Comments on: Hillary’s email server…

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Fri, 21 Aug 2015 19:05:14 +0000

HRC is like the stalking horse, for another goon bug to appear as the Left’s new God Emperor.

By: Francesca

Francesca — Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:10:40 +0000

I am in the Denver area, and the way I understand it is as follows: When the company, Platte River Network, was just starting out, it was headquartered in a loft apartment, and ITS servers (NOT HILLARY’S SERVERS) were indeed in a bathroom closet. As the company grew, they moved into a non-apartment building where the servers were not in the bathroom.
Apparantly, the company did some work for Hickenlooper during his campaigns, too. Please correct me if this is incorrect.

By: JuliB

JuliB — Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:08:29 +0000

I can only hope this turns off enough Dems that some sit home.

By: Richard Saunders

Richard Saunders — Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:04:34 +0000

Of course the server deal went to a friend — that’s the Democratic Party way and always has been. From fixing a pothole to awarding a road repair contract to Barry’s awarding the $600,000,000 Obamacare contract to a college buddy of Michelle’s. Always has been, always will be.

My hope is that enough techie pajama boys (and girls) — who know perfectly well the implication of this story — will be disgusted enough that they’ll just stay home on Election Day 2016.

By: charles

charles — Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:56:36 +0000

I’m beginning to think that this email scandal is going to hurt her; and maybe even keep her from getting the Democrat’s nomination.

In addition to this story not going away, there is also her reaction.

They had a clip on the nightly news the other night that showed her answering a reporters question about the emails. (sorry, I couldn’t find the clip on YouTube) In her response she wasn’t just very defensive about it; but, she also answered with such cautious language – something along the lines of “well, we turned over everything that we thought was relevant” or something to that effect.

That “we thought was relevant” is something that a kid might say – knowing full well that the rest of the statement is a lie. Not only is she a liar; but, she isn’t very good at it either.

By: blert

blert — Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:12:29 +0000

I’m with Parker:: death of a thousand bytes… heck even giga-bytes.

As for back-up — the NSA/ GCHQ // Moscow and Beijing ALL have back-ups.

Further, EVERYONE who she sent emails to is a very likely source of the emails. That’s the kind of meta-data that her internet provider would have on yet OTHER hard drives// thumb drives.

E-mail addresses are ALWAYS duped into a second data structure.

So Congress can grab that meta-data and pursue the other end of her email convos.

Congress can also go to the NSA and compel that agency to cough up her emails. As a HIGHLY placed player in the US government, the NSA would’ve automatically been trolling all traffic through the internet nodes used by HRC.

And she was so VERY busy.

Just right there, the NSA would be attracted. Such ultra high volume accounts are extremely rare… Only a handful of bloggers could match her Web traffic.

By: Cornflour

Cornflour — Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:46:36 +0000

Even just observing political candidates is starting to feel like a game of chicken, but I’ll stick my neck out and side with Parker on this issue. I think Obama really hates Hillary, and really wants to see a socialist in the White House. A truly wonderful legacy. Transformation.

As soon as it’s clear that Sanders has a good chance of winning, Obama will tell Hillary that she’s going to prison if she doesn’t withdraw and support Bernie.

I too will say “my story and I’m sticking to it.”

By: carl in atlanta

carl in atlanta — Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:23:36 +0000

LisaM : What you describe sounds like the "Barnyard Syndrome" to me. Ask any poultry farmer: There's an injured or sick chicken out in the barnyard, limping around. After a while, another chicken will come along a peck her, HARD. Then another comes along and does the same. And another, and another, etc. Before long, all the chickens in the flock will descend on the wounded/sick hen and she will go down in a cloud of feathers. Hillary's been wounded by this and the first few chickens from her own barnyard have come by to peck her: Scarborough and Brzezinski/MSNBC: PECK. Chris Cillizza and the WAPO: PECK Mary Dejevsky and the freaking Guardian:: PECK And worst of all (so far), the NYT:: PECK! There are other examples to be found of the pecking chickens in HRC's barnyard; I've only named a few. May they keep on peckin' ....

By: parker

parker — Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:52:41 +0000

I continue to think hrc will not be the nominee. The 2016 ticket will be Warren and perhaps O’Malley. Bho has no desire to see the clintons in the Whitehouse so his doj will make her suffer a thousand cuts as more email revelations are ‘discovered’. Some time in the next 6 months hrc will withdraw from the race due to ill health.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:01:57 +0000

LisaM: I wrote about those issues in this post. My liberal friends mostly don't care, although a few have turned on her. Most of them still support her. If she is the nominee, they would probably all vote for her. But they'd all be just as happy, and some happier, with Sanders or virtually any other Democrat. The real questions are (a) whether it will hurt her so much that she'll lose the nomination (b) who her replacement would be if she does (c) whether any of it would turn off enough people who would ordinarily have voted for her, and motivate them to stay home, or to vote for the Republican.