But the headline was the one in the politico, not the copycat clones that came after.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/george-bush-reportedly-ted-cruz-dont-guy/story?id=34604244

blert Says: at 9:22 pm
“Dennis …
More towards India and Bangladesh – both with staggering Muslim populations.”

I agree. I’m fairly confident that sam is from somewhere in that region. If sam is a Muslim from that area there is no way that he can be ignorant of Muslim aggression towards unbelievers and even towards other Muslims because it happens almost every day in his country. Benazir Bhutto was one of the few Muslim leaders I actually admired and she was murdered by jihadists. Sam knows full well that the twin towers were brought down by Muslims because he fully understands the black heart of Islam. Sam is just playing with the kaffirs’ minds by denying what the kaffirs see with their own eyes.

But that’s why people read headlines. It implants an emotion into them and then when they read the details, or what little there is, the details are combined with the emotion to form a very strong belief.

It’s why headline propaganda works the way it has so far, even though in the actual story the opposite may be true. That’s because once emotions are triggered, it doesn’t matter what people read later on.

Looks to me like an attack on the GOP or at least on GOPe.

More towards India and Bangladesh — both with staggering Muslim populations.

His command of English … the odds favor an elitist Muslim well schooled in the Anglo arts.

Oxen would be weird for a ‘South Asian’ male operating from England.

Not a spoof!

Yep. PL 105-338 is featured in the answer to “The reasons for OIF seemed to change. Was it about WMD or democracy?“.

Moreover, Clinton law and policy on Iraq is featured throughout the explanation:

The key to understand President Bush’s decision for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) lies with President Clinton’s enforcement of the Gulf War ceasefire as it peaked in 1998 with Operation Desert Fox (ODF). Clinton’s entire presidency was preoccupied with Saddam Hussein’s noncompliance with the Gulf War ceasefire United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions (UNSCRs), principally UNSCRs 687 and 688. Bush’s case against Saddam was really Clinton’s case against Saddam, updated from 9/11. Likewise, Bush’s enforcement procedure with OIF carried forward Clinton’s enforcement procedure for Iraq, updated from ODF, the penultimate military enforcement step.

I’ve found that bringing up the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, which committed the US to overthrowing Saddam Hussein, passed almost unanimously by Congress (with the votes of Hilary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Al Gore, and Ted Kennedy, among others) and signed by President Bill Clinton, frequently shuts up people like Sam.

Would that someone (Carly, are you listening?) would do that to the Donald!

BTW, Sam, everybody already knows that Paul Bremer is an idiot. No surprise there.

That’s incorrect.

To set the record straight, explanation of the law and policy, fact basis of the decision for Operation Iraqi Freedom.