As to your later post, about expulsion, I have long thought that ethnic cleansing is a good, pushing multiculti diversity is a bad. Ethnic cleansing need not mean killing, just expulsion. Which is not an insuperable obstacle, despite what we are told ad nauseam. It has been part of human history forever. I just finished a historical biography of Alexander the Great, who leveled cities that opposed him in Greece, today’s Turkey, Iraq and Iran, and sold the inhabitants into slavery. That was about 300BC. Now, that was cleansing his conquered territory!

Frog has already abrogated his contract and covenant with Jesus Christ and God, into some kind of false Christian Nationalism.

Wanting to be saved by human conquerors because you fear Islam above all else, is mighty interesting. But it isn’t being a disciple of Jesus the Savior of humanity.

I just wanted to point that out. The thread comments where Frog admitted to what was motivating him, was several blog posts from now.

Christians do not ethnically cleanse. In fact, the Jews who set it up and crucified Christ by reporting Jesus to the Romans as a King of the Jews, wanted to ethnically cleanse Roman authority from the holy lands and temples. Their transgression against the Covenant and the prophecies of Moses, did not lead to the tribe of Israel’s prosperity later on in 75 AD.

How interesting it is to watch mortals fall to weakness and temptation, merely because they are “afraid” of secular enemies. How pathetically self righteous they must feel.

I’m sure the Southern Baptists fell into heresy and apostasy due to similar concerns about the Purity of the “White Aristocrat” slave lords.

Holding people in the US, without due process, is problematic. Deporting and exiling them, doesn’t need due process because the process they are “due” is reserved for when they want to come back. It is a problematic issue in general, because forced relocation from disaster spots can also be classified as lacking due process and disrespecting the will of the minority. There are arguments for either side.

The Muslims would know what a real genocide is, and in the Sudan and Africa, where they castrated black slaves and hunted down Christians.

“But their is no doubt that the doctrine is totalitarian, the sincere adherents fanatical, and the way of life practiced by these adherents alien and worthless.”

as,

“But there is no doubt that their doctrine is totalitarian, the sincere adherents fanatical, and the way of life practiced by these adherents alien and worthless.”

or

“But their doctrine is totalitarian, the sincere adherents fanatical, and the way of life practiced by these adherents alien and worthless.”

As I have said before, when I was a small boy my father would tell me – with suitable vagueness – something about foreigners from a particular place striving to go where they were restricted from going, and to see what they were not to see, and to illegally gain knowledge of what was not theirs to possess.

I said something like or to the effect of: “Why don’t you just kill them instead of playing these games?”

He reeled off a list of reasons of course: the practical including the resulting consequences, our own ideals of justice and humanity, and probably something about proportionality … though that never impressed me as much of an argument when you are dealing with what I saw as complete others that might as well have been space aliens.

Muslims, are a bit more problematical. But their is no doubt that the doctrine is totalitarian, the sincere adherents fanatical, and the way of life practiced by these adherents alien and worthless.

A reluctant Muslim may eventually make an adequate American, but a “good” Muslim, a follower of that piece of crap the Koran, is the enemy of the very laws that protect him from casual violence and attribute rights to him which he denies exist for others.

Islam is garbage. We had better face it …

” Law is the embodiment of the moral sentiment of the people.”

Neither one people, nor one sentiment. The law must fail.

You could wile away the hours, communing with the flowers, …if you only had a brain. Talk to your other strawmen.

That was not ‘backing off’, that was clarifying your misstatements, intentional or otherwise of my positions. And the longer you ‘misunderstand’ or misstate my position the greater the certainty that it is you that is engaged in dishonesty.

Since the “r” and “t” keys are adjacent and susceptible of a sliding double strike, I’ll use that as an excuse. It has the virtue of possibly even being true.

I suppose as part of a thought problem, one might ask of say, Chaldeans, who in my suggested scenario found a polity outside the orbit and influence of Islam, what mortal obligation they would subsequently have to allow the moral disease of Islam which caused them to flee their homelands in the first place, among them once again.

Of course we allow indigenous “Nazis” and Communists to live in the United States. But I am not sure that we have ever knowingly encouraged their mass migration here … unless they knew something of rocketry …

So finally back off and limit the Geoffrey rule to non-citizens. It takes a lot to get you to do that. But it’s a start. You have finally recognized that citizens have rights.

Your latest hobby, is ethnic cleansing, keep denying the history associated with it. Enjoy you ride.

If the person is an American citizen the rules are different. A Satanist can believe all kinds of things I would guess. An atheist can believe in nothing at all. A Hindu can believe….

Fixate on something else Mr. Honesty.