Is anyone going to prosecute the Democrats for intentionally getting Americas killed in Iraq under Bush II, in order to score political points?

No? Then the Democrats have been jeopardizing national security for decades, Vietnam included, and Americans have done nothing. Now they wonder why it got so bad?

No matter what the evidence … just reinterpret the law!

That is what has happened several times now. The Supreme Court has done it which is part of their job to interpret the law but not so sure of reinterpreting settle law.

DOJ under Holder has done it.

DOJ under Lynch is doing it now.

And now we have the FBI doing it.

Obama is the catalyst for all of this. We have become no more than a quasi dictatorship!

The world laughs at us.

What about 9/11 28 pages still hidin from the US population

http://rightasusual.blogspot.com/2016/07/voting-with-emotional-part-of-brain.html

***
Thanks – I remember that now.
But they could have threatened to “remember” what he said as something other than what he did say: that is the danger in depending on objectively unsupported testimony, especially of law-enforcement entities that have been honestly mistaken, if not outright lying (in the past for sure, possibly now, certainly in the future If Things Go On).

It is my understanding, from previous reading (doing this from memory), that Petraeus was threatened with prosecution for a greater offense and his admissions came as part of a plea bargain in which authorities charged him with a lesser offense.

“The arc of the moral universe is long,” shouted the freshly unindicted Hillary Clinton at a Democratic rally in North Carolina, with President Barack Obama at her side and the FBI behind her in her dust, “but it bends toward justice.”

* *
Please let it be so.

As a counterweight to Politico, try this article:
https://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2016/07/07/for-any-reasonable-prosecutor-damage-to-national-security-would-outweigh-extremely-careless-hillarys-largely-irrelevant-intent/?singlepage=true
“But more importantly, a reasonable prosecutor considering charges would not myopically obsess over Clinton’s state of mind. Far more weighty in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion would be two factors Comey did not cite at all in his presentation: (a) Congress’s purpose in criminalizing the grossly negligent mishandling of classified information, and (b) the harm actually done to the United States which, viewed from the perspective of the intelligence community underwritten by 50 billion American taxpayer dollars annually, was surely immense.”

That Politico link is from April, and somewhat outdated because it does not incorporate some new information Comey disclosed.