Noticing this too, on a bit by bit basis.

Probably only from those who do have a sense of “fairness” outweighing their need/desire to push an agenda.

Doubtful we will ever get to anything close to a “balanced” view point.

“Trump is beholden to no one, so is free to call these bastards out for their actions.”

You’re powerless by choice.

Once again, as we have seen many times over the last year, Trump has inspired such crazed hate in his political opponents that they go too far, ultimately benefiting him. In commenting on Ginsburg’s attacks on him, Trump said “her mind is shot.” That may be putting it too crudely, but there have been serious concerns about Ginsburg’s health for a long time. It is hard to believe that a justice fully in possession of her senses would have exposed her rank partisanship in interviews with the New York Times and CNN, as Ginsburg did.”

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/07/ginsburg-apologizes-for-attacks-on-trump.php

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/07/ginsburg-apologizes-for-attacks-on-trump.php

Years ago I read Raoul Berger’s book on impeachment. It was published during Nixon’s day. The phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors” doesn’t mean what most people think. It is a political remedy for abuse of power.

I know impeachment is a harsh remedy but we need to play hard ball with the Left.

The destruction the Left has worked on the American culture and the Rule of Law is massive.

I think the lawlessness of the Left is the thing I find most offensive.
* * *
At least she finally came out in the open, as opposed to the ones who believe exactly the same thing and are TOO SMART to say so out loud. She probably IS losing her mind (although, as Paul said, this is not her first gaffe), or at least losing her inhibitions, since there now seems to be NO negative consequences for admitting that the Left is Lawless (but heaven help anyone not part of their Victim Groups who breaks the smallest – or most inane – regulation that they approve of).
(CAPS are faster than sticking in the XHTML codes for emphasis).

“She should have been removed from the Supreme Court right then and there…”

Why? I’ve heard this argument before and never understood it. A judge isn’t bound to like the law. She’s bound to apply it. I’d imagine that each justice would love to sit down with the Constitution and an exacto knife and go to town. Wanting to doesn’t make her a bad justice.

It might seem like I’m making a mountain out of a molehill, but this really is the heart of the matter. Her mistake wasn’t in having political views, it was in putting them before her job. People who have been defending her are saying that she’s right and she’s passionate about protecting the country. If that’s the case, then she should quit her job and go defend the country however she thinks is fitting. That’s her option. But a Supreme Court justice is obligated to put duty over political opinion.