Comments on: What with this “schlonged” business? https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/ A blog about political change, among other things Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:56:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: neo-neocon https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948633 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:04:59 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948633 K-E:

The Ron Paul joke was just that, a joke.

My actual point was in the post about Romney’s very enthusiastic, very motivated crowds during the general in 2012, and also the history of crowds for Mondale et al.

McGovern’s voters/crowds were incredibly enthusiastic, as were Eugene McCarthy’s—incredibly so. It didn’t matter.

And citing polls to backup the discussion of enthusiasm is to stop talking about enthusiasm. Polls are polls, and they definitely indicate something. What they indicate with Trump is that he has approximately 1/3 of the Republican electorate behind him. That’s not only not enough to win the nomination (especially if and when other candidates drop out), although it could be built on and he could end up being nominated—it is most definitely not enough to win an election, where the polls are not at all good for him. What’s more, if you think about it, 1/3 of Republicans is a LOT of people. That could fill quite a stadium, and the people might be very enthusiastic. But it means nothing in terms of winning the election. And I say that not just for Trump, but for anyone running and drawing big enthusiastic crowds.

]]> By: n.n https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948631 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:59:42 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948631 Clinton was indeed schlonged by the Obama faction. In gentile terms, she was sodomized.

]]> By: K-E https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948622 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:17:46 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948622 Hm, I think I have to respectfully disagree with your ‘enthusiasm’ blog post.

As for your comparison of Ron Paul to Trump, Ron Paul had a very, very small percentage of voters interested in him. Trump has 38% in some of the most recent polling.

Comparing presidential election enthusiasm to primary election enthusiasm is not really the same thing. You can dismiss my statement if Trump is the nominee and we see how each candidate fares.

I think Obama’s enthusiasm factor won him the election in 2008. People were pumped to vote for the first black president.

I also think Reagan had an enthusiasm factor that Carter did not.

]]> By: blert https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948581 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:26:43 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948581 Trump’s snark would led many to think she was having rude sex in the bathroom — or troubles with her diaper.

Either way, the imprecation lingers.

It’s an ‘undeniable’ insult — in the sense that it’s impossible to touch the matter without getting more stink into the air.

“When did you stop beating your wife?”

]]> By: FOAF https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948506 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:28:23 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948506 To be Yiddishly correct, she was shtupped.

]]> By: vanderleun https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948450 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 04:15:53 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948450 It’s the slinger, not the schlong.

]]> By: KBK https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948441 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:26:07 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948441 To me, it’s not “screwed”, but “dick whipped”.

]]> By: snopercod https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948435 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 02:28:43 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948435 Cornhead wrote:

Just wondering when was the last time Hillary was schlonged.

Ask Huma, she was there. The only question is who was pitching and who was catching?

]]> By: neo-neocon https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948412 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:13:35 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948412 vanderleun:

If I’m not mistaken, I believe that you just remarked on it.

]]> By: vanderleun https://thenewneo.com/2015/12/22/what-with-this-schlonged-business/#comment-948408 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:58:21 +0000 http://neoneocon.com/?p=55535#comment-948408 On the other hand, nobody ever remarks on the fact that Hillary alone is keeping the C-word alive in the 21st century.

]]>