The information gathered from Gitmo, via capturing terrorists, wasn’t blowing up sand. People like you are so low in the totem pole of human ability that you cannot really be relied upon to judge what’s going on.

As for changing Islamic culture, that’s the job of people like you, sitting behind your computer screens. Cultures don’t change due to some Dear Leader. It changes because millions and billions of people make it change, via war or economic raids.

That wouldn’t be from the internet would it? Because if it’s from vacations, that speaks in its own tone concerning America’s decadence.

BINGO.

BTW, my niece just emailed me today: she’s suddenly snapped out of her liberal birdbrain trance and wants to kill those “motherf*****s” because she knows people in Paris and spent a good bit of time there herself. Also, she’s 27 now; she was too young to be much affected by 9/11, but her message today said she now understands my political change afterwards.

Let’s hope it bears fruit, in her and in many other young ones like her who were brainwashed with the Leftist bulls***. Thank God she’s still capable of righteous anger.

I do not wish to trash Bush, but if we are to mount an effective defense against Islam we must be able to recognize what has gone wrong so far.

I agree that Bush made a strong stand against terrorism -what ever that is – but he was completely ineffective in countering global jihad. Bush expended a great deal of money and effort on blowing up sand and got many of our soldiers killed or wounded, but he do anything to change the Islamic culture which breeds terrorism. By exonerating Islam Bush made it possible for a man named Hussein with a strong Islamic background to be elected president after 911.

For those who love Bush, I agree that he was infinitely better than Obama. Was Bush effective in slowing global jihad? Marginally at best.

If Bush had not gotten rid of Saddam for not following the cease fire agreement, Saddam would have been the strong man who stood up to the West and won. Do you really believe he would not have used that against us, especiall since he already had UN officials, Russians, and corrupt French on his payroll.

Frog,

Merkel has people within her own party who are standing up to her decision. If the CDU goes down, Sigmar Gabriel and the Greens would be more than happy to run the government. Gabriel is a total sleaze who is fascinated by the idea of being chancellor. Real world politics is not an issue for him.

It’s important to remember that it came out in September that US intelligence is being doctored to hide bad news about ISIS because this news “is not welcome.” I have no faith in Obama’s and Jeh Johnson’s assurances that they’ve got the threat to America under control.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/18/doctored-intel-reports-bad-news-isis-wasnt-welcome/#.VfweXggPIrQ.twitter

“neo-neocon Says:
November 14th, 2015 at 8:39 am

Dennis:

I just posted this about Carson’s remarks, as well as Trump’s so far.

I disagree with you about the significance of that remark by Bush, however. His actions were quite strong, and if America and the West had stood behind him and the left had not undermined him (and Obama hadn’t been elected), I believe that things would be better today. …”

Agree