The irony in that statement is palpable. For someone who is arguing in favor of a religion which beheads people for leaving the group to lecture us about being open minded is obscene. Next “Japan” will probably tell us to keep our heads on straight.

Incidentally “Japan” didn’t refute the fact that ISIS is Islamic in every way. Let me help “Japan” out here. ISIS could be considered a modern kharijite group. Most Muslims object to the kharijites because they chop off the heads of other Muslims whom they consider apostates instead of limiting the head chopping to Christians, Jews, Yazidis, and Hindus like proper Muslims. The problem with that argument is that kharijites have been an integral part of Islam from the beginning of the Islamic empire. From the perspective of non-Muslims whether the Muslim who chops off his head is a kharijite or not is irrelevant.

The facts are, that during the 350-year hiatus in Islam’s war against the rest of the world, beginning in 1638, nobody gave a damn about Muslims unless they were attacking us — see, e.g., the Barbary Pirates. No one gave a damn about Muslims until they again started attacking the West in the 1960s. And no one in the West would give a damn about Muslims if they simply went about their lives and stopped murdering people.

There’s no irrational fear of Islam, there is a perfectly rational understanding that 25-35% or more of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims — that’s between 400 and 560 million people! — actively want to impose Islam on the rest of the world, and 10% of them — that’s between 40 million and 56 million people! — are willing to kill to achieve that goal, which is urged upon them by hundreds of thousands of their religious leaders, and which is fully justified in their religious texts. Furthermore, not only do we have no way of knowing which among the world’s Muslims those 25-35% are, but we do know that any one, two, or dozen is perfectly capable of self-radicalization, and suddenly arriving to machine gun his co-workers.

You want to call worrying about those facts an “irrational fear of Islam,” go right ahead — we call it self-preservation.

What am standing of is you should never punish the innocent for the acts of the guilty. This remind us to the treatment of J Europe’s Jews late 1800 that case most of them to seek and immigrated to another places for save haven and start new life.

Does that made you to think same about the problem with Christianity, was it a phobia?
What I think the west need to be very firm and harsh judgement to that “foreign or strange” kind group and its very fair to those who “want to institute Sharia in the west” to apply on them firstly when they caught red-handed with terrorists acts. As Sharia institute chop their head.
For example some “bad apples” they should been brought to Sharia law and they want to institute Sharia in the west:
1- Abu Qatada
http://www.theguardian.com/world/abu-qatada
2- Abu Hamza Almasri
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2634198/Hamza-We-mistake-treating-jailed-hate-cleric-ranter-real-threat-admits-former-chief-prosecutor.html
3- Anjem Choudary: the British extremist who backs the caliphate
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/07/anjem-choudary-islamic-state-isis

Richard Saunders,
When OBL recruited in Afghanistan, he was doing exactly detonate their suicide vests. Murderers don’t slice off their victims’ heads, “In the name of Allah, the merciful, the compassionate . . .” against the “Christen believers” Afghanistan invaders, the Russians.

I still on my words ““Facts are better than dreams.” .

The only thing we can hope for is that he (or she) goes back to his (or her) home planet — and takes all of our Muslims with him (or her).

What! Is this some type of riddle like “Who is buried in Grant’s tomb? After all, ISIS is for Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham. The word Islamic is the adjective form of Islam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEnWw_lH4tQ