Concept

http://www.westernjournalism.com/how-obama-literally-hypnotized-america-part-1/

The key methodology is NLP, essentially mind control.

As for how I know, it’s not merely abstract knowledge to me. Like most things, I test out the veracity of people’s so called educated claims. That requires me to be capable of doing various things in various fields, but only incompetents fail to do the basics. It is well within the realm of feasibility for hard work, talent, and jack of all trades.

His techniques don’t work on you because

1. You haven’t met him, so the bandwidth required to condition a person isn’t available.
2. You may not be susceptible to hypnotic techniques to begin, meaning you already have an Authority controlling your heart or maybe you’re just pig stubborn and refuse to listen to anyone.

But to spell it out: I can see something similar to what happened in Germany in 1930s happening in the U.S. In fact, I don’t think it’s all that implausible. I won’t, however, say it’s already happening, nor precisely what form it will take, although I think we can all guess. But we are heading in that direction.

Neo already went over that. What were you doing, not paying attention?

When America stopped passing down freedom to the next generation, as happened in Vietnam and Iraq and Afghanistan, did people really think the divine power that protected America in the past, would continue to hold?]

People are mighty fickle and weak and spoiled, if they think the prosperity and security they have is merely because of national and patriotic powers.

the problem with all this is that no one listens to warnings… period, exclamation point… cassandra syndrome is the norm

which is why you see the left and its academics going nuts coming up with warning after warning after warning, diluting the idea because they are abusing warnings. but also, it doesnt matter the rational parallels to things… no one will listen. they did not listen as to the long telegram, they did not listen as to the expansion of hitler/stalin, they did not listen as to the water in lousiana (Despite scientific american doing a huge spread on it a few years before the incidents).

they cant even comprhend that we live in an empirical world that operates by reproducible principals… ie. do the same thing, your going to get the same outcome…

somehow, they think – when i do it, its different
or when we do the same thing, its somehow different than when the other evil x did it
(this is made more trajedic comic by the fact that the leaders ARE doing the same thing with the idea of the same or similar outcome they think they can control, limit, or benefit from)

the other part of this which i suspect is NOT in his book, would be the idea of how perception works. things too slow, or too fast are outside of our perceptual band…. (just as there is a formula in which a difference has to be exceeded or you cant tell the difference)

so if you do things slow enough, people wont notice it… percieve it, or be able to make the calculation of what your doing…

if you move too fast, they wont comprehend and will stand there waiting for a pause for their turn to act…

if you think of the left and the hitler thing, think hitler was blitzkreig, too fast to take it in, think, act etc… at least till your in it too and operating at the same speed.

now take the same thing and slow it down so that its not too fast to be percieved, but too slow to be percieved… now, the issue is pushing to the point of reaction, then stepping back… in this way, you get to act, and the victim sets the limits of their perception

of course, people in the population are not all on the same page so there will always be people who are perceptive and if you move slow enough to trick them, your so slow you wont benefit in your lifetime or several… so you have to be slower than most, but faster than a few, and the few you marginalze by making fun of their perception of things that would warn others!

i could have told you where we were going as far back as high school… in the late 70s and early 80s… why? because of being a refugee family of immigrants which are not the same as other immigrants (though i would say illegals are close, but different)

illegals eventually want to go back, so they are more like people traveling to make a fortune then return home, and can… ahd home is there.

regular immigrants say goodbye, and while they may visit, they are not much interested in going back, they want to be part of their new home and do assimilate for the most part, holding on to the best parts of their old culture, like holidays, or foods, etc.

refugees? they want to go back home, they are akin to a person being kicked out of their house they love. they didnt want to leave, they would have stayed. and they also put this on their kids as well, the “dream that was” like when i said to read freda utley.

they raise their kids they tell them the best of the old things, they tell them what it was there, and they instill in them this desire to go back… but sadly, unilike the other two, there is no place to go back to. it no longer exists, as the conditions that forced them out, destroy what they loved and what they loved is gone. so they pine for a place that isnt anymore, they dream of returning to.

it was this attitude that many many people came here from the war with. which is why the refugee immigrants are the more sensitive to whats going on and what it will lead to… the other two dont have that radar… and the resident population who are victims of this thing, they dont have it either as they never experienced it. put a penguin in a room with a poisonous snake and the end is preordained given the penguins lack of knowing to stay away.

when the left fihts this, they are not actually making a rational argument as to yse or no. they are fighting to preserve their belief and faith and are denying that it can be any other way… the former is safe warm predictable and expected and they wrap themselves in it… they are very hard to budge because they have to accept they are wrong first, then accept that their is no warm blanket and so on. which is why people dont actually switch sides, they only wake up and realize that they are sitting with people that never actually represented their ideas or ideals – and then through learning realize who did, and so they join. (the left wont do that until things are so plain to see, but that is the counter revolution the leaders are prepared to stop as they know what their victims behavior will be)

i will see if i can get a copy of the book… it should be interesting… but it probably will be a lot i already know and i may even know more.

i see books like that, kind of like stories from afar that try to break through the wall of ingorance and faith belief… they preach to the choir, and hope that the pews read too, but seldom do.

however, they often fall short given that if they unload the full monty, only a few readers will bother, as the idea of belief and faith is not a digital yes or no, but a spectrum, and too much truth causes incredulity.

to paraphrase carol king, our lives are but a tapestry of rich embroiled hue, and ever changing…

most of the reasoning of people on things can be shown to be quite faulty… for instance “russia would not do that, theyw ould hurt their own people”… to which “what makes you think that a society willing to exterminate 100 million of their own in slave labor cares a whit about what will happen to that slave labor – and why would that restrict them at all?

to draw an analogy, they wont do that as they will get their disposable paper towel wet… its only because the speaker values X that they blieve X to be valuable and put it in their equation – they do not think as the other, they think as themselves in the others shoes, which is not the same thing by a wide margin.

thanks for the reference..
hopefully i can find a copy..

but i wonder, have YOU yet read the freda utley books? and Ruta U “dear god i wanted to live” which would make anne franks diary one of many not just one…

one is a curiousity / two is amazing / three or more is commonplace.

you can download freda’s books… they are free. as is the history of the hayes tilden election… which is a BIG eye opener as to the UNCHANGING behavior of the democrats!!!! it is not they who have changed over the years, its those who watched and know that died out and were replaced by babes.

🙂

The Ominous Parallels Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYyikDBGbT8

and i just looked and now have a copy

though i would also recommend reading the golitsyn books, and the mitrokhen books…

I wonder whether you’re familiar with Leonard Peikoff’s book The Ominous Parallels? Peikoff was/is Ayn Rand’s successor, and the book is an interesting one. It came out in 1983.

way before i came here i was part of la russophobe, which was discussing all of this almost a decade in advance of it, but then things got too hot. some were worried that we would be targeted, people showed up on my driveway telling me what not to do… and the discussions went behind a closed wall, which i did not want to be behind..

but i think this one is most interesting
and i will bet that neo forgot it
go back to 2009

Obama defends Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy
http://neoneocon.com/2009/06/04/obama-defends-irans-right-to-peaceful-nuclear-energy/

anyone remember this point i made?
Falling is to impact as socialism is to communism.

reality is now rushing up to give us the grade on out theoretical papers.

🙂

back then we heard from FredHJR as we battled people like huxley… who was always trying to take the reasonable position…

and i pointed out, that it was the reasonable germans that made hitler possible. they did not want to take a side and then do something, they always wanted to take the middle and wait, and see… but never realized that by the time they would know, without a doubt, it would be way too late to see…

i even quoted eli weitzel (weisel) who has pointed out that he really didnt grasp the seriousness of this all until suddenly everything changed in one day (like in latvia)
but i also recommended reading Night by Elie Wiesel as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_%28book%29

we all remember or hear what was over the gate of auswitz… arbeit mach frei… work will set you free..
i guess being worked to death would do that and it was a kind of joke…

but what was over buchenwald?
Jedem das Seine
Literally “to each his own”, but figuratively “everyone gets what he deserves”

in a way, this will be true again…
after all, if the left fails, they will keep trying till they succeed – and if the left succeeds, jedem das seine…

Look no further than germany:
Imagine being a middle-class German in 1933. No one’s talking about exterminating millions of people – I mean, that would be just “lunatic” stuff, wouldn’t it? And you belong to a people that regards itself as the most civilized on the planet – with unsurpassed achievements in literature and music and science. You might, if you were so minded, call it Teutonic Exceptionalism. And you’re “progressive”, too: you pioneered the welfare state under Bismarck, and prototype hate-speech laws under the Weimar republic. And yes, some of the beer-hall crowd are a bit rough, but German Jews are the most assimilated on the planet. The idea that such a society would commit genocide is not just “lunatic”, it’s literally unimaginable.

Exerpt from: The Stupidity of Sophisticates
http://www.steynonline.com/7036/the-stupidity-of-sophisticates

its not hard to understand, your watching it
what was hard was to know that this was what was going on decades ago, not now, when its pretty easy to tell. mostly it has to do with people not knowing the mechanics, and only being told surface stuff, and mostly focusing on the end attrocities, not the begining.

after all… somehow they moved people from being normal and smart and that, to murdering their own countrymen when they were told X was responsible for things (like they do with whites, jews and christians now in the US), and that X cheats cause we are all equal, and that X has illegal privelege and we have to take that away, and help the poor people cheated by X, and if X is removed we will all be happy in a world as X is the source of all evil

of course, i tried to even bring up the german terms… it was interesting when i brought up Gliechshaltung, as others picked it up and started writing articles (neo, your being read by lots of people who write but dont post!)

then i brought up this term: Sprachregelung which was the nazi version of PC or politically correct.

the parallels to what is going on now to nazi germany would make you pee in your pants if you knew how many and what items and what point they played and so on… but we dont get that in our history, we get child morality plays that say x is bad… this is so wacko and wrong that we think that hitlers socialism is on the right, and communism on the left, and that freedom exists between two totalitarianisms.. or even that the left does not realize in its hatred of authoritarains and despots that that is the point of their efforts…

i wish neo would go over the salient parallels, they would shock… from gun control, the big lie, helping opposition to achieve goals, secret treaties, banning cultural things, vegetarianism, health movements, doctors getting state to intervene to help children in the future the way mengele did, schooling system, hatred of religion, destruction of cultural things, the abuse of social force molded by the administration and the 5th column, feminism, infertility, abortion as a means to social power and race perfection, post birth abortions, hatred of jews/christians, and on and on and on and on…

the list is so huge just listing it like that would result in my being cut down to size…

Yes, Obama’s presidency has been extremely instructive in that way, hasn’t it? One picture is worth a thousand words.