I believe you misunderstood my point about conspiracies.

There are most definitely global movements conspiratorially plotting all sorts of things. The far left is one of them that is very influential (and has been for a long, long time); there are others.

What I was referring to when I wrote “all of this” in this particular post was the candidates (especially the GOP candidates in this election—including Trump) saying what their goals are and perhaps not following through. That is what I say is not a conspiracy by a global elite, which is what “JuliB” has been insinuating.

its the kind of thing that would BLOW you away if you just cracked the right book or started at wiki and went from link to link to link…

dont expect the newspapers to let you in on it, those are pretty much all owned and run by either wealthy magnates, their families or one of six companies whose leaders push adjendas based on the meetings they had in the early part of last century to collude and do this to the public (for their own good of course)

let me know if you want to go down the rabbit hole of history and detail some of these historical figures, organizations, and such you dont know about, or may only know in passing if at all.

it will surely wake many up and surprise most.
🙂

The Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS) was a socialist student organization active from 1905—1921. It attracted many prominent intellectuals and writers and acted as an unofficial student wing of the Socialist Party of America. The Society sponsored lecture tours, magazines, seminars and discussion circles all over the US aimed at propagating socialist ideas among America’s college population. The group expanded into a philosophy in the 1920s that did not focus exclusively, or even primarily on college students. To symbolize the shift in emphasis, the group changed its name to the League for Industrial Democracy in 1921.

League being a symbol of their communist connection

The League for Industrial Democracy (LID) formerly the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, came into being in 1921 when members decided it was time to change the group’s name to become more inclusive, but also to reflect a new organizational perspective

after all their educational work happened and other organizations which had similar wolves taking over the thing and wearing the skins of the originals, it died and was revived by student social activism (As was the same in china leading up to MAO)

Its campus presence waned until the Great Depression of the 1930s led to an increase in radical student activism. The collegiate section was reorganized into an autonomous Student League for Industrial Democracy in 1933.

This merged with the Communist National Student League in 1935 to create the popular front American Student Union. LID activity on campus remained somewhat dormant until 1946, when the Student League for Industrial Democracy was reconstituted.

since they wanted to hide their communist conspiracy roots they cut off the term LEAGUE, which fooled everyone, including neo (we had an argument in the past that she didnt believe thats what it stood for)

The American Student Union (ASU) was a national left-wing organization of college students of the 1930s, best remembered for its protest activities against militarism. Founded by a 1935 merger of Communist and Socialist student organizations, the ASU was affiliated with the American Youth Congress.

but they merged… after they were investigaged for following the soviet party line and so on, like the CPUSA which we now know WAS Active in coordinating this and hundreds of other organizations… and steering donations around to fund them with the adversaries own money.

The Student League for Industrial Democracy (SLID) of 1946 to 1959 was the second incarnation of the League for Industrial Democracy’s student group. It changed its name to the Students for a Democratic Society on January 1, 1960, and severed its connection to the LID in 1965.
[edited for length by n-n]

He can try, but a sufficient competitive “activist campaign” goes to conservatives collectively to produce, not the GOP, not even a Republican president, to produce.

You’re correct that compatible politicians in office need a full-spectrum social activist movement to properly condition the political ecosystem in order to set the context that allows them to make a difference from their lane in government.

However, conservatives collectively, not the GOP, not even a Republican president, are responsible for reforming America’s social cultural/political context via head-on competition throughout the arena. Yet, except for a briefly hopeful burst with the Tea Party, conservatives have heretofore consistently failed to do their part with a sufficient competitive social activist movement and instead passed the buck and blamed the GOP for conservatives’ negligence.

If conservatives’ plan is to elect Cruz president but once again pass the buck to the GOP to “launch an activist campaign”, then they will lose again in the activist game.

For President Cruz to make a difference, conservatives must commit collectively, fully, zealously, and permanently to a social activist movement ASAP – as in time machine. They’re late, but since the activist game never ends, better late than never.

Their policy positions are only significant as signals to the various “tribes” that make up the electorate. People choose candidates based on tribal affiliation.

I won’t go so far as to say policies are unimportant, but imho the candidate’s character and basic motivations are more important because in the end, their 4-8 years in office will as often as not present them with events and challenges no one dreamed of during the election campaign, or at least no one understood their significance. How the Pres responds to those challenges is what is really important.

By that standard, all 5 remaining major party candidates fail miserably, and I will predict that no matter which one eventually wins, we are in for another very rocky 4 years with poor leadership, befuddled by events.

Cruz expects to lobby the nation to repeal the Income Tax amendment.

“Repeal the IRS” is salesmanship — branding — of the concept of getting the IRS out of our personal lives. Obviously some organ will remain to collect the VAT, excise taxes, tariffs.

With the advent of social media and digital commerce this is now an essential for a democratic republic to continue.

&&&&&&

Tariffs in a fiat world are necessary for the economic health of the nation — as fiat currency can be — and is — gamed to replaced tariff walls.

At least with a tariff you can aim your policy to this or that nation.

Fiat currency wars bounce all over the globe.

As the central ‘Atlas’ of the global structure, America can’t game its own currency without causing chaos.

thats cause its in the open and you dont do the research behind such, and ignore the things that you would use to conclude such. and add the impossible monolithic word to it as it doesnt exist unless chinese communists and russians work together, etc.

in fact when people who are part of it, change sides, and become changers like you, you ignore what they reveal!!!!!!!!! you dont pay attention to things that reveal things, and you refuse to accept the nefarious people and that they can organize over 100 years of actions, despite having seen or visited gothic cathedrals that take longer to make. you even ignore congressional testimony

so if you cherry pick, no your not going to believe what you dont want to believe, wont accept, etc.

“In the 1930s we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within. The idea was for these men to be ordained, and then climb the ladder of influence and authority as Monsignors and Bishops”” “Right now they are in the highest places in the Church”

and what kind of pope do we have now (since the soviets tried to assasinate one, replacing them by controlling the vote works better, dont you think)? sounds like kiril and the socialist world federation of churches… a facet of what you dont believe.

one thing you dont get about how it works is that its about influence, not about direct control.

In 1953, she testified before the US Senate about widespread Party infiltration of labor unions and other institutions. On March 11, 1953, The New York Times ran a front page article entitled “Bella Dodd Asserts Reds Got Presidential Advisory Posts.” The article reported that Dodd “swore before the Senate Internal Security subcommittee today that Communists had got into many legislative offices of Congress and into a number of groups advising the President of the United States.

1954 that Bella Dodd “…warned yesterday that the ‘materialistic philosophy,’ [i.e., dialectical materialism ] which she said was now guiding public education, would eventually demoralize the nation.”

she told ya what was going to happen 50 years later.
so did yru bezmenov, mitrhokhin, jan sejna, A Goliytsin, and about 40 or 50 more… some of them admitting they were part of said plan…

and here are her creds:
Dodd was an organizer for the CPUSA from 1932—1948, and from 1944 to ’48 sat on the CPUSA’s National Council. She also served as head of the New York State Teachers Union. She was expelled from the CPUSA in 1949

ALL IGNORED, and ignored here over and over.
we are programmed to ignore it… we fear what would happen to our reputation for not being politically correct and saying what we are supposed to say.

tons and tons of stuff… from the testimony of erin pizzy as to who took over the womens movement before she and her kids had to flee england or be murdered.
[edited for length by n-n]

There are differences among the various candidates, but none of them is particularly honest. So that should not be a factor in deciding how to vote.

In the mean time I’ll just quietly sit here turning blue waiting for Neo’s column on the happenings in Colorado.