Done.

I’m looking forward to seeing all these traitors burn. Ironically, we won’t have to lift a finger and it’ll be the Left’s own allies doing the punishment. Even lazy moderates sitting on the fence won’t have much to say about that, one way or another.

My solution is premature not IMO unfeasible. At this time, only a small minority of Americans would even give it serious consideration. Once we experience enough pain, once the inherent nature of the threat is no longer deniable, then its time will come.

Making the case for OIF is indeed important but… as far as widespread acceptance is concerned, it is also premature. I agree however that attacking the left’s meme in our lawful actions against Iraq is best mounted now.

Thanks.

I’ve had zero success e-mailing presidential candidates so far, including the President’s brother and the President’s wife, but yeah, it can’t hurt to try another one.

A reasonable question is, we invaded Iraq in 2003 and we left Iraq in 2011 – so much has happened and changed since then – so why is setting the record straight on the decision for OIF urgent, let alone relevant today?

Cornhead’s summary of Fiorina’s remarks points to the relevance:
“Obama always uses the false choice fallacy when describing military options. For him, it is either do nothing or full scale war.”

The “full scale war” taboo is used by the President and likeminded folks to summarily reject sufficient action in the War on Terror. The taboo is derived from the prevalent false narrative of OIF as the image for “full scale war”. It’s a powerful image – the same false narrative of OIF opened the door to the White House in 2008 and the Democrats/Left continue to refresh it as axiom.

Therefore, setting the record straight on OIF at the premise level is key to freeing the American people and politicians, including Republicans, from the taboo in order to restore the American range of action necessary to lead the War on Terror.

That is an urgent and relevant hook for setting the record straight on the decision for OIF today.

Folks like Geoffrey Britain are passionate about prosecuting the War on Terror and frustrated with the current restrictions on American action in the War on Terror. Yet his particular solution call is unfeasible.

I recommend investing his passion in my solution call in order to break the taboo that’s restricting the American range of action in the War on Terror. It wouldn’t satisfy him entirely, but helping to restore the American range of action in the War on Terror would be a tangible contribution to real and urgently needed progress.

President Obama said “ISIL continues to shrink” in an interview just hours before the horrible attack in Paris. He is just so bad! CHANGE.

We need much tougher, much smarter leadership – and we need it NOW!

They laughed at me when I said to bomb the ISIS controlled oil fields. Now they are not laughing and doing what I said.

Trump also caused a furore on the Left and in France with this comment:

BEAUMONT, Texas – Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump says the terror attacks in Paris would have been “a much, much different situation” had the victims been armed with guns.

And he says the United States is “insane” to accept any refugees from Syria in the wake of the attacks.

Any of the GOP candidates would be better than Obama or Hillary in combating islamic terrorism.

Patently untrue in almost all of its assertions. A sop to western ignorance and an excellent example of Taqiyya. It all but claimed that Islam is a “religion of peace”…

If he’d succeeded, the loss of life would have been comparable to yesterday’s attacks.

Thanks again to Spencer Stone, Alek Skarlatos, and Anthony Sadler.

It’s often said by the left, taqiyyah specialists like CAIR and well-meaning but ignorant RINOs, that the jihadists are only a tiny minority of Muslims. So what? If we assume only 2% of them are actively engaged in violent jihad at any given time, that’s still 20 million. That has to be right up there with combined forces of all the non-Muslim countries with the biggest armies.

And they’re conducting guerrilla warfare, hiding under the hijabs of civilians, while our Rules of Engagement make it difficult to even fight back. And we send billions in aid to some of their terrorist organizations like Hamas and the “moderates” in Syria. At least we didn’t subsidize North Viet Nam back in the day when we were fighting them. With enemies like us, who needs friends?

I’ve never read Burnham’s “Suicide of the West” (1964) but I’ll bet it describes our attitudes and actions towards Islam to a “T” if you substitute Islam for Communism.

By the way, here is the link to the home page for the “Minority of Extremists” page, aptly called “The Religion of Peace.” About halfway down, they have a long running list of every Muslim atrocity resulting in deaths in only the last 30 days, with archives that go back to 9/11/2001. It adds up to hundreds of attacks, with many thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of injuries every month, and a similar list could probably be compiled for 20 years prior to our 9/11, which is when we first started to notice these psychopaths.

Muslims are the belligerents in nearly every violent conflict on the planet, and account for almost all the terrorism.