Hey B, if you can’t argue against them, it’s not my problem. It is, however, your problem.

Things don’t get ruined because you decide that they are ruined. You have to contest the battle a little, as Eric might have said.

Which is why Trum’s side will attempt to convince you to violate your conscience, and you will try to convince them that they shouldn’t. None of you will succeed at that, then somebody will decide to escalate matters. Your choice is whether you want to be on the first strike team or whether you want to be the receiving team, as Lincoln was.

My principles don’t need force of arms to settle them. They are true, irregardless of what people think or say or what power they bring to bear. However, that is not satisfactory for Leftists, Democrats, and nationalists who want power above all else, including sexual power, the ability of a Trum to make Cruz and others lick their shoes in submission and vassalage.

Those factions, B, you aren’t going to be able to get rid of using principles. Something people who cannot see the future, are blind to of course.

For some reason Ronald Reagan held Coolidge in high regard, but don’t know what he thought of “3 term” Hoover.

Post about Coolidge and Hoover again when you’ve finished your required reading:

http://www.amazon.com/Coolidge-Amity-Shlaes/dp/0061967599
592 pages including footnotes.

I found it to be very good. Much as I did the “forgotten Man.”

Facts matter, Blert.

You needs must go back ninety-years and correct those pundits — and do so quickly.

Your judgment would be valued — but for your legacy posts.

Objection is no refutation.

I can’t remember where I read it, but the first slave owner in America was black, and he wasn’t the only one.

Almost. It was not the first slave owner, but the first slave owner who win in a court the right to own a slave. So it could be considered that the person who introduced legal slavery in US through a lawsuit was black.

By the way, back then free blacks were far more likely to be slave owner than whites. This is another statistics nobody talks about.

Stephanopoulos is a ‘professional journalist’. That said, yes he does know better. That is beside the point. Anything, including roasting live babies is allowed if it furthers the agenda. While I am not willing to roast a live baby to further my agenda, I am also not willing to vote for djt.

Keith Ellison was born in 1963, so he can claim some ignorance, and judging from his career, even with a law degree, he doesn’t look all that bright, just smart enough to get elected. (He might even believe what he said, from being around biased or uninformed people most of his life.)

Tom Cole was born in 1949, so he would have direct experience of that time. He also has an M.A. from Yale and a PhD from the Univ of OK. And he has American Indian ancestry, being part Chickasaw.

What can one do? Correct the record, laugh off such antics, and find ways to lessen racial obsessions (perhaps starting with the blonde-haired, blue-eyed Senator Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren taking a DNA test? Only $99 at ancestry.com, as we’ve all seen the commercials, right?)