Nobody asked their vote on whether they should go to war with the North. Part of the Union agreement was that the feds would enforce anti fugitive and slave laws for the Southern states, by pressuring the Northern states. What State’s Rights was that again? By breaking the Union pact by saying the feds didn’t have enough power to make their promise go through, also broke the non aggression pact which prevented wars. But the Southern Dems thought the North were a bunch of pansies, too weak to fight a single battle against the Southern boys.

Kind of like how Democrats see American patriots.

White English-speaking Americans are going to be a despised minority in the future. It will be open season on us. Beatings, robbery, rape, murder; you name it. Don’t dare fight back, because that’s “racist”.

The Federal government is now wholly criminal and illegitimate, with all that that implies.

The crackpots and paranoid freaks seem to think Hussein hasn’t killed anyone nor executed them. They can continue to think so as things change around them. Perhaps when the American population is reduced to a tenth, they will become the majority opinion once more.

As for Democrat votes, slaves generated political leverage and votes for the owners. The slaves themselves didn’t get a say in how their votes were to be used. The owners and Democrat politicians were the masters.

People are misguided if they think Demons merely hope that immigrants will vote for them. Slaves don’t get to choose who they vote for, that’s not the point.

Today’s Democrats who wish to throw open the borders to get more votes–in the short run–, must think that once the majority in their locales speak a foreign language, they will continue to vote for people who speak English.

Doesn’t happen in SoCal, I can assure you. Officials with European surnames (except Spanish) have a lot in common with hen’s teeth.

During the early stages of an economic implosion, the central government ALWAYS papers over the travail.

( Or, in ancient societies, dilutes the specie.)

I have some old friends who are working on their citizenship as we speak. They are educate people from a South American country that has gone down a bad road recently. They get that these liberal policies do not work and don’t want to see such crap in America. There are more people like this than you think.

Vitter is still in the Senate, and he has recently tried to reintroduce the bill. Here’s more.

I can’t get too much on what happened, but my guess is that the bill either dies in committee or languishes there. But I also think it’s interesting that we’ve heard so little about it.

There are people like Vitter who’ve been working on this. You wrote:

If a GOP candidate called for such a law, that person would immediately stand out from the crowd. The key point is that someone is calling for real action completely contrary to the desires of the Rulling Class. Add in the call for a moriatoreum on all immigration, and that candidate is a star.

Well, Vitter isn’t a candidate, he’s already a senator. But note how little we’ve heard of this, and how he’s not “a star.”

Actually, I may do some more research on this and write a post about it, because I think it’s very interesting and quite important in terms of what happens to ideas like this.

I didn’t recall your post (or my comment) from last year.

If a GOP candidate called for such a law, that person would immediately stand out from the crowd. The key point is that someone is calling for real action completely contrary to the desires of the Rulling Class. Add in the call for a moriatoreum on all immigration, and that candidate is a star.

The Dems, of course, would play the race card all day because it threatens their hegemony for the next 50 years. But that’s the whole point: Defeating Hillary and the Dems.

We need a politician who is for Americans; not the Ruling Class.