Comments on: Pam Geller and hate

By: Michael

Michael — Sat, 09 May 2015 06:38:11 +0000

I have yet to grasp what is so ‘wrong’ about hating islam? The teaching encourages deceit, discrimination, brutality and murder — why wouldn’t everyone hate that? Pretending that it means ‘peace’ when it actually means ‘surrender’ is beyond stupid.
It explicitly require followers to “get along’ as long as they are in the minority, then permits violence, when they are in the majority…and fully sanctions lying as a way to further their agenda …who wouldn’t hate that?
Believing that the Twin Towers, Ft Hood or this event in Texas was ‘justified’ is totally insane.
They simply look for an excuse to do what they plan to do in the first place. Blaming anything or anyone but this primitive barbaric and savage cult is ridiculous!

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Fri, 08 May 2015 16:02:06 +0000

but I still love many people in spite of that.

It would be difficult to respect anyone if they killed their own conscience in order to agree with Authority or with me. That is something to be despised, that weakness. Buttering up a Californian kiss up. They do that a lot there.

By: Daniel in Brookline

Daniel in Brookline — Fri, 08 May 2015 15:30:08 +0000

jon baker: a good point!

Please note also the language used: “we need to accept the fact that [insert indefensible assertion here]”. (Yes, I realize you’re paraphrasing. Let us stipulate that you are doing so with reasonable accuracy.)

This is a debating tactic I’ve seen used again and again, primarily by the Left but solely by them — assuming that which is to be proved and shutting down argument. It would not be any different, logically, had your Facebook opponent said “We need to accept the fact that my position is correct, and that you’re an immoral scumbag”. I think an appropriate response to that is contempt: “No, I do not accept your premise. If you want to convince me, you’re going to have to work at it. Good luck.”

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Fri, 08 May 2015 15:18:02 +0000

Leftists can only love drones and women prone on the ground that are helpless. That’s basically how they are.

By: jon baker

jon baker — Fri, 08 May 2015 04:01:10 +0000

“Ray” mentioned projection. Some time ago I was in a FB debate when I saw someone on the other side say something like “We need to accept the fact that in or to love someone you must accept everything they do” or words to that effect. As I was thinking about that later on I realized that person was projecting that they did not love anyone that disagreed with them on something. There is no one in the world that I am in total, constant agreement with…but I still love many people in spite of that. I have come to suspect that the reason many on the left accuse people on the right of being “haters” is that we disagree with them and it is a natural thing in their mind to hate anyone they disagree with-hence if we disagree with someone-we must hate them (in their way of thinking).

By: J.J.

J.J. — Fri, 08 May 2015 02:59:03 +0000

Pamela Geller gave a test on the First Amendment and the MSM (as well as too many conservative pundits) failed. Not really a big surprise. Free Speech was endangered even before Obama came into office. It’s gotten much worse under him, though.

May God (or Jehovah) bless Pam Geller. The woman is a fighter.

By: G6loq

G6loq — Fri, 08 May 2015 02:31:16 +0000

Josh Marshall should cease to exist. “They Bring a Knife… We Bring a Gun” “Get in Their Faces!” “Hit Back Twice As Hard” “It’s time to Fight for it.” “Punish your enemies.” “I’m itching for a fight.”

By: avi

avi — Fri, 08 May 2015 01:58:05 +0000

the Stasi’s of the world-“Islamophobia kills more than terrorism!”

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Fri, 08 May 2015 01:31:40 +0000

Neo, part of it is the aura of authority, personal authority, around them. Certain individuals have magnetic personalities or auras which can be seen or felt in the same room.

Since the Left obeys no authority other than their Messiah or priests of death cult, when they see that aura from an enemy, it is not something they can ignore. They know that they are in the presence of an enemy priest, someone that can call in troops from our side.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Fri, 08 May 2015 00:45:16 +0000

G6loq

That’s a good point, although it’s hard to tell one way or another given the Left’s historical influence and black ops.

For example, a lot of homos report being molested or having had bad relations with the opposite gender. And feminists report being afraid of rape or having been raped.

So who is doing the raping and molesting? Christian Catholic priests?

No, I think it all goes back to the Left. Heck, even the Catholic priest thing could be traced back to Leftists in 1930.

Check out 1980s regressive hypnotic “memory recovery”, also known as mind control, brain washing, and false memory implantation.

What memories did Leftist agents implant, what were they experimenting with?

Childhood rape and molestation trauma, that’s what they implanted.

So who are the rapists and molestors creating male fearing and hating feminists? Who are the rapists and molestors creating women that can’t secure their kitchen, domain, and families? Who are the rapists and molestors creating shock homos?

Leftists. It’s always the Leftists, somehow. It’s like they have all kinds of power they don’t show us, all kinds of ops and agents we don’t know about.