You probably should out some of the new sub cultural movements, they will probably appeal to you more than the authoritative mainstream of conservative culture or politics.

http://www.voxday.blogspot.com/2015/09/how-not-to-do-it.html

The Cimmerian Blog has been defunct for half a decade, but now that one of our former bloggers has been exposed as an SJW, we feel impelled to rise from our slumber to declare that we stand 100% against SJWs and their travelling freakshow of interlocking fetishes and predatory abuses.

We publicly express our support, unequivocally and without reservation, for Sword-and-Sorcery expert Morgan Holmes, as well as for fantasy author Vox Day. Both are great and good friends of REH fandom, and of liberty.-is another example from a different post there

The word “fan” is important there, because it’s a variation on fanatic. Human beings don’t become calmer without a religious authority like the Pope over them. They just find other stuff to believe in. And some of that stuff is somewhat allergic to Leftists.

That’s because you and your generation, and even some of the later gens, don’t have a lot of fanatics on your side.

The newer generations brought up on the internet, sub cultures of the mainstream culture, are different. There are plenty of fanatics and rebels out there, but they are also conservative in the sense that they are like a killer bee nest. Don’t threaten them and they’re okay. However, as a force on the internet, the Left has tried to take over their economy and their interests, and instead of the quick victory in which the Left had over the civil rights and subversion of feminism, the internet sub cultures pushed back successfully.

What makes the newer generations different from the older ones? They brought up in a different sub culture, one that focused on Arakis like fanaticism over the reason and calm of normal old gen conservatives.

Of course statistically, it is difficult to pin point their generation, because they share the generation with the newer Leftist zombies out of universities.

It is the height of irony that the only successful counter offensive ever launched against the Left’s poisonous evil invasion and subversion forces have come from internet gamers, the least likely community to be thought to have the back bone to punch back twice as hard against totalitarians. They can’t win the war on their own, of course, merely solidify their defense and logistics against Leftist invasion. They have almost zero defense against SWAT teams, although they are far less vulnerable to the IRS and Fema.

The defense line against the death squads will come from a different sub cultural front entirely, once time gets right.

It is way too soon to be talking about a counter offensive campaign. Right now American patriots are on lock down, pure defensive turtle mode. If they try to mobilize together, the IRS will pop a nuke and a drone bomb on those formations.

Besides, keeping the Left from taking over any more institutions is just as valuable as trying to use up resources in a counter offensive, as a last ditch offensive even. Logistically, people should be shoring up their defenses against the Left. Instead of infiltrating the Left, make sure any SJWs or Leftists in your economic or social circle are purged. If you have the manpower to take back any orgs which the Left occupies, go for it, but if you don’t, get out of the organization and form a new one, one that the Left can’t infiltrate as easily.

Without this re alignment of strategic assets, top down orgs like the IRS can always nuke any significant threat on the enemy front.

https://www.conservativereview.com/Commentary/2015/09/7-reasons-voters-are-questioning-fiorinas-outsider-status

@ AVI: True, many are busy in those things you’ve listed. What I don’t see why there isn’t a hard push to fight for elbow room in the cultural institutions I’ve noted. Even the military is bowing down to “equality” and “inclusion” and losing its identity. Not all conservatives have the mentality to run a business and ironically, businesses that become corporations tend to support whatever social issue becomes the flavor of the months (LGBT). So even the land of suits and “bottom-line” are in bed with the social tide.

>>When things are going badly wrong in the country, we will each do our bit,

Too little, too late. If there’s one thing I admire about The Left is their feverish will to “win.” They got a plan and they execute it. Even if they achieve just 80% of their goal, it’s far more than what conservatives have done. Conservatives don’t have that, and if any there’s not enough to go around.

I just see it as immensely pathetic how The Left dominates cultural institutions. It truly is pathetic. If leftism the tide and conservatism is cliff getting pummeled by the tide, causing slow erosion, there’s talk how to fix the erosion but no agency. I don’t households with conservative values encouraging their kids to enter academia if they show an aptitude for such a thing; I don’t see conservative families encouraging their kids t become playwrights or writers in fiction if they show talent in expressing their thoughts on paper. I don’t see conservative families encourage their kids to work in the media, even with all the technology that surrounds their kids. I don’t see any of that. It’s the weird obsession with STEM and business (and business is growing more left every day).

When it comes to education, there seems to be a fundamental difference in philosophy: conservatives see college as job training (STEM) while the left sees it as a cultural pathway to further push whatever agenda. You don’t gain cultural influence through STEM – STEM is behind the scenes. For all the talk about gaining back the culture, conservatives need a new strategy because their aim is aiming at the wrong target. As I said, you fail to engage in academia, arts & entertainment and journalism and you lost half the battle.

“Politics is downstream from culture.” – Andrew Breitbart

You gain a firm footing in culture, you can effectively change the culture – while not being the laughing stock.

If we limited the franchise to married people who have raised two children to the age of eight, the Democratic Party would shrink to unimportant size. Those of you here who don’t fit that description fully would likely sign off on it once you saw the results.

Never gonna happen, of course. But it illustrates my point.

Conservatism dearly needs people who have sophistication – I wouldn’t say the educational pedigree that many on the left have – but it needs to evolve into an urbane image, both inside and out. We sorta have that in some of the current GOP candidates, but The Right needs more and such people need to take over the current GOP party, and for good.

Too long have conservatives wanted to be “left alone” and with this attitude have failed to engage in the world, when need be. And when they do it’s often times awkward and embarrassing. Take a lesson out of the left: infiltrate society’s institutions with the pedigree and slowly gain authority, but given how the American conservatism works it’ll twice as long as the left slogged away when they gained entrance.

I had not seen that exchange with Tingles and it was good.

I am afraid most people who are paying attention and who can make a difference will hear Fiorina saying she empathizes with a liar and a corrupt leftist.

That may not be a fair or even logical interpretation, but (I guess) it will be by far the most widespread interpretation, predictably so.

When it comes to liars, cheaters, corrupt plutocrats, aggressive slanderers and harassers, destroyers of innocent lives, it is hard to imagine anything they can do otherwise which elicits empathy, or at least expressions of empathy. They can go to Hell.

Having so far been very impressed by Fiorina (and very hopeful) I hope I am over-reacting now.

I couldn’t disagree with you more.

Let’s assume Fiorina did say she feels empathy for Hillary. I actually think that’s brilliant. It puts her in what the family therapy biz would call a “one-down” position, cleverly and subtly. While seeming to say something “nice,” she’s actually saying “poor dear, I can really understand her struggles—poor dear.”

This is the sort of thing that really appeals to women. If that sounds sexist of me, so be it.

At the same time, Fiorina has been absolutely relentless in her critcism of Hillary since the very beginning of Fiorina’s campaign. Maybe you’re not all that familiar with Fiorina’s shtick, but here’s a small part of it (start around 0:40).

The only cure for that is mountains of dead Americans, or maybe a second Great Depression.