A question that doesn’t even need an answer.

Patterico—Patterico’s Ponfifications—had a piece wondering where the German men were. Shouldn’t they have been defending the women?

One possibility listed is that German society has finally succeeded in raising an entire generation of men without chests.

The latter possibility gets much speculation on a web site I’m active on.

But to the first question, many of the women were either alone or else among female friends.

If there were men, given a tightly packed and numerous crowd of men, a BF can be isolated and physically intimidated.

By one report in the German media, out of over 600 complaints, sexual assault may have only been around 40% of them.

In other words, molestation may have been the aim of the “game,” but general mayhem and brutality constituted most of it – aimed not just at females.

After a great many posts on over 200 hundred pages on a BB on the Hijrah – the Muslim invasion – one German “Parzival” in Bavaria is already planning to either leave or join the resistance.

Only two months ago, he thought Germany would muddle through.

People on the website, mostly Americans, but Brits and others as well – are alarmed and worried.

Back to the Chesterton question of “chests,” as Daniel Johnson writes at Mosaic about “Does Europe Have a Future?” – it is a “race against time:” Can Muslims be assimilated by Europe before Europe is Islamized?

http://mosaicmagazine.com/essay/2016/01/does-europe-have-a-future/

Gang rape is used as a policy tool by dictators in the Third World — A LOT.

It’s standard practice against every female sentenced to death in Iran.

Saddam had a platoon at the ready — making sure that the larger public knew what awaited those who riled him.

“Western governments do not seem to understand is that it is their obligation – arguably, their first and most important obligation – to keep their citizens safe.”

Leftist government’s foremost obligation is the indoctrination and control of their citizens. Citizen safety is only of concern if it forwards the narrative.

“I can imagine groups of female concealed-carriers, perhaps wearing tight T-shirts with an Arabic phrase meaning “Taharrush Eaters”, patrolling at public events.”

Any such attempt, in fact, other than running away, any attempt at defense will result in, at the least a failure to prosecute the perp and at worst, prosecution of the victim. After all, former AG Holder has already informed us that we all “have a duty to retreat”.

Did anybody check Koln’s jails to see what the mix of Muslim dark boys were to native white Saxon faces?

Because if their police are like our police, they’ll just arrest everybody in sight, who is fighting, no holds barred. Including the ones who may be defending themselves.

They shouldn’t be able to hold them past 24 hours, but that might explain why their jails were too full and why the Muslims outside had freer reign.

What Western governments do not seem to understand is that it is their obligation — arguably, their first and most important obligation — to keep their citizens safe. A government that cannot do so has no reason for existing, and is ripe for overthrow. In the meantime, if the governments will not punish these outrageous acts, vigilantes will. (I believe we’re already starting to see that in Europe.)

If this ever comes to America’s shores, I can imagine groups of female concealed-carriers, perhaps wearing tight T-shirts with an Arabic phrase meaning “Taharrush Eaters”, patrolling at public events. As Geoffrey Britain says, this may well have the purpose of teaching people what public behavior is considered acceptable… but such teaching can go in the other direction too. (The attackers of Pamela Geller learned that the hard way.)

Treat them as an internet trojan/virus/back door root kit. Don’t even let them through the door of the firewall. Close off all avenues.

Don’t agree with it. Don’t disagree with. The moment you disagree or agree with it, you’re thinking about it in the language it was written to target, and it’s already past the first barrier. That is the power of the Left.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ilFbbk9jw4

Good thing I have a blog archive of this stuff, otherwise my bookmarks would be 50 miles long.

“This is social conditioning, ensuring that women are fearful of going out in public unescorted.” Lizzy

Lizzy correctly identifies this as social conditioning but IMO, women then becoming fearful of going out in public unescorted is a necessary condition to achievement of taharrush’s strategic purpose. Which is prefatory conditioning of both non-Muslim women and men for incremental acceptance of dhimmitude.

In highly pacifistic societies like Sweden and Norway, Taharrush is followed by established Muslim rape gangs. Islam has a variety (Rotherdam) of tried and true methods for establishing ever deeper levels of dhimmitude in a targeted society.