If your September 22nd, 2015 at 12:08 pm post is true that’s yuge news; Are you Charles Nielsen? If so, why haven’t you gone to CBS ABC NBC PBS CNN WAPO NYT LAT with your story? Actually, why didn’t you go to them months ago? Come to think of it, why haven’t you mentioned it before here?
If you’re not Charles Nielsen, then why no quotation marks or attribution? It reads like you’ve finally disclosed your true identity here at neo-neocon.com. Please clarify and elucidate!

Our adventures in Iraq, in my estimation, were an utter failure, and had become so under GWB. The propensity of American military might seems all of, and nothing more, than ‘shock and awe’. If you disagree, fine, by all means do so, but refrain from blaming me for merely noticing that failure.

My standard of success is what exactly? Under the circumstances it would be to not engage in what you cannot manage. It would be not to sacrifice an American soldier’s life and limb for nothing more than leaving him to the untender mercies of the VA — so corrupt that a “Wounded Warrior Project” had become necessary to tend to them. It would be not to involve ourselves in killing ‘rag heads’ while importing them into the country.

“Surgically spliced apart”
I see now how you had become so muddled. Things are spliced together… not apart. Now that you know, perhaps you’ll make a better showing in your fulminations.

”…cuckservatives and ankle biters like you, Pal, to praise the enemies of Western civilization.

One instance, just one, of my praising the enemies of Western Civilization. Left or Islam. Take my observation that on the whole the two have been smarter than Western leaders, and you have not praise but lamentation. I take it you would not challenge the daily-made-manifest assertion.

“As if someone like you, Pal, would ever gain the power to stomp on Mr. President Trump once he obtains the power”

Not only are you muddled about ‘splicing’ you seem unaware of ‘metaphor’.

“I wonder why you think you’re superior to Bush II and Fio”

Again, why should an expression of disapproval presume superiority? It’s no easy task to determine what ails you from a distance, but I believe you read too much between the lines and far, far too much into the spaces between the words. Stop it! You are not good at it.

I had once an occasion to disagree with Edmund Burke when I’d read the following:
“…the Mahomedan law, which is binding upon all, from the crowned head to the meanest subject; a law interwoven with a system of the wisest, the most learned, and most enlightened jurisprudence that perhaps ever existed in the world.”
– Edmund Burke, “Speech in the Impeachment of Warrent Hastings, Esq.”

I believed him to be wrong, monstrously wrong in this instance, but I hadn’t thought myself superior to him. My superiority is no more than a figment of your deep inferiority complex.

I’ll not provide any more tutorials. If you’re having problems with reading comprehension, I suggest you seek out your local learning annex. If, by chance you happen to be ‘differently abled’ then, never mind.

Superior only to Ymarsakar,

George Pal

You must be under the delusion that Bush II is still President or that Fio has been President of the US then.

Your attitude is very different for people you despise vs people you would give power to. But that much is to be expected.

As if someone like you, Pal, would ever gain the power to stomp on Mr. President Trump once he obtains the power of said office, even in a diminished American Regime. I wonder why you think you’re superior to Bush II and Fio, making promises you must know you cannot fulfill.

Why would I, an enemy of Islam, praise Muslims for getting each other? They merely consolidate their power and rape capitals, allowing them to move together as one in a prepared invasion.

It is not my place to praise the killing power of enemies, only to recognize it and counter it.

No, it is the place of cuckservatives and ankle biters like you, Pal, to praise the enemies of Western civilization. Since, after all, they are one of the mightiest thorns in the side of people you are prejudiced against, whether this Republican or the last Republican matters not.

Who should kill an enemy, is the enemy of that enemy. It is not for others to steal the joy of the hunt. And certainly not someone like you, Pal, Mister Opinion Projector.

How is that different from American efforts in Vietnam?

As I told Neo Neocon, if the next President reverses and sabotages the previous President’s plan, there’s no way people can support and ally with America. That’s why they don’t, except by giving false fealty and lukewarm superficial support. They, and the Iraqis knew this as well as others, knew that Americans were weak and had little value on loyalty.

A nation’s foreign policy doesn’t work merely due to the efforts of one person. Nor did FDR save the country. The country saved the country. A nation is where everyone pulls together for the common cause, and the fact that America has been divided along ideological faults since 1840 is why Civil War II is in the near future: the fate of a nation.

No one person could have changed it, any more than one Roman Emperor could save Rome in 530 AD.

The world doesn’t fear, respect, or blame America for the foreign policy. The world fears America because her power is tied to insane interests. They blame America because that is the natural emotion of the oppressed towards cruel or unstable masters.

The Left has had something to do with that too. America never had the power to change the fate of other nations. It required more than one person, more than one nation, and more than some faction in a nation, to generate self change. Ultimately, America couldn’t even change the fate of her own people, thus the nation does not have the power to change the fate of other nations. Not any more at least.

is meant to demonstrate a rant

As for Pal, that’s just one of your milder posts I ended up finding. It doesn’t include the ones about Iraq which you went on and on, although over an extended period.

Is killing ‘rag heads’ your measure of success? If it is, then by Allah, say something nice about all the Muslims who’d killed more ‘rag heads’ than GWB.

It’s one standard of success, but not the only one. The fact that you have nothing to say to that means your standard of success is what exactly; being a Master of Opinion here that is supposed to help fight the Left vs all the other cuckservatives white knighting people that you think you’re standing over as a superior specimen, eh.

What a pathetic piece of drivel your opinions come out as when surgically spliced apart. You can’t even provide any substantial defense to your own ranting about Bush and Iraq, which you felt so strongly over years ago. Is that the extent of your emotional based logic? Rather weak sauce from this pov.

We need a Scottish bagpipe.

Standards and boundaries ladies! Standards and boundaries ….

Yup!

Well stated expat. I love the image of a bunch of academic pinheads sitting in Cafe Einstein luxuriating in their Anti-Americanism! The symbolism of European academics sitting in a German cafe pontificating about their moral superiority is especially rich since Einstein was a Jew. Seriously, why should anyone, with the exception of people like you who have to deal with them face to face, care about what they think.

BTW, the screenwriter might been inspired by Wodehouse where Bertie tells a joke the wrong way as he repeats it.