, no matter who wins, Lucifer still wins in checkmate. Catch 22.</p>
<p>The white nationalists want power, and so they are picking this as a strategic time and place to join together and use each other for power, in the Alt Right coalition. I think many Tea Party members and American patriots/conservatives/Republicans (Vox Day lives in Italy and runs his own publishing house, it doesn&#8217;t matter to him if your America burns, since he&#8217;s either Catholic or his own heretical church anyways). Just as the Left allied with Islamic Jihad, thinking they could use each other, while secretly planning to kill the other when power comes to them, the White Nationalists is thinking of conducting a coup de tat in the US once they obtain enough power over the Left and the rest of you. And the Tea Party American patriots, also are thinking in similar lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1722016</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1722016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Why do I get the “vibration” from this and other of his comments that Bill is a Clinton troll?&lt;/b&gt;

It&#039;s probably the same kind as the one Chris Matthews got up his leg when he met Hussein Obola for the first time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Why do I get the “vibration” from this and other of his comments that Bill is a Clinton troll?</b></p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably the same kind as the one Chris Matthews got up his leg when he met Hussein Obola for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1721967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1721967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;The legal sky has already fallen, haven’t you noticed? And millions of taxpayer funded illegal aliens and Democrat client class members are adding their mass daily, in an effort to keep it down.&lt;/b&gt;


That&#039;s been the case even before 2007, when I first started figuring out the vast reserves which the Leftist alliance was only just activating in this century.

So it is natural people right now are afraid and feeling a call to action, but the erosion has been going on for quite some time now. If the Left ever survives to pull 50% of their strategic reserve into action, then people would be more accurate to call in the doomsday rockets. Because, quite literally, they will have to then.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The legal sky has already fallen, haven’t you noticed? And millions of taxpayer funded illegal aliens and Democrat client class members are adding their mass daily, in an effort to keep it down.</b></p>
<p>That&#8217;s been the case even before 2007, when I first started figuring out the vast reserves which the Leftist alliance was only just activating in this century.</p>
<p>So it is natural people right now are afraid and feeling a call to action, but the erosion has been going on for quite some time now. If the Left ever survives to pull 50% of their strategic reserve into action, then people would be more accurate to call in the doomsday rockets. Because, quite literally, they will have to then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1721953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1721953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;— Trump has openly and famously stated he would stabilize the border and enforce it and immigration law. Positive reason to vote for Trump.&lt;/b&gt;

It&#039;s one of those &quot;You can keep your doctor and plan if you like them&#039; sort of deals. People who are afraid of death or of invaders, will often believe whatever they are told, if 1. they want it to be true or 2. they fear the opposite is true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>— Trump has openly and famously stated he would stabilize the border and enforce it and immigration law. Positive reason to vote for Trump.</b></p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of those &#8220;You can keep your doctor and plan if you like them&#8217; sort of deals. People who are afraid of death or of invaders, will often believe whatever they are told, if 1. they want it to be true or 2. they fear the opposite is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DNW		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1719373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DNW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1719373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have no idea who this YouTube commentator is, and I have done enough of my own research on Gary Johnson to know that he is a complete clown, without being told.

However for those looking to get a laugh out of the sad state of affairs of so-called &quot;libertarianism&quot; nowadays, enjoy laughing along with this over the top presentation.

&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW5gQo43ay4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Gary Johnson is no Libertarian...&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who this YouTube commentator is, and I have done enough of my own research on Gary Johnson to know that he is a complete clown, without being told.</p>
<p>However for those looking to get a laugh out of the sad state of affairs of so-called &#8220;libertarianism&#8221; nowadays, enjoy laughing along with this over the top presentation.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW5gQo43ay4" rel="nofollow"> Gary Johnson is no Libertarian&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DNW		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1719171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DNW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1719171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Big Maq Says:
September 30th, 2016 at 11:27 am

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;” ” there is no limit in opposition to clinton.”/&lt;blockquote&gt;

You know no such thing. Funny though, how you continually recite this proposition while evading the implications for yourself when it comes to what you are willing to tolerate in order to avoid Trump.” — DNW&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry, DNW, it is you who is evading. Would like to hear your positive case to make for trump, and to what extent you recognize any magnitude of downside risk with trump.

When you turn it around to me, I have said that BOTH trump and clinton are unacceptable (for a surprising number of overlapping reasons), what I am doing about it — Libertarian at the top and GOP down ticket — and a positive case for why — not least of which is two moderate, two term GOP Governors at the top, whose focus is on limiting the size and scope of government (i.e. the right direction).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The guy with a supposed idea for recovery from Hillary, but who protests it is unreasonable to ask what it is or how it is going to work, accuses someone else of evading&quot; . That&#039;s pretty rich, Maq.

In fact I have mentioned several positive motivations to vote for Trump as bad as he might be in some ways, as opposed to Hillary of Gary Johnson.

For example, I mentioned that neither Johnson nor Hillary can be trusted on border integrity, which is critical to the integrity of the polity. 

- &lt;b&gt;Trump has openly and famously stated he would stabilize the border and enforce it and immigration law. &lt;/b&gt;Positive reason to vote for Trump.

Gary Johnson&#039;s meltdown over the term &quot;illegal immigrant&quot; on the other hand, and justifying the border invasion by saying anyone else would do the same, shows he cannot be trusted on matters of border security, or the law in a more general sense. 

- &lt;b&gt;Supreme Court picks. Trump released a list which Cruz reviewed and found compelling. Positive for Trump.&lt;/b&gt; 

For what it is worth he has committed to: &quot;Appoint justices to the United States Supreme Court who will uphold our laws and our Constitution. The replacement for Justice Scalia will be a person of similar views and principles ...&quot;

We know that Hillary would try and appoint a disaster, and unless the congress would allow the number of court members to decline through attrition to six or seven she will probably get one of her bad choices confirmed.


- &lt;b&gt;Trump has pledged to strengthen the military&lt;/b&gt; and been  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/us/politics/donald-trump-earns-backing-of-nearly-90-military-figures.html?_r=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;endorsed by a number of retired generals and admirals concerned by the state of the military&lt;/a&gt;  who have taken his pledge seriously. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/national-defense/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Positive to Trump on defense policy.&lt;/a&gt;

- &lt;b&gt;Trump has made serious noises about enforcing reciprocity on trade deals.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;3. Direct the Secretary of Commerce to identify every violation of trade agreements a foreign country is currently using to harm our workers, and also direct all appropriate agencies to use every tool under American and international law to end these abuses.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/trade/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Positive Trump.&lt;/a&gt; 


Law. Defense. Borders, Trade, and National Security. Positive Trump 

Will he follow through successfully? Who knows. He says he will try. 

The others either say, or we know based on experience, that they won&#039;t.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Big Maq Says:<br />
September 30th, 2016 at 11:27 am</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>” ” there is no limit in opposition to clinton.”/</p>
<blockquote>
<p>You know no such thing. Funny though, how you continually recite this proposition while evading the implications for yourself when it comes to what you are willing to tolerate in order to avoid Trump.” — DNW</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, DNW, it is you who is evading. Would like to hear your positive case to make for trump, and to what extent you recognize any magnitude of downside risk with trump.</p>
<p>When you turn it around to me, I have said that BOTH trump and clinton are unacceptable (for a surprising number of overlapping reasons), what I am doing about it — Libertarian at the top and GOP down ticket — and a positive case for why — not least of which is two moderate, two term GOP Governors at the top, whose focus is on limiting the size and scope of government (i.e. the right direction).</p></blockquote>
<p>The guy with a supposed idea for recovery from Hillary, but who protests it is unreasonable to ask what it is or how it is going to work, accuses someone else of evading&#8221; . That&#8217;s pretty rich, Maq.</p>
<p>In fact I have mentioned several positive motivations to vote for Trump as bad as he might be in some ways, as opposed to Hillary of Gary Johnson.</p>
<p>For example, I mentioned that neither Johnson nor Hillary can be trusted on border integrity, which is critical to the integrity of the polity. </p>
<p>&#8211; <b>Trump has openly and famously stated he would stabilize the border and enforce it and immigration law. </b>Positive reason to vote for Trump.</p>
<p>Gary Johnson&#8217;s meltdown over the term &#8220;illegal immigrant&#8221; on the other hand, and justifying the border invasion by saying anyone else would do the same, shows he cannot be trusted on matters of border security, or the law in a more general sense. </p>
<p>&#8211; <b>Supreme Court picks. Trump released a list which Cruz reviewed and found compelling. Positive for Trump.</b> </p>
<p>For what it is worth he has committed to: &#8220;Appoint justices to the United States Supreme Court who will uphold our laws and our Constitution. The replacement for Justice Scalia will be a person of similar views and principles &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>We know that Hillary would try and appoint a disaster, and unless the congress would allow the number of court members to decline through attrition to six or seven she will probably get one of her bad choices confirmed.</p>
<p>&#8211; <b>Trump has pledged to strengthen the military</b> and been  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/us/politics/donald-trump-earns-backing-of-nearly-90-military-figures.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">endorsed by a number of retired generals and admirals concerned by the state of the military</a>  who have taken his pledge seriously. <a href="https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/national-defense/" rel="nofollow">Positive to Trump on defense policy.</a></p>
<p>&#8211; <b>Trump has made serious noises about enforcing reciprocity on trade deals.</b> </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;3. Direct the Secretary of Commerce to identify every violation of trade agreements a foreign country is currently using to harm our workers, and also direct all appropriate agencies to use every tool under American and international law to end these abuses.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p> <a href="https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/trade/" rel="nofollow">Positive Trump.</a> </p>
<p>Law. Defense. Borders, Trade, and National Security. Positive Trump </p>
<p>Will he follow through successfully? Who knows. He says he will try. </p>
<p>The others either say, or we know based on experience, that they won&#8217;t.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Big Maq		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1719128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Maq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1719128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;&quot;Now people like me face the task of building a real conservative party from the bottom up. IMO, there may not be enough time to do so&quot;&lt;/em&gt; - parker

&lt;em&gt;&quot;&quot;The GOP needs to be chastened and sober up and get with the real business of trying to salvage conservative principles and philosophy and stand up against leftism.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; - Bill

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Convictions to freedom and liberty? Optional for now it seems.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; - OM

&lt;em&gt;&quot;The GOP may be kaput as a major party. If so mission accomplished, congratulations djt.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; - parker

As imperfect as it was, the GOP were the political home for conservative principles. In our lifetimes (perhaps since its birth), it was always something of a compromise in supporting a party leader / presidential candidate to represent all under the GOP banner.  Most, if not all candidates at least paid lip service to our Founding principles (despite the yells of &quot;RINO!!!&quot;).

In 2016, however, short of becoming a &quot;neoneoleftist&quot; (i.e. a convert to leftism), trump is a compromise about as far away from conservative priniciples as one can get. Whether one recognizes it or not, aligning oneself with trump is to align oneself with many of the headline alt-r themes.

This will be something that is going to be remembered for a generation or two - likely well past anyone&#039;s timeline to win back legitimacy and political relevancy under the GOP flag.

Of course, if trump wins, the transformation to an alt-r GOP will be near complete. 

If trump loses, it looks to still be relatively close.  That will only embolden the alt-r, and that, along with whatever it is that allowed many of us (including the politicians and elites) to make that compromise, will ensure that the conservative element of the GOP will have a monumental struggle to bring the party back on course.  

If trump loses big, then maybe there is a reasonable chance to salvage conservative principles within the GOP.  But this big a loss increasingly looks unlikely (largely due to how awful clinton is as a candidate).

If a trump win or a small margin loss, it looks like a building of a real conservative party from the bottom up is the task before us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Now people like me face the task of building a real conservative party from the bottom up. IMO, there may not be enough time to do so&#8221;</em> &#8211; parker</p>
<p><em>&#8220;&#8221;The GOP needs to be chastened and sober up and get with the real business of trying to salvage conservative principles and philosophy and stand up against leftism.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Bill</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Convictions to freedom and liberty? Optional for now it seems.&#8221;</em> &#8211; OM</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The GOP may be kaput as a major party. If so mission accomplished, congratulations djt.&#8221;</em> &#8211; parker</p>
<p>As imperfect as it was, the GOP were the political home for conservative principles. In our lifetimes (perhaps since its birth), it was always something of a compromise in supporting a party leader / presidential candidate to represent all under the GOP banner.  Most, if not all candidates at least paid lip service to our Founding principles (despite the yells of &#8220;RINO!!!&#8221;).</p>
<p>In 2016, however, short of becoming a &#8220;neoneoleftist&#8221; (i.e. a convert to leftism), trump is a compromise about as far away from conservative priniciples as one can get. Whether one recognizes it or not, aligning oneself with trump is to align oneself with many of the headline alt-r themes.</p>
<p>This will be something that is going to be remembered for a generation or two &#8211; likely well past anyone&#8217;s timeline to win back legitimacy and political relevancy under the GOP flag.</p>
<p>Of course, if trump wins, the transformation to an alt-r GOP will be near complete. </p>
<p>If trump loses, it looks to still be relatively close.  That will only embolden the alt-r, and that, along with whatever it is that allowed many of us (including the politicians and elites) to make that compromise, will ensure that the conservative element of the GOP will have a monumental struggle to bring the party back on course.  </p>
<p>If trump loses big, then maybe there is a reasonable chance to salvage conservative principles within the GOP.  But this big a loss increasingly looks unlikely (largely due to how awful clinton is as a candidate).</p>
<p>If a trump win or a small margin loss, it looks like a building of a real conservative party from the bottom up is the task before us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OM		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/09/29/gary-johnson-gets-an-endorsement/#comment-1719108</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=63089#comment-1719108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t take what you don&#039;t have.  Get back on your soap box like a good boy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t take what you don&#8217;t have.  Get back on your soap box like a good boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
