<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Decisions, decisions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Big Maq		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1225099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Maq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1225099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Cornhead - you hardly make the case FOR Trump nor against Clinton.

First, we suspect her of many things not yet proven, and have for years been reflexively anti Democrat.  So, we flippantly say she is &quot;dangerous&quot;, and a &quot;criminal&quot;.

What does seem likely with Clinton as POTUS, we&#039;d see four more years of Obama-like presidency...

A disaster?  No - we need only look at the large European nations to see where that leads.  

And, unlike Obama, she did vote for the Iraq war.  How independent was she as SecState?  Probably not much, at least on the big policy issues (e.g. Obama&#039;s Red Line).  Still, she was a &quot;realist hawk&quot; in the administration (e.g. allying with SecDef Gates on Afghanistan surge).
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-04-03/clinton-legacy

Definitely the wrong leftward direction, to be sure, but hardly a disaster in the next four years.

What is most galling are all the questions of impropriety surrounding her and that she could possibly be &quot;rewarded&quot; with the POTUS and avoid any recrimination, if not criminal charges.  

That IS a hard pill to swallow for us all.

About the only thing Trump has going for him is that he is flying the GOP flag.  

But if he is so &quot;Pragmatic&quot; (as a commenter elsewhere put it) as to have no discernible path forward, as he is so &quot;mutable&quot; (great word used by Neo), that flag is rendered meaningless.  

So then, What ARE we going to get? Who knows?

Throw in his reaction over even the smallest of disagreements or challenges, his lack of transparency, his lies when there isn&#039;t even an advantage to do so, his hints at Authoritarianism, and his &quot;pragmatism&quot; around Constitutional limitations to presidential power, what should that tell us?

Short of a third party candidate winning, it looks like a choice between four more years of rot  vs taking a chance on Base Jumping off a cliff with a guy who hasn&#039;t done it, doesn&#039;t seem to know what is required, doesn&#039;t have a clear path from A to point B, and seems prone to make random leaps.

&quot;Chemotherapy&quot; is a extremely well tested solution.  Trump is not even a close analog.

The downside tail risk is orders of magnitude greater with Trump than with Clinton.

What to do?  These two are not the only choices we have.

Vote Libertarian and down ticket GOP.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cornhead &#8211; you hardly make the case FOR Trump nor against Clinton.</p>
<p>First, we suspect her of many things not yet proven, and have for years been reflexively anti Democrat.  So, we flippantly say she is &#8220;dangerous&#8221;, and a &#8220;criminal&#8221;.</p>
<p>What does seem likely with Clinton as POTUS, we&#8217;d see four more years of Obama-like presidency&#8230;</p>
<p>A disaster?  No &#8211; we need only look at the large European nations to see where that leads.  </p>
<p>And, unlike Obama, she did vote for the Iraq war.  How independent was she as SecState?  Probably not much, at least on the big policy issues (e.g. Obama&#8217;s Red Line).  Still, she was a &#8220;realist hawk&#8221; in the administration (e.g. allying with SecDef Gates on Afghanistan surge).<br />
<a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-04-03/clinton-legacy" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-04-03/clinton-legacy</a></p>
<p>Definitely the wrong leftward direction, to be sure, but hardly a disaster in the next four years.</p>
<p>What is most galling are all the questions of impropriety surrounding her and that she could possibly be &#8220;rewarded&#8221; with the POTUS and avoid any recrimination, if not criminal charges.  </p>
<p>That IS a hard pill to swallow for us all.</p>
<p>About the only thing Trump has going for him is that he is flying the GOP flag.  </p>
<p>But if he is so &#8220;Pragmatic&#8221; (as a commenter elsewhere put it) as to have no discernible path forward, as he is so &#8220;mutable&#8221; (great word used by Neo), that flag is rendered meaningless.  </p>
<p>So then, What ARE we going to get? Who knows?</p>
<p>Throw in his reaction over even the smallest of disagreements or challenges, his lack of transparency, his lies when there isn&#8217;t even an advantage to do so, his hints at Authoritarianism, and his &#8220;pragmatism&#8221; around Constitutional limitations to presidential power, what should that tell us?</p>
<p>Short of a third party candidate winning, it looks like a choice between four more years of rot  vs taking a chance on Base Jumping off a cliff with a guy who hasn&#8217;t done it, doesn&#8217;t seem to know what is required, doesn&#8217;t have a clear path from A to point B, and seems prone to make random leaps.</p>
<p>&#8220;Chemotherapy&#8221; is a extremely well tested solution.  Trump is not even a close analog.</p>
<p>The downside tail risk is orders of magnitude greater with Trump than with Clinton.</p>
<p>What to do?  These two are not the only choices we have.</p>
<p>Vote Libertarian and down ticket GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: redc1c4		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1223207</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redc1c4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1223207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[as seen on FB: Brian Tresp Many realize that Trump is chemotherapy. You normally wouldn&#039;t choose to take it, but at this point it&#039;s the only way to kill the cancer.
---
i&#039;m not that fond of Trump, but given the choice between him &#038; Shrillery, it&#039;s not even close.

that&#039;s why i&#039;m voting for Bernie Tuesday, hoping to help her lose here in #Failifornia, and why i&#039;ll be voting for Trump in November.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as seen on FB: Brian Tresp Many realize that Trump is chemotherapy. You normally wouldn&#8217;t choose to take it, but at this point it&#8217;s the only way to kill the cancer.<br />
&#8212;<br />
i&#8217;m not that fond of Trump, but given the choice between him &amp; Shrillery, it&#8217;s not even close.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s why i&#8217;m voting for Bernie Tuesday, hoping to help her lose here in #Failifornia, and why i&#8217;ll be voting for Trump in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kyndyll G		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1218241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyndyll G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1218241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Art, honestly, speaking as a politically conservative woman who opted not to have kids for a variety of reasons, we, humankind, have evolved beyond the point where our only purpose for existence is reproduction. The problem is not fully evolved people choosing to have a sensible and responsible number of children, the problem is third-worlders being subsidized to have all the kids they can. The solution is to stop subsidizing them, not to get into a breeding-like-rabbits contest with them.

Hundreds of years ago, the first world began to move away from conditions that favored the breed-til-you-die-in-childbirth scenario that you seem to favor. With longer lifespans and drastically reduced infant and child mortality, you don&#039;t need to spew babies in hopes that one or two survive to adulthood. With automation, you don&#039;t need masses of people to labor - in fact masses of people simply mean masses of unemployment. 

Democrats want masses. Unhappy masses. Poor masses. That&#039;s why they want poor third worlders having large numbers of children on the dime of what remains of the first world&#039;s middle class. Attack the right villain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art, honestly, speaking as a politically conservative woman who opted not to have kids for a variety of reasons, we, humankind, have evolved beyond the point where our only purpose for existence is reproduction. The problem is not fully evolved people choosing to have a sensible and responsible number of children, the problem is third-worlders being subsidized to have all the kids they can. The solution is to stop subsidizing them, not to get into a breeding-like-rabbits contest with them.</p>
<p>Hundreds of years ago, the first world began to move away from conditions that favored the breed-til-you-die-in-childbirth scenario that you seem to favor. With longer lifespans and drastically reduced infant and child mortality, you don&#8217;t need to spew babies in hopes that one or two survive to adulthood. With automation, you don&#8217;t need masses of people to labor &#8211; in fact masses of people simply mean masses of unemployment. </p>
<p>Democrats want masses. Unhappy masses. Poor masses. That&#8217;s why they want poor third worlders having large numbers of children on the dime of what remains of the first world&#8217;s middle class. Attack the right villain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Saunders		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1217718</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1217718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[F - Biden is being held in readiness to drop in when the Evil Empress is indicted.  Only question the Dems are  still deciding is whether the indictment and replacement should be before or after the convention.

Neo -- friend of mine says he&#039;s going to make a billion dollars selling barf-bags outside the polling places.  I said, &quot;Hell, no!  I&#039;m getting there first with my patented clothespins with padding on the tips, so they don&#039;t hurt your nose!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F &#8211; Biden is being held in readiness to drop in when the Evil Empress is indicted.  Only question the Dems are  still deciding is whether the indictment and replacement should be before or after the convention.</p>
<p>Neo &#8212; friend of mine says he&#8217;s going to make a billion dollars selling barf-bags outside the polling places.  I said, &#8220;Hell, no!  I&#8217;m getting there first with my patented clothespins with padding on the tips, so they don&#8217;t hurt your nose!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1217568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1217568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Belmont Club
Greetings, Slaves
PJ Media... 

Perhaps the first major 20th century writer to realize that the ambition of all true Communists should be to become billionaire revolutionaries was Hilaire Belloc. In his 1912 book, The Servile State, Belloc argued the then-burgeoning Communist movement would find more success ditching Leninism in favor of an alliance with Crony Capitalists to reinstate Slavery. &quot;Slavery, or a Servile State in which those who do not own the means of production shall be legally compelled to work for those who do, and shall receive in exchange a security of livelihood.&quot;

This modern form of slavery would address not only the concerns of the revolutionaries by fixing job insecurity and guaranteeing retirement on a plantation basis, but also assuage the monopolists, who stay up nights worrying about preserving market share in the face of competition. An alliance between socialists and crony capitalists would solve both problems at once. The only price to pay for this convenience is the loss of public freedom and that is readily paid.

As for the rest, it would be sustainable. The crony capitalists would underwrite the projects of the collectivists. The ant-heaps of each would be so similar to the other that only a few changes in signage would be needed to turn regulated capitalism into the workers&#039; paradise. It was a tremendous insight. Belloc realized Bolshevism was was too obviously destructive to last and anticipated the rise of what we would now call the Blue Model. F.A. Hayek paid tribute: &quot;Hilaire Belloc ... explained that the effects of Socialist doctrine on Capitalist society is to produce a third thing different from either of its two begetters - to wit, the Servile State.&quot; Regarding the Servile State, George Orwell realized whatever name it gave itself, such an unholy alliance would be much the same quantity.

Many earlier writers have foreseen the emergence of a new kind of society, neither capitalist nor Socialist, and probably based upon slavery ... A good example is Hilaire Belloc&#039;s book, The Servile State ...  Jack London, in The Iron Heel ... Wells&#039;s The Sleeper Awakes (1900) ... Aldous Huxley&#039;s Brave New World (1930), all described imaginary worlds in which the special problems of capitalism had been solved without bringing liberty, equality, or true happiness any nearer. More recently, writers like Peter Drucker and F.A. Voigt have argued that Fascism and Communism are substantially the same thing. And indeed, it has always been obvious that a planned and centralized society is liable to develop into an oligarchy or a dictatorship.

The crucial point would be that this proposed Third Way would be more secure than the traditional Leninsim which rested upon the unholy Troika of Party, Army and Cheka. Paychecks would actually be met, courtesy of the crony capitalists. It&#039;s not surprising that after the collapse of the Soviets, the next collectivist social project was the much more &quot;responsible&quot; EU. But Larry Elliott, arguing in the Guardian for a British exit from Brussels, realized that distinction was more a matter of degree than substance. He characterized the EU not as &quot;the US without the electric chair; it is the USSR without the gulag.&quot;  The correspondence with Belloc&#039;s 1912 prediction is eerie.

Belloc argued that the only two exits from the evils of crony capitalism were an expansion of property holdings to the great majority of the people (the classic conservative program) or collectivism. Of the two alternatives, the elites would find collectivism far the easier path. He wrote, &quot;if you are suffering because property is restricted to a few, you can alter that factor in the problem either by putting property in the hands of many or the hands of none ... a trust or monopoly is welcomed because it &#039;furnishes a mode of transition from private to public ownership.&#039;&quot; Crony capitalism furnishes collectivism so well that the Servile State becomes indistinguishable from the Workers&#039; Paradise and its leaders equally interchangeable. Thus we have billionaires who become men of the people and men of the people who become billionaires. Who could have foreseen this in 1912?

https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2016/05/21/greetings-slaves/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belmont Club<br />
Greetings, Slaves<br />
PJ Media&#8230; </p>
<p>Perhaps the first major 20th century writer to realize that the ambition of all true Communists should be to become billionaire revolutionaries was Hilaire Belloc. In his 1912 book, The Servile State, Belloc argued the then-burgeoning Communist movement would find more success ditching Leninism in favor of an alliance with Crony Capitalists to reinstate Slavery. &#8220;Slavery, or a Servile State in which those who do not own the means of production shall be legally compelled to work for those who do, and shall receive in exchange a security of livelihood.&#8221;</p>
<p>This modern form of slavery would address not only the concerns of the revolutionaries by fixing job insecurity and guaranteeing retirement on a plantation basis, but also assuage the monopolists, who stay up nights worrying about preserving market share in the face of competition. An alliance between socialists and crony capitalists would solve both problems at once. The only price to pay for this convenience is the loss of public freedom and that is readily paid.</p>
<p>As for the rest, it would be sustainable. The crony capitalists would underwrite the projects of the collectivists. The ant-heaps of each would be so similar to the other that only a few changes in signage would be needed to turn regulated capitalism into the workers&#8217; paradise. It was a tremendous insight. Belloc realized Bolshevism was was too obviously destructive to last and anticipated the rise of what we would now call the Blue Model. F.A. Hayek paid tribute: &#8220;Hilaire Belloc &#8230; explained that the effects of Socialist doctrine on Capitalist society is to produce a third thing different from either of its two begetters &#8211; to wit, the Servile State.&#8221; Regarding the Servile State, George Orwell realized whatever name it gave itself, such an unholy alliance would be much the same quantity.</p>
<p>Many earlier writers have foreseen the emergence of a new kind of society, neither capitalist nor Socialist, and probably based upon slavery &#8230; A good example is Hilaire Belloc&#8217;s book, The Servile State &#8230;  Jack London, in The Iron Heel &#8230; Wells&#8217;s The Sleeper Awakes (1900) &#8230; Aldous Huxley&#8217;s Brave New World (1930), all described imaginary worlds in which the special problems of capitalism had been solved without bringing liberty, equality, or true happiness any nearer. More recently, writers like Peter Drucker and F.A. Voigt have argued that Fascism and Communism are substantially the same thing. And indeed, it has always been obvious that a planned and centralized society is liable to develop into an oligarchy or a dictatorship.</p>
<p>The crucial point would be that this proposed Third Way would be more secure than the traditional Leninsim which rested upon the unholy Troika of Party, Army and Cheka. Paychecks would actually be met, courtesy of the crony capitalists. It&#8217;s not surprising that after the collapse of the Soviets, the next collectivist social project was the much more &#8220;responsible&#8221; EU. But Larry Elliott, arguing in the Guardian for a British exit from Brussels, realized that distinction was more a matter of degree than substance. He characterized the EU not as &#8220;the US without the electric chair; it is the USSR without the gulag.&#8221;  The correspondence with Belloc&#8217;s 1912 prediction is eerie.</p>
<p>Belloc argued that the only two exits from the evils of crony capitalism were an expansion of property holdings to the great majority of the people (the classic conservative program) or collectivism. Of the two alternatives, the elites would find collectivism far the easier path. He wrote, &#8220;if you are suffering because property is restricted to a few, you can alter that factor in the problem either by putting property in the hands of many or the hands of none &#8230; a trust or monopoly is welcomed because it &#8216;furnishes a mode of transition from private to public ownership.'&#8221; Crony capitalism furnishes collectivism so well that the Servile State becomes indistinguishable from the Workers&#8217; Paradise and its leaders equally interchangeable. Thus we have billionaires who become men of the people and men of the people who become billionaires. Who could have foreseen this in 1912?</p>
<p><a href="https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2016/05/21/greetings-slaves/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2016/05/21/greetings-slaves/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1217558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1217558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its interesting the images, and videos, and the statements of the mayor blaming trump for the behavior of people yelling california is mexico, and such like this

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/06/Trump-San-Jose-1-Joel-Pollak-640x480.jpg

&quot;Trump this is Mexico
You are not welcome on native/mexican soil&quot;

funny, but i thought spain was part of europe, and they speak spanish... hmmmmm... 

Trump just doesn&#039;t bother with the intellectuals.  That&#039;s why Kagan and Co. find fault with him.  But Bill Buckley was similarly disrespectful: &quot;I would rather be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand people on the faculty of Harvard University.&quot; -- JR


Trump = Hitler
http://d1jrw5jterzxwu.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/default/files/uploads/trump_hitler.jpg

The Trump equals fascism charge is wrong, reckless and dangerous
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“This is how fascism comes to America.” So reads the alarmist, provocative headline from the Brookings Institution’s Robert Kagan writing for the Washington Post that the Republican nomination of Donald Trump is essentially the modern equivalent of Hitler and Mussolini’s rise to power.

It’s the 1930s all over again, wouldn’t you know. Besides being fallacious, Kagan’s charge – and that of many, many other commentators – is reckless and irresponsible. Even dangerous.

Let’s leave aside the facts that Trump’s son-in-law is Jewish, and that his daughter converted to Judaism, both of whom Trump fully embraces. Or that he opened up the Palm Beach mansion and golf course Mar-a-Lago to Jews and blacks at a time when segregation at all-white country clubs in the south was still a thing, long before he ever set foot in the political arena. So, gee, what the heck does Trump running for president have to do with the racist, anti-Semitic ideology of the Nazis? Those examples are too easy.

Getting to the heart of Kagan’s case, he writes, “Fascist movements, too, [like Trump] had no coherent ideology, no clear set of prescriptions for what ailed society.”

In reality, fascism is the textbook example of an abominable, antidemocratic ideology run amuck, that believed one ruler could embody the entire will of the nation. But there was more to it than that. Combined with its national destiny mythos, racist doctrines and corporatist economic programs – war is profitable! – its coherence and rigid execution was directly responsible for the deaths of 60 million people, many through mass genocide, in the war the fascists and militarists started in the 1930s and 1940s.&lt;/blockquote&gt; http://netrightdaily.com/2016/06/trump-equals-fascism-charge-wrong-reckless-dangerous/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting the images, and videos, and the statements of the mayor blaming trump for the behavior of people yelling california is mexico, and such like this</p>
<p><a href="http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/06/Trump-San-Jose-1-Joel-Pollak-640x480.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/06/Trump-San-Jose-1-Joel-Pollak-640&#215;480.jpg</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Trump this is Mexico<br />
You are not welcome on native/mexican soil&#8221;</p>
<p>funny, but i thought spain was part of europe, and they speak spanish&#8230; hmmmmm&#8230; </p>
<p>Trump just doesn&#8217;t bother with the intellectuals.  That&#8217;s why Kagan and Co. find fault with him.  But Bill Buckley was similarly disrespectful: &#8220;I would rather be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand people on the faculty of Harvard University.&#8221; &#8212; JR</p>
<p>Trump = Hitler<br />
<a href="http://d1jrw5jterzxwu.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/default/files/uploads/trump_hitler.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://d1jrw5jterzxwu.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/default/files/uploads/trump_hitler.jpg</a></p>
<p>The Trump equals fascism charge is wrong, reckless and dangerous</p>
<blockquote><p>
“This is how fascism comes to America.” So reads the alarmist, provocative headline from the Brookings Institution’s Robert Kagan writing for the Washington Post that the Republican nomination of Donald Trump is essentially the modern equivalent of Hitler and Mussolini’s rise to power.</p>
<p>It’s the 1930s all over again, wouldn’t you know. Besides being fallacious, Kagan’s charge – and that of many, many other commentators – is reckless and irresponsible. Even dangerous.</p>
<p>Let’s leave aside the facts that Trump’s son-in-law is Jewish, and that his daughter converted to Judaism, both of whom Trump fully embraces. Or that he opened up the Palm Beach mansion and golf course Mar-a-Lago to Jews and blacks at a time when segregation at all-white country clubs in the south was still a thing, long before he ever set foot in the political arena. So, gee, what the heck does Trump running for president have to do with the racist, anti-Semitic ideology of the Nazis? Those examples are too easy.</p>
<p>Getting to the heart of Kagan’s case, he writes, “Fascist movements, too, [like Trump] had no coherent ideology, no clear set of prescriptions for what ailed society.”</p>
<p>In reality, fascism is the textbook example of an abominable, antidemocratic ideology run amuck, that believed one ruler could embody the entire will of the nation. But there was more to it than that. Combined with its national destiny mythos, racist doctrines and corporatist economic programs – war is profitable! – its coherence and rigid execution was directly responsible for the deaths of 60 million people, many through mass genocide, in the war the fascists and militarists started in the 1930s and 1940s.</p></blockquote>
<p> <a href="http://netrightdaily.com/2016/06/trump-equals-fascism-charge-wrong-reckless-dangerous/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://netrightdaily.com/2016/06/trump-equals-fascism-charge-wrong-reckless-dangerous/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KLSmith		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1217533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KLSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 16:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1217533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sharon W: the point of Ponnuru&#039;s article is that the lone voter does not have to choose. If one feels, as I do, that your vote is your imprimatur that neither candidate has earned - one individual vote does not matter enough to the outcome to necessitate violating one&#039;s conscience. Plus, most Republicans are hoping aboard the Trump train so I don&#039;t think he has to worry about whether I choose to vote.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon W: the point of Ponnuru&#8217;s article is that the lone voter does not have to choose. If one feels, as I do, that your vote is your imprimatur that neither candidate has earned &#8211; one individual vote does not matter enough to the outcome to necessitate violating one&#8217;s conscience. Plus, most Republicans are hoping aboard the Trump train so I don&#8217;t think he has to worry about whether I choose to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1217437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1217437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Record 94,708,000 Americans Not in Labor Force...

Only +38,000 jobs in May...

Lowest in 6 years...

Private sector puny +25,000...

OBama the Chavista is great, and so would his successor be!!! vote FOR the revolution!!!
Time for a CHANGE... 
Oppose Trump!!!!

&lt;b&gt;Teens Beat 78-Year-Old Woman in NYC Subway...&lt;/b&gt;

those pesky Amish teens. 
(though finally they have found a incident of white teens chasing someone who died of asthma... so after years of saying TEENS you get to see what happens when the TEENS are not suffering deficiency in pigmentation)

ILLEGALS SMUGGLED INTO USA FROM MIDDLE EAST...

CRAWL UNDER MEXICAN BORDER FENCE...

BBC blasted for rejecting work applicants because they are white! [here too in the US]

cant wait for the price controls.. 
the medical rationing
and more...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Record 94,708,000 Americans Not in Labor Force&#8230;</p>
<p>Only +38,000 jobs in May&#8230;</p>
<p>Lowest in 6 years&#8230;</p>
<p>Private sector puny +25,000&#8230;</p>
<p>OBama the Chavista is great, and so would his successor be!!! vote FOR the revolution!!!<br />
Time for a CHANGE&#8230;<br />
Oppose Trump!!!!</p>
<p><b>Teens Beat 78-Year-Old Woman in NYC Subway&#8230;</b></p>
<p>those pesky Amish teens.<br />
(though finally they have found a incident of white teens chasing someone who died of asthma&#8230; so after years of saying TEENS you get to see what happens when the TEENS are not suffering deficiency in pigmentation)</p>
<p>ILLEGALS SMUGGLED INTO USA FROM MIDDLE EAST&#8230;</p>
<p>CRAWL UNDER MEXICAN BORDER FENCE&#8230;</p>
<p>BBC blasted for rejecting work applicants because they are white! [here too in the US]</p>
<p>cant wait for the price controls..<br />
the medical rationing<br />
and more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1217420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1217420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Viewing America as an authoritarian, patriarchal, male-dominated society that tended to oppress women, children, and minorities, Hillary wrote a November 1973 article for the Harvard Educational Review advocating the liberation of children from &quot;the empire of the father.&quot; She claimed that the traditional nuclear family structure often undermined the best interests of children, who &quot;consequently need social institutions specifically designed to safeguard their position.&quot; &quot;Along with the family,&quot; she elaborated, &quot;past and present examples of such arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian Reservation system.&quot; She added: &quot;Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease, or employment, and others where the decision or lack of one will significantly affect a child&#039;s future should not be made unilaterally by parents.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viewing America as an authoritarian, patriarchal, male-dominated society that tended to oppress women, children, and minorities, Hillary wrote a November 1973 article for the Harvard Educational Review advocating the liberation of children from &#8220;the empire of the father.&#8221; She claimed that the traditional nuclear family structure often undermined the best interests of children, who &#8220;consequently need social institutions specifically designed to safeguard their position.&#8221; &#8220;Along with the family,&#8221; she elaborated, &#8220;past and present examples of such arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian Reservation system.&#8221; She added: &#8220;Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease, or employment, and others where the decision or lack of one will significantly affect a child&#8217;s future should not be made unilaterally by parents.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Artfldgr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2016/06/02/decisions-decisions/#comment-1217418</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artfldgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=60129#comment-1217418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More non-Mexicans than Mexicans were apprehended at U.S. borders in 2014 PEW

Unauthorized immigrants from Mexico make up at least 75% of the total unauthorized immigrant population in 10 states: New Mexico (89%), Arizona (84%), Idaho (83%), Wyoming (82%), Colorado (78%), Oklahoma (76%), Wisconsin (76%), Kansas (75%), Oregon (75%) and Texas (75%).

&lt;b&gt;Mexican aliens seek to retake ‘stolen’ land&lt;/b&gt;
Washington Times
a reconquista, a radical movement calling for Mexico to “reconquer” America’s Southwest, has stepped out of the shadows at recent immigration-reform protests nationwide as marchers held signs saying, “Uncle Sam Stole Our Land!” and waved Mexico’s flag.

[and note the spaniards stole the land they live on now... or else they would speak something more akin to Aztec, not spanish]

&lt;b&gt;“We need to change direction,” said Jose Lugo, an instructor in Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder at a campus march last week. “And by allowing these 50,000, 50 million [immigrants] to come in here, we can do that.”&lt;/b&gt; (dont ya just LOVE intellectuals????)

“Demographically, socially and culturally, the reconquista of the Southwest United States by Mexico is well under way,” Harvard University professor Samuel P. Huntington said in 2004.  “No other immigrant group in U.S. history has asserted or could assert a historical claim to U.S. territory. Mexicans and Mexican-Americans can and do make that claim,” he said.

&lt;b&gt;“We are millions. We just have to survive. We have an aging white America. &lt;i&gt;They are not making babies.&lt;/i&gt; They are dying. It’s a matter of time. The explosion is in our population,” Jose Angel Gutierrez, political science professor at the University of Texas at Arlington&lt;/b&gt;

[yes, the feminists self exterminated and then sided with people who think the population they belong to shoudl not exist, while thinking somehow,they could contiue to exist and so on...]

Aztlan
MEChA
La Raza (the Race)
[edited for length by n-n]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More non-Mexicans than Mexicans were apprehended at U.S. borders in 2014 PEW</p>
<p>Unauthorized immigrants from Mexico make up at least 75% of the total unauthorized immigrant population in 10 states: New Mexico (89%), Arizona (84%), Idaho (83%), Wyoming (82%), Colorado (78%), Oklahoma (76%), Wisconsin (76%), Kansas (75%), Oregon (75%) and Texas (75%).</p>
<p><b>Mexican aliens seek to retake ‘stolen’ land</b><br />
Washington Times<br />
a reconquista, a radical movement calling for Mexico to “reconquer” America’s Southwest, has stepped out of the shadows at recent immigration-reform protests nationwide as marchers held signs saying, “Uncle Sam Stole Our Land!” and waved Mexico’s flag.</p>
<p>[and note the spaniards stole the land they live on now&#8230; or else they would speak something more akin to Aztec, not spanish]</p>
<p><b>“We need to change direction,” said Jose Lugo, an instructor in Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder at a campus march last week. “And by allowing these 50,000, 50 million [immigrants] to come in here, we can do that.”</b> (dont ya just LOVE intellectuals????)</p>
<p>“Demographically, socially and culturally, the reconquista of the Southwest United States by Mexico is well under way,” Harvard University professor Samuel P. Huntington said in 2004.  “No other immigrant group in U.S. history has asserted or could assert a historical claim to U.S. territory. Mexicans and Mexican-Americans can and do make that claim,” he said.</p>
<p><b>“We are millions. We just have to survive. We have an aging white America. <i>They are not making babies.</i> They are dying. It’s a matter of time. The explosion is in our population,” Jose Angel Gutierrez, political science professor at the University of Texas at Arlington</b></p>
<p>[yes, the feminists self exterminated and then sided with people who think the population they belong to shoudl not exist, while thinking somehow,they could contiue to exist and so on&#8230;]</p>
<p>Aztlan<br />
MEChA<br />
La Raza (the Race)<br />
[edited for length by n-n]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
