I think Roberts will rule against Obama on this one.

Stevens, on the other hand, is more of a coin toss. My guess (my fear) is that he’ll support Obama, because he wants to be nice to illegal immigrants.

The reason I say Roberts won’t go for the liberal line here is that I’ve detected a pattern in Roberts’ defections, and the summary version (someday I may write a post on this) is that he doesn’t like to do anything too drastic to overrule something Congress has done. This does not fall into that category; this is executive overreach, and I think he’d find it so.

I guess it will all be revealed in the fullness of time.

When you see stuff like this it’s hard to chock down that these people are allowed to vote!

These are not trailer trash rednecks.

As we saw in lower courts, he was busy approving green cards for a large group of immigrants at the exact same time his lawyer was telling the judge that he would do no such thing. Obama has months to continue with his unprecedented acceptance of illegal immigrants, and even if SCOTUS rules against him, there’s no track record that indicates he will obey their ruling.

God, I pray that Cruz can rise above the crap and get the nod.

Either pro- or con-, they’re going out of their way to deliver a message.

I am not stating that if the SCOTUS rules in favor of Obama that it will make Obama… a Caesar. I am saying it makes an American ‘Caesar’, an inescapable future reality.

Either way, he’s a tyrant.

Indeed, it’s importance cannot be over emphasized. The future of the republic may well rest upon it, for while a ruling against Obama will not in and of itself save the republic… a ruling that the President may make law, in effect what a supportive ruling would find, would be the equivalent of when Caesar in Rome declared himself ‘el presidente’ for life.