<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hillary is still way ahead in the Democratic race	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;In reality they want totalitarianism with no dissent.

I do have to give the discipline displayed credit; they couldn’t have accomplished so much without it.&lt;/b&gt;

You should check out the history of Islam for another religion/death cult with a disliking of dissent. They&#039;ll cut your head off for that.

Islam has been taking sex slaves for a lot longer than the Left has, however. Although even the Democrats are older than the Leftist alliance, in purely slave taking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In reality they want totalitarianism with no dissent.</p>
<p>I do have to give the discipline displayed credit; they couldn’t have accomplished so much without it.</b></p>
<p>You should check out the history of Islam for another religion/death cult with a disliking of dissent. They&#8217;ll cut your head off for that.</p>
<p>Islam has been taking sex slaves for a lot longer than the Left has, however. Although even the Democrats are older than the Leftist alliance, in purely slave taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[People might want to check who Valerie Jarret is meeting with. That might be the next Dem contender or setup.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People might want to check who Valerie Jarret is meeting with. That might be the next Dem contender or setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: blert		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ackler Says:
October 13th, 2015 at 12:21 am

Just a corollary to what Physicsguy mentioned; I’ve alluded to this before. A hypothetical: suppose that tomorrow Obama announced he was canceling the 2016 Election by executive order. Either he would stay in power indefinitely or he would voluntarily cede the Presidency to the anointed Hillary (or Biden, etc) on 1/20/2017. Furthermore, he suspends the 114th Congress immediately. For the remainder of his term, laws will come about through executive order. 

&#038;&#038;&#038;&#038;

Don&#039;t even mute it.

Knock it off with the paranoia...

Or are you concern trolling -- testing the reaction of the public ?

Such a post has absolutely no upside -- and would give most the impression that you are floating a trial balloon.

The real world answer is that there would be an uproar, and no small amount of blood letting, usually termed a civil war.

Ask Assad how that plays out.

And, the presidency is not the only office that&#039;s standing for election.

Good grief.

Of course, such a proclamation would put the death mark on everyone that stood with the despot.

You might examine the dire example of &quot;Los Pepes.&quot; 

Or the undoing of many another tyrant. ( c.f. Rome )

The President would lose all Constitutional legitimacy. 

No-one would answer his phone or read his missives.

He&#039;d be lucky if he could even make it out of the country. 

Just ask the Shah of Iran... that fellow barely made it. 

He found out, like Macbeth, how fast the plunge must be when your legitimacy is lost.

Kadaffy ended up depending on imported mercenaries. Every Arab in Libya had abandoned him -- to include his own family !

0bama dares not make such an outlandish proclamation.

Indeed, one might even expect that he would be labeled medically incompetent to serve: tyrannically insane !

That wouldn&#039;t even require an act of Congress.

The next thing he&#039;d know, Biden would be president !

Even Biden could be tossed -- it&#039;s not as if he&#039;s not an alcoholic, just like HRC.

Then the nation would be left with the House of Representatives voting on who would serve out the very short remainder of his term. 

They&#039;d probably vote in a good ol&#039; boy, very much in the mold of Gerald Ford. 

Such an interim president would hold the fort merely until the nation voted in a safe and sane successor.

Tyrant, gone !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ackler Says:<br />
October 13th, 2015 at 12:21 am</p>
<p>Just a corollary to what Physicsguy mentioned; I’ve alluded to this before. A hypothetical: suppose that tomorrow Obama announced he was canceling the 2016 Election by executive order. Either he would stay in power indefinitely or he would voluntarily cede the Presidency to the anointed Hillary (or Biden, etc) on 1/20/2017. Furthermore, he suspends the 114th Congress immediately. For the remainder of his term, laws will come about through executive order. </p>
<p>&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even mute it.</p>
<p>Knock it off with the paranoia&#8230;</p>
<p>Or are you concern trolling &#8212; testing the reaction of the public ?</p>
<p>Such a post has absolutely no upside &#8212; and would give most the impression that you are floating a trial balloon.</p>
<p>The real world answer is that there would be an uproar, and no small amount of blood letting, usually termed a civil war.</p>
<p>Ask Assad how that plays out.</p>
<p>And, the presidency is not the only office that&#8217;s standing for election.</p>
<p>Good grief.</p>
<p>Of course, such a proclamation would put the death mark on everyone that stood with the despot.</p>
<p>You might examine the dire example of &#8220;Los Pepes.&#8221; </p>
<p>Or the undoing of many another tyrant. ( c.f. Rome )</p>
<p>The President would lose all Constitutional legitimacy. </p>
<p>No-one would answer his phone or read his missives.</p>
<p>He&#8217;d be lucky if he could even make it out of the country. </p>
<p>Just ask the Shah of Iran&#8230; that fellow barely made it. </p>
<p>He found out, like Macbeth, how fast the plunge must be when your legitimacy is lost.</p>
<p>Kadaffy ended up depending on imported mercenaries. Every Arab in Libya had abandoned him &#8212; to include his own family !</p>
<p>0bama dares not make such an outlandish proclamation.</p>
<p>Indeed, one might even expect that he would be labeled medically incompetent to serve: tyrannically insane !</p>
<p>That wouldn&#8217;t even require an act of Congress.</p>
<p>The next thing he&#8217;d know, Biden would be president !</p>
<p>Even Biden could be tossed &#8212; it&#8217;s not as if he&#8217;s not an alcoholic, just like HRC.</p>
<p>Then the nation would be left with the House of Representatives voting on who would serve out the very short remainder of his term. </p>
<p>They&#8217;d probably vote in a good ol&#8217; boy, very much in the mold of Gerald Ford. </p>
<p>Such an interim president would hold the fort merely until the nation voted in a safe and sane successor.</p>
<p>Tyrant, gone !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ackler		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ackler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 04:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just a corollary to what Physicsguy mentioned; I&#039;ve alluded to this before. A hypothetical: suppose that tomorrow Obama announced he was canceling the 2016 Election by executive order. Either he would stay in power indefinitely or he would voluntarily cede the Presidency to the anointed Hillary (or Biden, etc) on 1/20/2017. Furthermore, he suspends the 114th Congress immediately. For the remainder of his term, laws will come about through executive order. 

To be clear: Obama has not declared martial law, utilized the military or threatened anyone who dissents. Nope. He just announced the above is happening and that&#039;s that.

Yes, there would be an uproar. Immediate calls for impeachment throughout the right of the spectrum. My question is: what of liberals? I&#039;m not thinking of the fire breathing Alinskyite academics/journalists/activist - organizer types (who would cheer him on gleefully). I&#039;m thinking of our ordinary &quot;good German&quot; liberal  (&quot;moderate&quot;, ever so moderate!) neighbors and colleagues. How many would raise a fuss, would be shocked, scared and outraged? How many would simply shrug secure in the knowledge that the ends justify the means? 

This question has occupied my mind multiple times. The conclusion I typically come to is almost too painful to acknowledge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a corollary to what Physicsguy mentioned; I&#8217;ve alluded to this before. A hypothetical: suppose that tomorrow Obama announced he was canceling the 2016 Election by executive order. Either he would stay in power indefinitely or he would voluntarily cede the Presidency to the anointed Hillary (or Biden, etc) on 1/20/2017. Furthermore, he suspends the 114th Congress immediately. For the remainder of his term, laws will come about through executive order. </p>
<p>To be clear: Obama has not declared martial law, utilized the military or threatened anyone who dissents. Nope. He just announced the above is happening and that&#8217;s that.</p>
<p>Yes, there would be an uproar. Immediate calls for impeachment throughout the right of the spectrum. My question is: what of liberals? I&#8217;m not thinking of the fire breathing Alinskyite academics/journalists/activist &#8211; organizer types (who would cheer him on gleefully). I&#8217;m thinking of our ordinary &#8220;good German&#8221; liberal  (&#8220;moderate&#8221;, ever so moderate!) neighbors and colleagues. How many would raise a fuss, would be shocked, scared and outraged? How many would simply shrug secure in the knowledge that the ends justify the means? </p>
<p>This question has occupied my mind multiple times. The conclusion I typically come to is almost too painful to acknowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CV		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know some male Democrats who absolutely despise her, and I think there are probably many more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know some male Democrats who absolutely despise her, and I think there are probably many more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PapayaSF		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PapayaSF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Matt_SE: I think you are correct. And not only is she unpopular with (or at least uninspiring to) many Democrats, she is much less attractive to nearly everyone (independents, leftists, and some Republicans and libertarians) than Obama was in 2008. That makes 2016 a huge opportunity for Republicans, though of course they can always blow it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt_SE: I think you are correct. And not only is she unpopular with (or at least uninspiring to) many Democrats, she is much less attractive to nearly everyone (independents, leftists, and some Republicans and libertarians) than Obama was in 2008. That makes 2016 a huge opportunity for Republicans, though of course they can always blow it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sdferr		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929044</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sdferr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two Democrat operatives overheard on the subject of electing Hillary Clinton --

von F.: What a filthy job!

I: Could be worse.

von F.: How?

I: Could be raining.

[thunder]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Democrat operatives overheard on the subject of electing Hillary Clinton &#8212;</p>
<p>von F.: What a filthy job!</p>
<p>I: Could be worse.</p>
<p>von F.: How?</p>
<p>I: Could be raining.</p>
<p>[thunder]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt_SE		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929040</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt_SE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t pretend to be an expert on Democrat thinking, but my gut tells me that Hillary is wildly unpopular with a huge portion of the party. If she wins the nomination, millions of Democrats will sit out the election.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t pretend to be an expert on Democrat thinking, but my gut tells me that Hillary is wildly unpopular with a huge portion of the party. If she wins the nomination, millions of Democrats will sit out the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: parker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[97% agree. The hockey stick never dies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>97% agree. The hockey stick never dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: M J R		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/10/12/hillary-is-still-way-ahead-in-the-democratic-race/#comment-929030</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M J R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=53410#comment-929030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eric, 5:27 pm -- &quot;President Bush’s case against Saddam [Hussein; when did we-all agree to be on a first-name basis?] was inherited from President Clinton’s case against Saddam [Hussein], and Bush’s enforcement procedure with Operation Iraqi Freedom carried forward Clinton’s enforcement procedure with Operation Desert Fox.

But as we all &quot;know&quot;, Clinton was good, whereas Bush was eeeeeeevil.  Period.  Settled science.  End of controversy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, 5:27 pm &#8212; &#8220;President Bush’s case against Saddam [Hussein; when did we-all agree to be on a first-name basis?] was inherited from President Clinton’s case against Saddam [Hussein], and Bush’s enforcement procedure with Operation Iraqi Freedom carried forward Clinton’s enforcement procedure with Operation Desert Fox.</p>
<p>But as we all &#8220;know&#8221;, Clinton was good, whereas Bush was eeeeeeevil.  Period.  Settled science.  End of controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
