You have your old stars, but new ones are always there to replace them. In opera, it was Placido Domingo and Luigi Pavarotti. Today, it is Dmitri Aleksandrovich Hvorostovsky, a stunning baritone who knocks the socks out of everything he sings. Here he is doing Figaro.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85kFY4D55oE

Confidence, poise, vocal placement, and a great voice.

ask easier questions.. these are too hard to answer in the space allowed… not to mention that the answer is not pc

Thanks to marxism and equalist feminism, and racialism, this is a dead artform. it shows clearly that some actually have more talent than others, and that is evil… so its dying out… and wont survive this century any more than the old dances of the time of henry the 8th exist today other than displays of old junk….

sad..

but hey, that was when others ruled the world and wanted constant improvement and uplifting art, and thought merit was best…

thats ended in 1968, and ballet wont last another 50 years other than as a remnant of patriarchal times gone by…

sure… back in the days your thinking of, merit ruled. but as long as merit ruled, women could not compete and win, so they forced the standards to be lower so that they could be equal. they decided their mates were evil oppressors, and kicked husbands out for the BBD of the state…

flash forwards years later, and who would teach a child to respect adults? adults are oppressors of children and dont want them to have sex. you cant treat people with respect, thats not real, and besides, hetronormative families are evil and give children the abilty to have manners and so on

from the time feminism took over, they have rotted out the family till the point was not to have a family any more… just read their quotes and realize they mean it, taught it, changed it, and solidified it…

merit is a myth.. beiung polite is a lie
being a feral child is now the norm.
just read what the future is telling you!!!

Reinforcing male privilege: The Trudeau cabinet, Andrew Coyne, and the mythology of ‘merit’
http://www.feministcurrent.com/2015/11/04/reinforcing-male-privilege-the-trudeau-cabinet-andrew-coyne-and-the-mythology-of-merit/

from geek feminism
Questioning the merit of meritocracy.
http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/29/questioning-the-merit-of-meritocracy/

In short: meritocracy benefits not only those with skill and ability, but with the self-confidence to demonstrate their skill publicly and demand recognition for it. And self-confidence is highly gendered.

basically if they can win, its fair, but if they lose it myst be unfair and the standards are aainst then, otherwise they would win… so the losers invent ways to make winners cheaters and so negate their wins, marginalize their work, use affirmative action to deny them employment, and more..
[edited for length by n-n]

Can Somebody Explain The Loathing Of The Successful To Me? Why Don’t Kids Address Adults as Mr. and Mrs. Anymore? "Extreme Ballet" Light rail: The $600 million Edmonton train that snarls traffic, slows down transit times and increases em

I think the expressiveness comes first, but is improved with mastery of technique. The expressiveness is like story in literature, as opposed to writing ability. I’ve read poorly written books that still carried me through to the end because of the story, but well written books without a good story… somehow I never get around to picking them again up after the first couple of chapters. “Literary” works often suffer the dull story defect.