18+ girls are highly desirable to the porn cartels and businessmen.

Porn is its own sub culture, very hidden since they don’t like outsiders to realize what they are doing. Their methods and practices generate a high profit margin, at the expense of the human mind and spirit. Those damaged goods, naturally need something to fight against.

My theory can easily be tested if you crack the financial records of those girls and see what’s going on. But will people do something like that? People might find something more interesting there than what IRS and Clintons had in their mails.

The lawyers win irregardless of what the results are. They provide immunity to each other, one way or another.

It’s like a house game, it’s rigged.

Chastity vs Luxuria

Temperance vs Gula

Patience vs Ira

The 10 Commandments were removed, along with the Confed flag of Lee and others. But before those removals, which are merely the tip of the spear, the Left also moved the seven deadly sins and the seven heavenly virtues.

Want to take a guess as to why?

Here’s a primer on those virtues and vices then.

A chaste person would not indulge in sexual relations except under healthy or worthy limits. Luxuria or those guilty of lust, would fall into darkness, being driven by their sexual desires, losing their status as humans or rational beings.

Chastity thus: Embracing of moral wholesomeness and achieving purity of thought-through education and betterment. The ability to refrain from being distracted and influenced by hostility, temptation or corruption

Education, is it. How educated are these college fools, one either side? Can they resist the distraction and influence of hostility? Are they tempted or are they corrupt? Are they tempted to corruption even? Would a chaste person fall into darkness at these colleges? If the Left is the ultimate evil, would they tolerate chastity as a virtue? Would they tolerate lust instead? Why, is it because lust makes people easier to control and indoctrinate?

Now then, what is said of temperance: Restraint, temperance, justice. Constant mindfulness of others and one’s surroundings; practicing self-control, abstention, moderation and deferred gratification. Prudence to judge between actions with regard to appropriate actions at a given time. Proper moderation between self-interest, versus public-interest, and against the rights and needs of others.

Are college students mindful of self control, do they defer gratification? Are American youths capable of balancing the interest of society with their own rights and needs?

Or are they fallen to Ira, Wrath?
Wrath:Anger or wrath is an intense emotional response. Often it indicates when one’s basic boundaries are violated. Some have a learned tendency to react to anger through retaliation.

Seneca addresses the question of mastering anger in three parts: 1. how to avoid becoming angry in the first place 2. how to cease being angry and 3. how to deal with anger in others.[12] Seneca suggests, to avoid becoming angry in the first place, that the many faults of anger should be repeatedly remembered. One should avoid being too busy or deal with anger-provoking people. Unnecessary hunger or thirst should be avoided and soothing music be listened to.[12] To cease being angry, Seneca suggests “one to check speech and impulses and be aware of particular sources of personal irritation. In dealing with other people, one should not be too inquisitive: It is not always soothing to hear and see everything. When someone appears to slight you, you should be at first reluctant to believe this, and should wait to hear the full story. You should also put yourself in the place of the other person, trying to understand his motives and any extenuating factors, such as age or illness.”

Now then, are American youths and college students capable of moderating their anger, while repeating the mistakes of anger? Are they capable of forgiving slights or at least waiting, deferring the benefits of wrath, until later, when guilt is more certain and sure? Are they waiting to hear the “full story”?

The Left often uses pride to declare themselves superior and thus our rulers, because their intelligence is supposedly much higher than our own. But is that true? Do they have the virtues to support this claim, that they can exercise reason without interference from temptation, wrath, and desires?

for a lot of fun:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Still Can’t Come Up With a Difference Between Democrats and Socialists

http://content.jwplatform.com/previews/4vGRpMRy-hLb0vkFd

she REFUSES to answer the question and keeps changing it to a question of differences between dems and republicans and how the “socialsits” want to save your retirement and how the republans are mean and wnt to end medicare/medicaid…(or some such drivel)

you see… if the publica actually found out that they have been voting for socialism, given their stupidity in refusing to understand synonyms when doing so allows one to pretend a difference without a distinction.

communism, socialism, bolshiviks, menshiviks, nazis, fabians, progressives, (modern) liberals, leftists, (practical) anarchists, feminists, fascists, and many more are ALL variations on the same thing…

totalitarians…
and only americans are stupid enough to think that a puppy is not a dog, and an acorn is not an oak tree… and caterpillers dont become moths/butterflies…

ie. its a special kind of stupid