A Tea Party like structure?

Churches. The Left has used Christian churches, self proclaimed followers of Christ, like the WestBoro Baptists to conduct political operations. The real Christians also have a similar network, since Jesus was one of the first to overturn a situation where the entire world (Roman world) was against you. However, so long as freedom of religion operates in the US, those churches do not want to go active or openly political, thus you do not see them fight against the Left, except on a moral level.

I’ll give some hints for people who want specifics. The Left wants to abort new souls coming unto this Earth, presumably because Lucifer already has his special picked out squad and doesn’t want any additional reinforcements for his enemies. Each soul on this Earth, born to this Earth, has a choice of siding with good or evil. Thus the creation of life opposes Lucifer or evil, thus which modern nations and organizations have a birth rate higher than 3.0? If a birth rate higher than 3.0 can be established, then that organization is either blessed by God or blessed by Lucifer, given the corrupting nature of the modern world.

On the other hand, there are 4th generational cells already operating in the US. Except they fight for the patriotic side, not the Leftist regime’s side. Recruitment is not necessarily high on their lists atm.

As people begin to learn more fully what the true nature and true power of the Leftist alliance is, they will begin to desire a savior or a power great enough to defeat the Left. However, what power is great enough to defeat evil? If having the largest army and the best military power could defeat evil, how then has America fallen when the military has not been defeated?

By some token of insight, connecting the dots between several Leftist factions like the unions in 2007, unveiled the Left’s true power to me. Over time afterwards, additional research and connecting the dots solidified those suspicions.

People who want to see the truth and are willing to pay the price to see it, will usually get what they pay for. Those who stick their head in the sand thinking the nation or the world will save them… will also get the appropriate recompense.

From a statistical point of view, it is also easy to see evil if one wanted to, although correlation is not causation.

From a Christian point of view, being educated by the Holy Ghost is superior to research into mundane human affairs.

That’s not something you should say or write, GB, since a few years ago you claimed that Leftists/moderate Democrats would fight to the death to protect our right to speech in America, presumably because they are fellow Americans.

That’s the fatal mistake of thinking Leftists or Democrats are different because they have political differences. No, they are different because they are evil, and even if you recognize it now, that doesn’t take away from your past views.

So for you to criticize other people for what you also fell for and have fallen into, is something but quite right it is not prescience.

Neo, the NeverTrumpers are stabbing themselves in the back.

Twitter movements don’t have a back. By definition of their existence, they aren’t an organization. The factions that compose #NeverTrump are complicated, much like BLM. Many of them are also NeverCruz, in an alternative timeline.

It may take a few years or even a decade for the Civil War 2 I said was inevitable to go hot, but sooner or later, the factions in America will settle the issue, one way or another. Not with elections.

GOP took firm stands where they could… It is why Obama started to move to the active use of executive action.

Now, if the GOP is smart, they will realize that people don’t trust Hillary and will campaign hard to keep both houses of congress under GOP control. They should tell the public that someone needs to act as a check on power to Hillary. Sadly, I’m not certain that this will work. First of all, the GOP just isn’t that smart. Secondly, the GOP has promised this before, and they failed to deliver. After years of promising to fight against the DNC’s bad ideas and folding constantly, getting out the vote will be tough. And finally, it really doesn’t matter. President Hillary Clinton will continue to do what President Obama has started: condense all power in the Executive branch, making the Congress and the Judiciary basically irrelevant.

Still, the GOP should make an effort. First of all, if Hillary wins the Congress, she has more legitimacy for her attacks on the Constitution, and we will have few ways to investigate the inevitable corruption that follows. It would be better for Hillary to act as a dictator, over the objections of a GOP Congress, and fail. Furthermore, Hillary has never shown an ability to understand limits. A GOP Congress is an invitation for her to overreach. Perhaps we, as a country, can salvage something.

The rest is factual about Truman’s decision and rationale to avoid the necessity of Operation Olympic.

links please

Then you say that using our military to murder Islamist families is “totally unacceptable”.

Which is it? Surely such a tool cannot be so fine tuned as to only target those who are military targets?

Then, you add the rejoinder that “Whereas, Clinton will restrict her murdering to Americans”.

That implies some moral equivalent between the scale and target of ISIS type terrorism to clinton “murdering Americans”.

It is rather overwrought to make like clinton has intent to target Americans, and make an equivalency where there is none.

Now you walk it back by bringing up Benghazi, like the rest of us are unaware of the implications of that mistake.

You mistake questioning your rationale for trump or for an apocalyptic future imminent within these next four years, as not having any “prescience” about clinton, if not a full buy in to her presidency.

Not the case.

One has the feeling that if clinton wins and four years down the road we are still at this blog discussing the next election, the same apocalyptic “prescience” will be argued just as emphatically, despite its failure to appear the prior four years as “foreseen”.

There is enough downside with clinton that we don’t need to overstate the case against her.

This circles back to the “not clinton” argument and the failure provide a positive case for trump.