<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: King v. Burwell: SCOTUS rules that state subsidies are just fine and dandy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904698</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hussein didn&#039;t like Roberts. Which is perhaps all the more reason why they would get dirt or leverage on Roberts.

Petraeus was put into a similar situation, so he committed sepukku and outed himself, to avoid having it be used as leverage.

Hastert paid off the blackmail for years, instead. Sign of a difference in fortitude.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hussein didn&#8217;t like Roberts. Which is perhaps all the more reason why they would get dirt or leverage on Roberts.</p>
<p>Petraeus was put into a similar situation, so he committed sepukku and outed himself, to avoid having it be used as leverage.</p>
<p>Hastert paid off the blackmail for years, instead. Sign of a difference in fortitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: physicsguy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904222</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[physicsguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[KLSmith:  yes they were from the humanities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KLSmith:  yes they were from the humanities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dennis		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904205</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Harriet Myers was replaced by Alito after she withdrew.&quot;

Interesting.  The same conservative talk show hosts and pundits who criticized Harriet Miers because she didn&#039;t attend an elite law school were the same ones who subsequently talked incessantly about how wonderful Roberts would be.  the timing led me to the conclusion that Roberts was her replacement.

That said, my point stands.  The conservatives who are criticizing the Republican establishment have drunk the 
kool-aid that only graduates from elite law schools are fit to serve on the supreme court.  Perhaps the super competitive personality that is favored by the elite schools helps explain why so many Republican nominees to the court &quot;evolve&quot; over time to establish their legacy which they assume will be written by the left.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Harriet Myers was replaced by Alito after she withdrew.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting.  The same conservative talk show hosts and pundits who criticized Harriet Miers because she didn&#8217;t attend an elite law school were the same ones who subsequently talked incessantly about how wonderful Roberts would be.  the timing led me to the conclusion that Roberts was her replacement.</p>
<p>That said, my point stands.  The conservatives who are criticizing the Republican establishment have drunk the<br />
kool-aid that only graduates from elite law schools are fit to serve on the supreme court.  Perhaps the super competitive personality that is favored by the elite schools helps explain why so many Republican nominees to the court &#8220;evolve&#8221; over time to establish their legacy which they assume will be written by the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SCOTTtheBADGER		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCOTTtheBADGER]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One almost have to wonder if the rumors that the Obama administration has something on Roberts may have some foundaton in truth.  It would certainly be The Chicago Way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One almost have to wonder if the rumors that the Obama administration has something on Roberts may have some foundaton in truth.  It would certainly be The Chicago Way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So basically conservatives didn&#039;t like Miers, people like Krauthammer cited her non Ivy League education or lack of judge background as one thing.

People keep talking about Roberts after that but Alito&#039;s name comes up rarely. It&#039;s almost like Alito faded into the background, with Roberts taking most of the name recognition and media spotlight, with Miers being known for withdrawing and the conservative criticism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically conservatives didn&#8217;t like Miers, people like Krauthammer cited her non Ivy League education or lack of judge background as one thing.</p>
<p>People keep talking about Roberts after that but Alito&#8217;s name comes up rarely. It&#8217;s almost like Alito faded into the background, with Roberts taking most of the name recognition and media spotlight, with Miers being known for withdrawing and the conservative criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo-neocon		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo-neocon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 05:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Harriet Myers was not replaced by John Roberts.

Harriet Myers was replaced by Alito after she withdrew.

&lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Miers_Supreme_Court_nomination&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You can look it up.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Samuel Alito, a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, was nominated four days after her withdrawal and subsequently confirmed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why does this error persist that Miers was replaced by Roberts?  I&#039;ve seen it stated that way several times.  I think the mixup is because O&#039;Connor retired (that&#039;s who Miers was supposed to replace) and about two months thereafter Rehnquist died. Roberts had initially been nominated to replace O&#039;Connor (and Miers had been head of the search committe).  But before the hearings on Roberts began, Rehnquist died, and Bush switched the Roberts nomination over to having Roberts replace Rehnquist, and then nominated &lt;i&gt;Miers&lt;/i&gt; to replace &lt;i&gt;Roberts&lt;/i&gt; as the replacement for O&#039;Connor.  Then when Miers withdrew, Alito was nominated to replace her.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harriet Myers was not replaced by John Roberts.</p>
<p>Harriet Myers was replaced by Alito after she withdrew.</p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Miers_Supreme_Court_nomination" rel="nofollow">You can look it up.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Samuel Alito, a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, was nominated four days after her withdrawal and subsequently confirmed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why does this error persist that Miers was replaced by Roberts?  I&#8217;ve seen it stated that way several times.  I think the mixup is because O&#8217;Connor retired (that&#8217;s who Miers was supposed to replace) and about two months thereafter Rehnquist died. Roberts had initially been nominated to replace O&#8217;Connor (and Miers had been head of the search committe).  But before the hearings on Roberts began, Rehnquist died, and Bush switched the Roberts nomination over to having Roberts replace Rehnquist, and then nominated <i>Miers</i> to replace <i>Roberts</i> as the replacement for O&#8217;Connor.  Then when Miers withdrew, Alito was nominated to replace her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beverly		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beverly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 05:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I meant to say, that once you&#039;re in HellCare, you are not ALLOWED to buy only catastrophic insurance. Not ALLOWED to go concierge (infuriating enough to pay for your doctor visits while the stinking Leftists rob you blind to pay for all the illegal aliens and the Free Stuff Army layabouts.... @#$%^&#038;*()(*&#038;^%$#@!). 

Because it&#039;s now ILLEGAL in New York to go to a doctor who has any govt. business at all, and pay for your health care out of your Own Pocket.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say, that once you&#8217;re in HellCare, you are not ALLOWED to buy only catastrophic insurance. Not ALLOWED to go concierge (infuriating enough to pay for your doctor visits while the stinking Leftists rob you blind to pay for all the illegal aliens and the Free Stuff Army layabouts&#8230;. @#$%^&amp;*()(*&amp;^%$#@!). </p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s now ILLEGAL in New York to go to a doctor who has any govt. business at all, and pay for your health care out of your Own Pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beverly		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beverly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 05:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Reactions of passive resistance, the seeking of alternative routes, and non-participation strategies are anticipated by the left, and preemptively disallowed.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yep. I&#039;m in the stockyard already, and the chute is narrowing. Forced into their filthy system, being charged up the wazoo (more than my private insurance!!!) AND, new special hotness, they&#039;ve already sent a letter saying they&#039;re demanding an 11-12% INCREASE in the premiums.

Bad as this deal is, it&#039;s getting worse all the time. And will continue to do so.

Just wait until all the corporate employees are dumped into the Obamacare woodchipper. And THAT&#039;s why the Supreme Court locked it down in advance, so the kulaks can&#039;t escape.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Reactions of passive resistance, the seeking of alternative routes, and non-participation strategies are anticipated by the left, and preemptively disallowed.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yep. I&#8217;m in the stockyard already, and the chute is narrowing. Forced into their filthy system, being charged up the wazoo (more than my private insurance!!!) AND, new special hotness, they&#8217;ve already sent a letter saying they&#8217;re demanding an 11-12% INCREASE in the premiums.</p>
<p>Bad as this deal is, it&#8217;s getting worse all the time. And will continue to do so.</p>
<p>Just wait until all the corporate employees are dumped into the Obamacare woodchipper. And THAT&#8217;s why the Supreme Court locked it down in advance, so the kulaks can&#8217;t escape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KLSmith		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KLSmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 03:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[physicsguy: please tell us that the other faculty weren&#039;t from your own dept. they were from gender studies or sociology, right? please.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>physicsguy: please tell us that the other faculty weren&#8217;t from your own dept. they were from gender studies or sociology, right? please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/06/25/king-vs-burwell-scotus-rules-that-state-subsidies-are-just-fine-and-dandy/#comment-904163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 03:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=50192#comment-904163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;let me remind you that it was the conservative wing of the Republican party and multiple talk radio hosts who yelled and screamed to get rid of Harriet Miers as a nominee to the Supreme Court and to replace her with John Roberts.&lt;/b&gt;

That&#039;s what people were told happened.

Is that what instigated it or did the Left instigate it?

Nobody is immune to the Left&#039;s mind control and propaganda techniques, I remind you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>let me remind you that it was the conservative wing of the Republican party and multiple talk radio hosts who yelled and screamed to get rid of Harriet Miers as a nominee to the Supreme Court and to replace her with John Roberts.</b></p>
<p>That&#8217;s what people were told happened.</p>
<p>Is that what instigated it or did the Left instigate it?</p>
<p>Nobody is immune to the Left&#8217;s mind control and propaganda techniques, I remind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
