Most know Clinton would do the same and demand kickback to the Clinton Foundation Slush Fund.

It’s one reason why the world chafes under a now dead and ineffective Pax Americana.

The consent decrees are already being implemented in Newark, New Jersey; Miami, Florida; Los Angeles, California; Ferguson, Missouri; Chicago, Illinois; and other municipalities.

Here’s how it works: the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice files a lawsuit in federal court against a city, county, or state, alleging constitutional and civil rights violations by the police or at a corrections facility. It is done under 42 U.S.C. § 14141, a section of the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, granting the attorney general the power to prosecute law enforcement misconduct. The municipality then simply agrees to the judicial finding – without contest – and the result is a wide-reaching federal court order that imposes onerous regulations on local police.

In short, the much-feared nationalization of local police departments is already being initiated by the Obama administration’s Justice Department. And somehow nobody noticed.

[so keep paying attention to the bombast they are baiting and creating with Trump and you may find that the election will be called on account of the US becoming the same as Russia in the 100th year of the Soviet Revolution!!!!!!!!!!!]

Good thing the CIA provided the cover that prevents us from discussing this in the 1970s… (ny times article, i posted the old news of their campaign we now believe, based on their gaming us]

“…They were accused of spying and last month Fattal and Bauer were sentenced to eight years in prison. ”

Again, people convicted of crimes and have already been sentenced are not released on bail. They are released upon payment of the ransom.

Yes, but this isn’t the first time the Obama administration met the Iranians’ ransom demands when they’ve taken Americans hostage.

http://www.wsj.com/video/iran-sets-bail-for-two-americans/37E780F3-A1E3-4249-AD2A-1F41AE701FE4.html

This was in 2011 and HIllary was definitely Secretary of State at the time the administration paid the $500k ransom for each of the hostages. And, yes, I realize the press reported the payments as “bail,” but bail is a security payment that guarantees the accused will show up for trial.

1) People out on bail awaiting trial are not allowed to leave the country, especially in Iran.
2) The two male hikers were no longer awaiting trial; they had already been convicted and sentenced to eight years in prison illegal entry and espionage.

It was a ransom, pure and simple. But in 2011 the Iranians weren’t quite sure what they were dealing with so they were willing to call it bail to help Obama and Clinton save face. By January 2016 they realized Obama is so weak and feckless that he’d do what they demanded, no face saving gestures required. They were free to be openly contemptuous.

And as Secretary of State Clinton’s hands could not have been clean on that occasion. She would have had to been involved negotiating with the Swiss (and the Swiss also helped with this latest ransom payment) who have a US interests section in their Tehran embassy to help US nationals in Iran and with the Omanis who acted as Obama/Clinton’s bag men and transferred the funds from the USG to the Mullahs.

So I’m very familiar with these things personally from family and travel in those areas… It’s a formalized way corruption exists next to other things without question of its morality (usually)

Out ignorance and us to be played through our emotional custom…s which makes us believe we are right even if it’s wrong… In fact, we have been told wrong custom or partial custom removing exceptions and conditions that would allow us to think right

Children are to be protected by matter what sounds great until you meet one that is stoned and made into a killing machine… The exceptions removed and replaced by an absolute leaves one defenseless or hesitant where others without that have no issue

Same with Khan… Even neo silent time trying to imagine it if nothing something that would negate the Sharia law the couple follows and promoted with their money as an explanation because it would make Trump mean, not more knowledgeable about Islam and so do protection… In case you have no idea, trunk has many businesses deals in Islamic area and has to know the Sharia rules to conduct it

Neo and others forgot when devotion was normal and lack of whether to tenets now normal was considered very bad… The lens of secular western pseudo believe and personal version has people protecting their lack and cheating as normal to people that do not do that

Our troops caught by Iran sang like birds in the sun, divulged anything and everything to the embarrassment of the old timers… Yet Christians knowing they will be horribly tortured and makes to death, choose death in the middle East… Even children have more adherence and belief willing to die rather than say what is asked

His wife did not talk because he and she followed tenets in a way Westerners rarely understand any more to the point that they can’t believe this to be normal when they think someone crazy or extreme who follow such to that end…

They be playing your arse like a fiddle in the hands of the devil
You do not promote Sharia when you dont adhere…

And you should not ignore the lies to the face of two mom’s side children die in Benghazi as being nothing compared to a person fighting fire with fire when attacked ignoring the self serving debasement of the attackers abuse of their own child heroism fit the gain of depotism and imposition of Sharia

That’s OK… Back in the day, Cruz CFR campaign man was pardoned for creating the crack epidemic to fund Oliver north in south America and pay/force Israel to supply weapons to Iran…

Same old same old when the job is not representation but compact and collision for power and gain and ideology…
(Notice how much under the guise of cause impropriety we abandoned and never really had, the conspiracy to control the elective outcome

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-23/1967-he-cia-created-phrase-conspiracy-theorists-and-ways-attack-anyone-who-challenge

In 1967, the CIA Created the Label “Conspiracy Theorists” … to Attack Anyone Who Challenges the “Official” Narrative

The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.

Copy of the document can be seen
But if your forgot the article from way back when, then you believe what????

Very very interesting article on how we the people have been gamed and think that state of mind is normal

Two days ago they announced the effort to paint Trump as insane and I have been watching the collectives start to insert the theme and make it true into a failure consensus a la dialoguing

Wake up… Most with any mental issues end up quickly in poverty
Not successful with a false front public image that contradicts what those who have personal experience say and know!!!!

Wake up!!!

This came up in articles about Khan

Khan co-founded the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law, an academic periodical that seeks to defend the arcane Sharia law to a legal system based on Western jurisprudence. Of course, Sharia law justifies the execution of gays, prostitutes, blasphemers, and Muslim “apostates” who convert to other religions.