Comments on: The Comey announcement fallout: what now for Hillary and Trump?

By: Junius

Junius — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 02:54:05 +0000

Now we see how serious DJT is about doing what it takes to win the presidency. Not optimistic. Incredible that there isn’t a credible conservative, Republican nominee to run against this wretched woman. Slick Willie’s gotta be laughing his arse off.

By: A_Nonny_Mouse

A_Nonny_Mouse — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:12:35 +0000

J.J. 7/6/16 at 1:36

Heh, heh

My diagnosis: “Fear-of-Arkancide” Syndrome.

He’d better start telling the people he know that he’s NOT despondent over ANYTHING. And he should probably get a food-taster anyway, … just in case.

By: Richard Saunders

Richard Saunders — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 19:32:31 +0000

J.J. – great poster! We ought to have it made into signs and show up at Hillary rallies, waving them and shouting :No justice, no peace! No justice, no peace!”

By: Bob From Virginia

Bob From Virginia — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 19:09:59 +0000

Rasmussen reports that 54% wanted Hillary indicted and that 37% agree with Comey’s decision. In short all Democrats and a few Indies have accepted Comey’s view. All Repubs and a lot of Indies have the opposite opinion.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/july_2016/most_disagree_with_decision_not_to_indict_clinton

Oh and now even I am tempted to vote for Trump.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:22:49 +0000

What is remarkable about the Clinton emails is how little “classified” information was present. Yes she did purge some, but my thinking is she got and sent very little sensitive information via email.

Compared to what Snowden got, Clinton had far higher access and by necessity, had to sell secrets to bump up her influence and millions of income up.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:16:46 +0000

Yet another Republican (Comey) stabs us in the back in order to be loved by the MSM and Democrats.

Civil servants in DC are like Powell. R or D doesn’t mean much in a city, capital of freedom, which voted 90%+ for Hussein.

By: J.J.

J.J. — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:36:39 +0000

Comey’s motivation?
https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3901/6323/original.jpg?w=800&h

By: Richard Saunders

Richard Saunders — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:30:25 +0000

Steve57 — Comey explicitly said Hillary was above the law when he said (paraphrasing) “Don’t you little people think you can get away with this — we will prosecute you if you do.”

The rot has overtaken us.

By: Cap'n Rusty

Cap'n Rusty — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:05:27 +0000

DirtyJobsGuy:

So, you must know what was in the 30,000 e-mails she destroyed?

By: Cap'n Rusty

Cap'n Rusty — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:58:58 +0000

Warren Meyer at Coyote Blog makes an excellent point:
“Even if she had no intent to violate secrecy laws, she did – beyond a reasonable doubt – have intent to violate public transparency and FOIA laws. She wanted to make it hard, or impossible, for Conservative groups to see her communications, communications that the public has the right to see. In violating this law with full intent, she also inadvertently violated secrecy laws. I don’t consider this any different than being charged for murder when your bank robbery inadvertently led to someone’s death.”