<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Here&#8217;s a challenge I&#8217;d like to see the NY Times take up	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 14:08:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pamela Geller &#38; The Enemy Within - Dennis G Hurst		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892485</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Geller &#38; The Enemy Within - Dennis G Hurst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 14:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] So here’s my challenge to the Times editors: give us some quotes from Geller. Some, you know, evidence of her hatred. Surely there must be reams and reams and reams. What has Geller said that’s so venomous and bigoted? About whom did she say it, all Muslims or Muslim terrorists? What was so hateful about the cartoon that won the contest, and why is it so obvious it wasn’t about free speech? neo-neocon [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So here’s my challenge to the Times editors: give us some quotes from Geller. Some, you know, evidence of her hatred. Surely there must be reams and reams and reams. What has Geller said that’s so venomous and bigoted? About whom did she say it, all Muslims or Muslim terrorists? What was so hateful about the cartoon that won the contest, and why is it so obvious it wasn’t about free speech? neo-neocon [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fromafar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fromafar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 01:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first link above didn&#039;t copy correctly....copy the entire link and paste it into your browser.  The other two work just fine...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first link above didn&#8217;t copy correctly&#8230;.copy the entire link and paste it into your browser.  The other two work just fine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fromafar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fromafar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 01:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And for some more exposure of the wrong headed Bill ORongly and Gang....see this three part discourse on the media fools...

&quot;O’Reilly Gang Wrong to Condemn Pamela Geller&quot;
Part 1
http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05
Î©/08/oreilly-gang-wrong-to-condemn-pamela-geller/

&quot;Laura Ingraham, Allysin Camerota, and Martha McCallum hiding behind Pam Geller’s Skirta&quot; Part 2
http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05/09/laura-ingraham-allysin-camerota-and-martha-mccallum-hiding-behind-pam-gellers-skirt/

&quot;The O’Reilly/Fox Gang, Pt. 3: Siding Against Geller and WesternCivilization&quot; Part 3
http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05/09/the-oreillyfox-gang-pt-3-siding-against-geller-and-western-civilization/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for some more exposure of the wrong headed Bill ORongly and Gang&#8230;.see this three part discourse on the media fools&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;O’Reilly Gang Wrong to Condemn Pamela Geller&#8221;<br />
Part 1<br />
<a href="http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05</a><br />
Î©/08/oreilly-gang-wrong-to-condemn-pamela-geller/</p>
<p>&#8220;Laura Ingraham, Allysin Camerota, and Martha McCallum hiding behind Pam Geller’s Skirta&#8221; Part 2<br />
<a href="http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05/09/laura-ingraham-allysin-camerota-and-martha-mccallum-hiding-behind-pam-gellers-skirt/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05/09/laura-ingraham-allysin-camerota-and-martha-mccallum-hiding-behind-pam-gellers-skirt/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The O’Reilly/Fox Gang, Pt. 3: Siding Against Geller and WesternCivilization&#8221; Part 3<br />
<a href="http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05/09/the-oreillyfox-gang-pt-3-siding-against-geller-and-western-civilization/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/05/09/the-oreillyfox-gang-pt-3-siding-against-geller-and-western-civilization/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: In Praise of Gerard Vanderleun @Van_der_Leun &#187; Today&#039;s America		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Praise of Gerard Vanderleun @Van_der_Leun &#187; Today&#039;s America]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2015 20:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] So here&#8217;s my challenge to the Times editors: give us some quotes from Geller. Some, you know, evidence of her hatred. Surely there must be reams and reams and reams. What has Geller said that&#8217;s so venomous and bigoted? About whom did she say it, all Muslims or Muslim terrorists? What was so hateful about the cartoon that won the contest, and why is it so obvious it wasn&#8217;t about free speech? neo-neocon [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So here&rsquo;s my challenge to the Times editors: give us some quotes from Geller. Some, you know, evidence of her hatred. Surely there must be reams and reams and reams. What has Geller said that&rsquo;s so venomous and bigoted? About whom did she say it, all Muslims or Muslim terrorists? What was so hateful about the cartoon that won the contest, and why is it so obvious it wasn&rsquo;t about free speech? neo-neocon [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ErisGuy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892306</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ErisGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2015 11:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Geller excoriates Islam in milder terms than homosexuals excoriate Christianity and feminists excoriate the imaginary patriarchy. Terminate all homosexual and feminist speech, then we&#039;ll worry about Geller.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geller excoriates Islam in milder terms than homosexuals excoriate Christianity and feminists excoriate the imaginary patriarchy. Terminate all homosexual and feminist speech, then we&#8217;ll worry about Geller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 22:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[JJ: &quot;It occurs to me that you have a book, or at least a very long essay, in you covering the same ground with your particular viewpoint.&quot;

At least. My FAQ-style &lt;a href=&quot;http://learning-curve.blogspot.com/2014/05/operation-iraqi-freedom-faq.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;explanation&lt;/a&gt;, intended for breadth more than depth, alone amounts to about 40 pages single-spaced, and that doesn&#039;t include the handful of linked posts that provide extra depth in key areas such as the UNSCR 688 humanitarian mandates, ISG findings of disarmament violations, and international controversy carried over from Operation Desert Fox. My take is scalable.

JJ: &quot;Such a book &lt;b&gt;at this time&lt;/b&gt; might have some influence on narrative.&quot; 

Right now, Iraq, the Middle East, and the War on Terror are leading current events, and to guard against regression and reinforce their gains, Left activists have ramped up their narrative of OIF that&#039;s the cornerstone premise for their current political advantage. With the GOP&#039;s weak stance on the Iraq issue, the Left emphasis on their narrative of OIF is only rational. But the intensified Left activist attention opens a window to &#039;re-litigate&#039; the justification for OIF that could be seized by counter-Left activists wielding my take.

Moreover, the current front-runners for the 2016 presidential campaign happen to be leading members of houses Clinton and Bush, and my explanation of the law and policy, fact basis for OIF is based primarily on the Clinton-to-Bush nexus that enforced the UNSCR 660-series resolutions with Clinton&#039;s Iraq enforcement as &lt;a href=&quot;http://learning-curve.blogspot.com/2015/03/12th-anniversary-of-Operation-Iraqi-Freedom.html#clinton&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;center of gravity&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Bush&#039;s case against Saddam was really Clinton&#039;s case against Saddam&quot;.

We don&#039;t get to rewind the clock back to November 2008 nor undo every catastrophic American error with Iraq since 2009. But maybe we can clean out the festering infection of the Left&#039;s false narrative of OIF at the premise level in order to begin re-righting American leadership and heal our nation&#039;s policy decision-making.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ: &#8220;It occurs to me that you have a book, or at least a very long essay, in you covering the same ground with your particular viewpoint.&#8221;</p>
<p>At least. My FAQ-style <a href="http://learning-curve.blogspot.com/2014/05/operation-iraqi-freedom-faq.html" rel="nofollow">explanation</a>, intended for breadth more than depth, alone amounts to about 40 pages single-spaced, and that doesn&#8217;t include the handful of linked posts that provide extra depth in key areas such as the UNSCR 688 humanitarian mandates, ISG findings of disarmament violations, and international controversy carried over from Operation Desert Fox. My take is scalable.</p>
<p>JJ: &#8220;Such a book <b>at this time</b> might have some influence on narrative.&#8221; </p>
<p>Right now, Iraq, the Middle East, and the War on Terror are leading current events, and to guard against regression and reinforce their gains, Left activists have ramped up their narrative of OIF that&#8217;s the cornerstone premise for their current political advantage. With the GOP&#8217;s weak stance on the Iraq issue, the Left emphasis on their narrative of OIF is only rational. But the intensified Left activist attention opens a window to &#8216;re-litigate&#8217; the justification for OIF that could be seized by counter-Left activists wielding my take.</p>
<p>Moreover, the current front-runners for the 2016 presidential campaign happen to be leading members of houses Clinton and Bush, and my explanation of the law and policy, fact basis for OIF is based primarily on the Clinton-to-Bush nexus that enforced the UNSCR 660-series resolutions with Clinton&#8217;s Iraq enforcement as <a href="http://learning-curve.blogspot.com/2015/03/12th-anniversary-of-Operation-Iraqi-Freedom.html#clinton" rel="nofollow">center of gravity</a>, &#8220;Bush&#8217;s case against Saddam was really Clinton&#8217;s case against Saddam&#8221;.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t get to rewind the clock back to November 2008 nor undo every catastrophic American error with Iraq since 2009. But maybe we can clean out the festering infection of the Left&#8217;s false narrative of OIF at the premise level in order to begin re-righting American leadership and heal our nation&#8217;s policy decision-making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.J.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 19:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eric,
I hope you&#039;re still monitoring this thread. I&#039;ve been very busy the last  few weeks and haven&#039;t had much time to read/comment.

Glad you got into Jean Kirkpatrick&#039;s book. It occurs to me that you have a book, or at least a very long essay, in you covering the same ground with your particular viewpoint. Maybe Regnery would be interested. They publish conservative books. They&#039;re at: www.regnery.com

Such a book at this time might have some influence on narrative. It couldn&#039;t hurt to try.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
I hope you&#8217;re still monitoring this thread. I&#8217;ve been very busy the last  few weeks and haven&#8217;t had much time to read/comment.</p>
<p>Glad you got into Jean Kirkpatrick&#8217;s book. It occurs to me that you have a book, or at least a very long essay, in you covering the same ground with your particular viewpoint. Maybe Regnery would be interested. They publish conservative books. They&#8217;re at: <a href="http://www.regnery.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.regnery.com</a></p>
<p>Such a book at this time might have some influence on narrative. It couldn&#8217;t hurt to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey: &quot;Or, perhaps, after the fact of murder for its own sake, some apologists try to gin up some act or another by the victims as “offensive”.&quot;

The &quot;perhaps&quot; in their assigning cause to perpetrator, victim, or even 3rd party in the Narrative contest of the activist game depends on cost/benefit political calculation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Aubrey: &#8220;Or, perhaps, after the fact of murder for its own sake, some apologists try to gin up some act or another by the victims as “offensive”.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;perhaps&#8221; in their assigning cause to perpetrator, victim, or even 3rd party in the Narrative contest of the activist game depends on cost/benefit political calculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Who is defending Pam Gellerâ€™s liberty? - Freedom&#039;s Floodgates		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892077</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who is defending Pam Gellerâ€™s liberty? - Freedom&#039;s Floodgates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the NY Times, Lubet seems to feel little obligation to illustrate what he&#8217;s talking about when he [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the NY Times, Lubet seems to feel little obligation to illustrate what he&#8217;s talking about when he [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/05/08/heres-a-challenge-id-like-to-see-the-ny-times-take-up/#comment-892076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2015 14:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=49016#comment-892076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Implicit, and not particularly hidden in its implicitness, is the implication that we must expect Islam to generate a certain percentage of violent nutcases who can&#039;t keep themselves from killing others on the basis of one or another presumed offense.
No other group is thus vilified and stereotyped....
Considering none of the other homegrown terrorist actions, successful or not, have been in response to cartoons, it appears that, for Islam, &quot;offense&quot; is a pretty broad concept.
Or, perhaps, after the fact of murder for its own sake, some apologists try to gin up some act or another by the victims as &quot;offensive&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Implicit, and not particularly hidden in its implicitness, is the implication that we must expect Islam to generate a certain percentage of violent nutcases who can&#8217;t keep themselves from killing others on the basis of one or another presumed offense.<br />
No other group is thus vilified and stereotyped&#8230;.<br />
Considering none of the other homegrown terrorist actions, successful or not, have been in response to cartoons, it appears that, for Islam, &#8220;offense&#8221; is a pretty broad concept.<br />
Or, perhaps, after the fact of murder for its own sake, some apologists try to gin up some act or another by the victims as &#8220;offensive&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
