Comments on: Now, this is odd

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:31:42 +0000

AQ-Taliban killed Massoud in Afghanistan using a shaped charge in a camera, gaining access via an interview.

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:04:53 +0000

blert: I saw Ruby live, too. At YouTube I watched a documentary on the Reagan assassination attempt. It mentioned that those "death-cameras" way predated the Reagan assassination. In fact, why do you think there were so many cameras there that day? For that very reason.

By: blert

blert — Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:25:57 +0000

Neo…

The Press change its M.O., too.

Forever after, a ‘death-camera’ is on the President whenever possible.

They want that ‘Jack Ruby’ video moment.

( I actually saw Ruby do the deed live. What a shocker !)

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:11:13 +0000

Properly set up defense systems aren’t surprised by attacks, because they funnel the attackers into a pre determined setting and time slot, by knowing in advance that this is the best chance for the attacker to setup the odds.

Know your weaknesses and all that. Then use deception and make those weaknesses look weak, but in reality fortify them into your strongholds.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:09:32 +0000

If you’ve ever seen a Presidential motorcade, there’s like 5-15 vehicles that look exactly the same.

From an attacker’s point of view, there’s no way to tell which one, unless you have a GPS bug in the correct vehicle.

So one of the only ways to conduct attacker OPFOR versions of the setup is that the target must be visually identified first, and when are the situations where the target is visually identifiable?

When it is day time, when traveling between cars, and when in an open vehicle.