<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: This is rich: covering the Trump coverage	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225806</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why are people getting upset with Progresoverpeace?

Just let the Left smash their face in, that&#039;s what the Left does. If they want our help and arms, they&#039;re going to have to ask politely, and maybe even beg for it given their relative status.

See, in a war, you don&#039;t win by doing the Conformist Circle Dance thing. That&#039;s not how it works. A lot of political boys over in lalaland still think this nation is about democracy and elections, so they think they finally woke up and found a King to save them, Trump.

King&#039;s not gonna save them, of course, for they woke up Too Late. It&#039;s too late.

It doesn&#039;t matter. I knew it didn&#039;t matter since 2007 at the earliest. The Left has enough power to terminate entire demographics in this continent. What people have seen is a merely few percent of the Left&#039;s true power. Even the so called rioters and BLM protesters are their SJW light trash, their light thugs, not the heavy hitters or the pros.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are people getting upset with Progresoverpeace?</p>
<p>Just let the Left smash their face in, that&#8217;s what the Left does. If they want our help and arms, they&#8217;re going to have to ask politely, and maybe even beg for it given their relative status.</p>
<p>See, in a war, you don&#8217;t win by doing the Conformist Circle Dance thing. That&#8217;s not how it works. A lot of political boys over in lalaland still think this nation is about democracy and elections, so they think they finally woke up and found a King to save them, Trump.</p>
<p>King&#8217;s not gonna save them, of course, for they woke up Too Late. It&#8217;s too late.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter. I knew it didn&#8217;t matter since 2007 at the earliest. The Left has enough power to terminate entire demographics in this continent. What people have seen is a merely few percent of the Left&#8217;s true power. Even the so called rioters and BLM protesters are their SJW light trash, their light thugs, not the heavy hitters or the pros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225802</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;I hope that those of you who are not yet convinced of this will be able to come together in a cordial way in November in order to defeat Hillary, if nothing else.&lt;/b&gt;

Assuming Hussein steps down off his Throne without force. Assuming Trump voters and US Patriots aren&#039;t hunted down and killed due to &quot;political violence&quot;.

This is what it means when a democracy becomes an oligarchy.

People should have been thinking about how to kill evil and destroy the Left&#039;s power. Instead, they think Trump will do it for them because Elections. Elections don&#039;t mean as much as you think they do now a days. Perhaps always.

Trump will be secured by the SS, of course, if he takes the Throne. But who is going to protect your families at the grassroots level from BLM, La Raza, San Jose death squads? Trump isn&#039;t going to protect you, he won&#039;t even know you exist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I hope that those of you who are not yet convinced of this will be able to come together in a cordial way in November in order to defeat Hillary, if nothing else.</b></p>
<p>Assuming Hussein steps down off his Throne without force. Assuming Trump voters and US Patriots aren&#8217;t hunted down and killed due to &#8220;political violence&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is what it means when a democracy becomes an oligarchy.</p>
<p>People should have been thinking about how to kill evil and destroy the Left&#8217;s power. Instead, they think Trump will do it for them because Elections. Elections don&#8217;t mean as much as you think they do now a days. Perhaps always.</p>
<p>Trump will be secured by the SS, of course, if he takes the Throne. But who is going to protect your families at the grassroots level from BLM, La Raza, San Jose death squads? Trump isn&#8217;t going to protect you, he won&#8217;t even know you exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225797</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Not supporting Trump is seen by many as a sign of closeted leftism, of secretly being a Democrat or Obamite. It’s seen as treachery to the conservative cause.&lt;/b&gt;

People can think what they wish, it isn&#039;t going to change the realities of a person&#039;s conscience.

Besides, as people can see, my predictions are accurate. The Left will stomp their boots on your heads and make sure you figure out where the real enemy is. And if Republicans are stupid enough to turn their firepower on their own ranks, they will figure out eventually how much the Left will take while they are distracted.

It&#039;s a little bit too late to use the conformist, circle dance thing in politics to bring US Patriots into line with the Party Line. 

As for war, Trump and the next US President won&#039;t have to worry about a foreign war. Cause they&#039;ll be in the US Civil War II. You might get WWIII on top of it, but it won&#039;t concern them overly much.

&lt;b&gt;but I sincerely believe he is a better alternative than any of the potential Democratic candidates in November.&lt;/b&gt;

The System is too powerful for any single human to turn Evil into Good. That&#039;s some magic alchemical trick that would be nice to see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Not supporting Trump is seen by many as a sign of closeted leftism, of secretly being a Democrat or Obamite. It’s seen as treachery to the conservative cause.</b></p>
<p>People can think what they wish, it isn&#8217;t going to change the realities of a person&#8217;s conscience.</p>
<p>Besides, as people can see, my predictions are accurate. The Left will stomp their boots on your heads and make sure you figure out where the real enemy is. And if Republicans are stupid enough to turn their firepower on their own ranks, they will figure out eventually how much the Left will take while they are distracted.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little bit too late to use the conformist, circle dance thing in politics to bring US Patriots into line with the Party Line. </p>
<p>As for war, Trump and the next US President won&#8217;t have to worry about a foreign war. Cause they&#8217;ll be in the US Civil War II. You might get WWIII on top of it, but it won&#8217;t concern them overly much.</p>
<p><b>but I sincerely believe he is a better alternative than any of the potential Democratic candidates in November.</b></p>
<p>The System is too powerful for any single human to turn Evil into Good. That&#8217;s some magic alchemical trick that would be nice to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OM		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 03:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yankee:

1.  Trump may not be interested in war, but others may be interested in exploiting his inexperience, China, Russia, Iran.  
2.  Tariffs and trade wars to &quot;bring back American jobs.&quot;  Not so good for economies of nations.  Oh  and the Fed can&#039;t keep quantitative easing and monetizing the debt forever.
3.  Regulations to enforce tariffs and trade wars, and Trump-care, that Donald vaguely proposed as better than the ACA.  He can want cheap energy until the cows come home, he will have to dismantle the EPA first, and the DOI, and the DOE.  I suspect he is too lazy for that challenge. Oh, and somehow keep the Saudis from killing what&#039;s left of the US oil and gas sector.
4. Just a Trump kleptocracy.  Trump doesn&#039;t have a record for honesty and integrity.  

&quot;It will be great.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yankee:</p>
<p>1.  Trump may not be interested in war, but others may be interested in exploiting his inexperience, China, Russia, Iran.<br />
2.  Tariffs and trade wars to &#8220;bring back American jobs.&#8221;  Not so good for economies of nations.  Oh  and the Fed can&#8217;t keep quantitative easing and monetizing the debt forever.<br />
3.  Regulations to enforce tariffs and trade wars, and Trump-care, that Donald vaguely proposed as better than the ACA.  He can want cheap energy until the cows come home, he will have to dismantle the EPA first, and the DOI, and the DOE.  I suspect he is too lazy for that challenge. Oh, and somehow keep the Saudis from killing what&#8217;s left of the US oil and gas sector.<br />
4. Just a Trump kleptocracy.  Trump doesn&#8217;t have a record for honesty and integrity.  </p>
<p>&#8220;It will be great.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yankee		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yankee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bill, you put forward a number of &quot;what-if&quot; scenarios, and asserted that they were all plausible.  Respectfully, most of them just don&#039;t hold up under analysis.  Let&#039;s look at a few:

1. Trump starting a war?  But with whom?  Which country, and what cause would he have to go war?  One has to be specific.  Remember, Obama &#038; Hillary bungled the ending of one war in Iraq, and started another in Libya that has had major consequences for our allies in Europe right now.  In contrast, Trump seems to display an aversion to getting involved in the Middle East, and wishes to avoid confrontations with Russia and China.

2. Trump making the economy worse?  But the last seven years have been significant for unusually low annual growth in the GDP.  That problem is likely due to excessive regulation, a tax system that is not optimized for higher growth, and Obamacare.  Trump and any Republicans in Congress will have better policies for higher GDP growth than anything Hillary or Sanders will come up with.

3. Inflation hitting 20%?  This isn&#039;t the 1970s, and we don&#039;t have upward pressures on prices.  Ceteris paribus, if Hillary or Sanders get their way and let in more immigrants, and have an effective tax on energy, then prices may tend to go higher.  Trump wants to restrict immigration and have cheap energy.

4. Trump turning the government into a kleptocracy?  But it&#039;s very likely that one major reason Hillary had that secret e-mail server was to conceal the connection between her political activities and donations to the Clinton Foundation.

I&#039;m aware of Trump&#039;s faults, and I don&#039;t expect him to be perfect.  But I sincerely believe he is a better alternative than any of the potential Democratic candidates in November.  Hillary is the modern face of blatant corruption and dishonesty.  I hope that those of you who are not yet convinced of this will be able to come together in a cordial way in November in order to defeat Hillary, if nothing else.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, you put forward a number of &#8220;what-if&#8221; scenarios, and asserted that they were all plausible.  Respectfully, most of them just don&#8217;t hold up under analysis.  Let&#8217;s look at a few:</p>
<p>1. Trump starting a war?  But with whom?  Which country, and what cause would he have to go war?  One has to be specific.  Remember, Obama &amp; Hillary bungled the ending of one war in Iraq, and started another in Libya that has had major consequences for our allies in Europe right now.  In contrast, Trump seems to display an aversion to getting involved in the Middle East, and wishes to avoid confrontations with Russia and China.</p>
<p>2. Trump making the economy worse?  But the last seven years have been significant for unusually low annual growth in the GDP.  That problem is likely due to excessive regulation, a tax system that is not optimized for higher growth, and Obamacare.  Trump and any Republicans in Congress will have better policies for higher GDP growth than anything Hillary or Sanders will come up with.</p>
<p>3. Inflation hitting 20%?  This isn&#8217;t the 1970s, and we don&#8217;t have upward pressures on prices.  Ceteris paribus, if Hillary or Sanders get their way and let in more immigrants, and have an effective tax on energy, then prices may tend to go higher.  Trump wants to restrict immigration and have cheap energy.</p>
<p>4. Trump turning the government into a kleptocracy?  But it&#8217;s very likely that one major reason Hillary had that secret e-mail server was to conceal the connection between her political activities and donations to the Clinton Foundation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m aware of Trump&#8217;s faults, and I don&#8217;t expect him to be perfect.  But I sincerely believe he is a better alternative than any of the potential Democratic candidates in November.  Hillary is the modern face of blatant corruption and dishonesty.  I hope that those of you who are not yet convinced of this will be able to come together in a cordial way in November in order to defeat Hillary, if nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not supporting Trump is seen by many as a sign of closeted leftism,  of secretly being a Democrat or Obamite. It&#039;s seen as treachery to the conservative cause. 

I wish they&#039;d see it for what it is - revulsion at an amoral man with a narcissistic disorder who will be a likely extinction level event for the Republican party,  possibly for conservatism,  and maybe even for the country.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not supporting Trump is seen by many as a sign of closeted leftism,  of secretly being a Democrat or Obamite. It&#8217;s seen as treachery to the conservative cause. </p>
<p>I wish they&#8217;d see it for what it is &#8211; revulsion at an amoral man with a narcissistic disorder who will be a likely extinction level event for the Republican party,  possibly for conservatism,  and maybe even for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard Saunders:

Uncalled-for remark, and I think you know that.

Nothing anyone here has said would imply a vote for Biden.  I think people have explained (I certainly have) that they would consider a viable third-party candidate on the right, but they don&#039;t have one.  There&#039;s nothing unclear about that.

Plus, as I&#039;ve said before, I think there&#039;s almost no chance the nominee will be Biden rather than Clinton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Saunders:</p>
<p>Uncalled-for remark, and I think you know that.</p>
<p>Nothing anyone here has said would imply a vote for Biden.  I think people have explained (I certainly have) that they would consider a viable third-party candidate on the right, but they don&#8217;t have one.  There&#8217;s nothing unclear about that.</p>
<p>Plus, as I&#8217;ve said before, I think there&#8217;s almost no chance the nominee will be Biden rather than Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Saunders		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, are you third-party guys going to vote for Joe Biden when he gets the nomination?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are you third-party guys going to vote for Joe Biden when he gets the nomination?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Big Maq		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Maq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Bill, great comment!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill, great comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Big Maq		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/04/this-is-rich-covering-the-trump-coverage/#comment-1225030</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Maq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60184#comment-1225030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Agree with Neo - the MSM seem to have been keeping their powder dry, so to speak, re:  Trump.  

That could be a function of where they get their research from.?

Yes, they&#039;ve been negative.  The negative has to be in comparison / relative to something - vs the other 16 candidates - not much; - vs Clinton - more noticeable.   

There is also a volume of time dimension - they&#039;ve essentially given Trump a LOT of airtime himself - almost shutting out the other 16 candidates, and, importantly, much of the bad news for Clinton/Obama.

No doubt, when the Dems finally declare Clinton their candidate (essentially after tomorrow), look to the Dem machine turning its sights on Trump.  They will have oppo information and related narratives that they will be feeding to the MSM in various ways.

I don&#039;t buy the idea that the MSM are so beholding to ratings that they&#039;d rather Trump win.  Bias will probably win the day as they still have to live here.

But, then again, I expected the conservative media to turn up the heat on Trump.  It didn&#039;t, for the most part.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Neo &#8211; the MSM seem to have been keeping their powder dry, so to speak, re:  Trump.  </p>
<p>That could be a function of where they get their research from.?</p>
<p>Yes, they&#8217;ve been negative.  The negative has to be in comparison / relative to something &#8211; vs the other 16 candidates &#8211; not much; &#8211; vs Clinton &#8211; more noticeable.   </p>
<p>There is also a volume of time dimension &#8211; they&#8217;ve essentially given Trump a LOT of airtime himself &#8211; almost shutting out the other 16 candidates, and, importantly, much of the bad news for Clinton/Obama.</p>
<p>No doubt, when the Dems finally declare Clinton their candidate (essentially after tomorrow), look to the Dem machine turning its sights on Trump.  They will have oppo information and related narratives that they will be feeding to the MSM in various ways.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy the idea that the MSM are so beholding to ratings that they&#8217;d rather Trump win.  Bias will probably win the day as they still have to live here.</p>
<p>But, then again, I expected the conservative media to turn up the heat on Trump.  It didn&#8217;t, for the most part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
