Just curious, but are you aware that Hillary Clinton has defended rapists before in court by attacking their victims as harlots and what not? Then laughed about it later when the supposed defendant was guilty and actually a rapist, not just alleged?

Clinton has no problems with forcible penetration. The only issue is whose family gets paid off or benefits.

The thing is, Broaddrick isn’t the only person Clinton had problems with.

Whereas the Left is an expert at digging up dirt on Republicans, and when they can’t find any, they will make them up, as they did with Herman Cain. The reason why the Left is very good at this is because more than half of all Democrat politicians have blackmail material on them concerning sexual affairs or incidents of one kind or another. They reach for this because it’s something Democrat operatives are experienced with.

Yeap, that’s what I was saying.

The impeachment was because lying under oath, not because of any rape. The sexual relation was consensual the whole time, there was no rape. Of course, lying under oath is a very serious crime, but it’s not the kind of crime that makes you a rapist, which is that Clinton is being called here.

No. The issue that lead to impeachment was lying under oath about it – the crime of Perjury.

…otherwise, I agree. There *is* a double standard that seems to be related to your politics.

It seems that if you go to court under a rape accusation what the judge should ask you is “who you voted for?”, and that’s enough to sentence.

That’s no better than the left did with Bill Cosby.

And that’s sad. Very sad.

Consider all the girl friends that JFK had – none accused him of anything untoward, but his brother Teddy wasn’t so lucky. Of course there was money to keep people quiet.

Then there was LBJ. A coarse man who engaged in extramarital relations, but manage to keep them quiet. Ford, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, and Bush 41 were all gentlemen who, as far as I know, didn’t cheat on their wives.

That brings us to Bill. He was a philanderer as Attorney general of Arkansas, and as Governor. I have no doubt that he made advances to many women who reciprocated in kind. He got over confident in his ability to overwhelm women who were “beneath” him. He used them like Kleenexes – they were disposable. His encounters with Broaddrick, Paula Jones, and Kathleen Willey didn’t turn out like so many of his other conquests. But such activities did not sink his political career because the Democrats considered it all “private,” and the voters bought it.

Joe Klein’s book, “Primary Colors,” was written about the Clinton campaign of 1992 and named the campaign worker who was responsible for suppressing “bimbo eruptions.” All with the overt knowledge of Hillary. The Clintons have had an “arrangement” for many, many years. For Hillary to claim she is a champion of women is much like the wife of criminal saying she is a champion of crime victims.

I have no doubt that Trump has had many affairs and girl friends. He may even have tried to force himself on some unwilling women. But so far none have accused him of that. If Bill’s affairs of libidinous nature are “private,” I see no reason why Trump’s aren’t private as well. Fair and balanced, right?

If you are not aware, EVERY top pol has a seriously enhanced sex drive — both sexes.

This enhancement comes from self-perception — from the brain.

So Bill’s DRIVE — from WAY back — would’ve been FAR higher than average Joe’s can imagine.

His impulse control would’ve been far weaker.

This reality crosses all cultures — and all times.

So I can’t imagine Bill not laying his hands on her.

The usual progression of his lust would have the babe submitting to him. The fact that she was married, yet cheating, complicates the equation.

The weight of the evidence is that Bill figured her to be a slut — and came onto her like a jon.

He felt — feels — no guilt whatsoever.

The rough sex DID occur.

For Bill, his victim was into ‘role play.’

Whereas for her, the episode is of shame and pain.

“No!” just didn’t mean anything. Bill was not, and is not, a self-limiting personality.

That campaign puts huge emphasis on women’s issues. We hear continually from the left about ‘rape culture’ and why women who might be victims must be heard. But not if her hubby – she recently said he would be in charge of running the economy – is the accused?

Crooked Hillary indeed.

Yes, I have the quaint habit of trying my best to apply the same standards to everyone, and not rush to judgment. I take every accuser with the same grain of salt. I have noticed that lying is not unheard of in these matters, on BOTH sides.