Comments on: Rand Paul takes a leaf out of…

By: NeoConScum

NeoConScum — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:07:37 +0000

Ymarsakar…”..before or after he bombed Bush’s ally Libya..?” Answer: Either.
___________________________________
I’ll always smile at the recollection of how quickly after the Evil Jorge Booosh brought down Sadam Hussein’s mass murdering buther regime in Iraq, Mr.Gaddafi opened his doors to inspections and volunteered to hand over any nuke progress there. BaaDaaBing. Like Dat.

After Obama’s pseudo actions in Libya with No Follow Thru, we got….Benghazi…Shame on that video maker!! BHO: VTC* (*VAST Testicular Concavity)

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:50:31 +0000

Libertarians think their foolish behavior of diverting attention to the two parties in DC makes them pure of soul? It proves the opposite. The power of the Left is such that everyone in DC becomes corrupted. Including the pure hearted so called Libertarians. When they accuse Republicans of being collaborators with Democrats, what proof can the Libertarians offer that they are immune to the Leftist corruption?

None whatsoever. They have voting records and talk, but then again so do the Republicans. That doesn’t last as long as people think under the Leftist regime.

By: ErisGuy

ErisGuy — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:27:16 +0000

And when the time comes to vote no “Republican” to voted for the NSA to spy without cause or warrant on all America will be eligible for my vote.

By: Steve

Steve — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:11:52 +0000

Who is doing Obama’s bidding on NSA domestic spying (that is what it is) and Obamatrade and immigration? Libertarians or the GOP establishment? Guess who is condescending to the views of the public? Not libertarians.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 04:20:35 +0000

I agree with Neo. Up until now I’ve admired Rand Paul, but now I have serious reservations about whether he is Presidential material. He hasn’t earned my vote.

By: Nolanimrod

Nolanimrod — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:25:53 +0000

Capital L’s are hip. They are reasonable. They are very modest in their demands upon us. All they require in order to refrain from accusing us of wanting to see the country devasted by terrorist attacks just to prove them wrong is that, on every issue of moment, we hold the one completely proper opinion, as do they.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:17:00 +0000

The Libertarians are the vanguard of the Leftist alliance in the mainstream. They were never designed as fringe kooks, that’s the role of Christians atm.

By: rickl

rickl — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:13:18 +0000

It’s threads like this that make me no longer interested in discussing politics.

We have two statist political parties, and the overwhelming majority of voters are statists. They’re perfectly willing to bend and twist the Constitution, or tear it up altogether, in service to their pet cause.

In today’s political landscape, the Founding Fathers would be closest to the Libertarians. They would not recognize Democrats and Republicans, and would find them both repugnant.

And they would be derided as fringe kooks by the “mainstream”.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 01:38:35 +0000

I don’t think people like Paul are playing with a full deck. They say they criticize the war mongers, but does the Left even allow Paul there to criticize Hussein Obola?

During an election cycle?

The Leftist alliance and the Libertarians seem to share too many commonalities and shared resources, for collusion and collaboration to be a coincidence. After all, it was the Libertarian Moral Righteous argument the Left used to explain why we had to accede to homo marriage and various other bullsh. Then look what happened, did the Libertarians defend the liberty of the Gaystapo targets?

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 01:36:37 +0000

Obama has been withdrawing, and we see what the effects of creating a vacuum are.

Before or after he bombed Bush’s ally Libya?