Whether Trump is a “tool user” or not remains to be seen.

What we do know as a matter of Fact is that
Obummer, Pelosi , Reid, Soros , Jerry Brown, etc have contributed to CA’s decline. I blame these Aholes based on facts rather on my assumptions about Trump.

It is rather easy for tool users at the top of society, like Trump, to take advantage of powerless weaklings that have been broken by the system.

After all, what other choice do they have in California? But the system was setup that way, precisely to obtain that effect.

In a case where WMDs are being used by both sides, one should take a neutral stance, not fall for somebody’s con at the first strike.

And who do you think that “other” reporter might be? You know, the one who was walking back his own “previously fact-checked and verified story on the Muslim celebrants on 911”?

Link; name?

Because my understanding of the clip is that that reporter was Kovaleski. Now, of course I could be wrong, but I’ve never heard of another possibility for who Trump might have been talking about.

It was this story that Kovaleski wrote for the WaPo on September 18, 2001 that’s been the focus of the ruckus.

Here’s part of Kovaleski’s walk-back:

Kovaleski’s story referred to FBI probes of the alleged celebrations, but quoted no witnesses and contained no specific evidence that celebrations occurred.

He was interviewed this week by the Washington Post about his 2001 reporting. “I certainly do not remember anyone saying that thousands or even hundreds of people were celebrating. That was not the case, as best as I can remember,” Kovaleski told CNNMoney.

I have no idea what other reporter and what other story you think Trump was referring to. I’ve done a lot of reading on this, and there has never been any other reporter, story, and walkback mentioned that Trump could have been referring to. Unless you can come up with one, you may have to do a bit of walking back yourself.

In a word, no. Because in reality, same-old same-old media smears are going on
against Trump.

How do i know? First I saw the short clip on CNN that starts and ends with Trump gesticulating like a palsy.

Then, on C-Span’s Wash Journal (morning call in) I see a longer clip: it is clear that Trump was rebuking another LSM conformist for walking back his previously fact-checked and verified story on the Muslim celebrants on 911.

That’s it. And I’m not alone – consider a disabled Vet who witnessed Trump at this event, firsthand:

There is a difference between mocking a reporter for walking back his story who is also disabled and mocking a disabled reporter.

According to a caller to [co-Powerlinblog writer] John Hinderaker, who subbed for Laura Ingaham’s talk radio show on Friday morning, a disabled American Veteran who was at the 10,000 Trump rally, grasped the difference. Why can’t those people – like the NYTimes – who lack obvious disabilities, not do the same?

Does our MSM ever do nuance when covering the Democrats-with-bylines opposition?

Can’t remember when.

I, like Trump, can name people I’ve gotten into fights with, even recall the look on their faces.

You’re not like Trump, psychologically speaking, thus you don’t understand how that part of the core works.

People who have a habit of using anger or strong emotion to get into fights, as Trump and I tend to share, aren’t forgetful of information relating to such. Any more than people forget extremely vivid experiences in war or life.

10 billion dollars can buy the undying loyalty of the superpower called the United States of America?

Humans tend to go through a lot of things to end up at the top.