Thwap!

We are all responsible. There is no victimhood at large except for … children.

I know. Fake but accurate. 🙂

It’s a good quote, but it’s not at all clear who said it. When I tried to find more about it, I could find no original source. See this.

The issue is:
The danger to America is not Barrack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with no accomplishment or qualification to give any hint that he would or could execute the duties of the world,s most important job..

It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of this President than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved uneducated electorate looking for handouts thus willing to elect such unqualified men for their president.

The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.

The Republic can survive a Barrack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president.

” Author …..Former Premier of the Czech Republic Vaclav Klaus.

…nor was the MSM responsible for 52% of the public ignoring a resume that consisted almost entirely of red flags.

I respectfully disagree. The MSM significantly abetted the public’s ignorance by not mentioning–or seriously downplaying–the “red flags,” and spending all their efforts cheerleading in the most embarrassingly fawning ass-kissing way on behalf of their wondrous, transformational, most-intelligent-ever, dream-candidate, The One.

Almost anyone else with Obama’s lack of experience, hard-left, nasty politics and odious associations would have been hammered day after day by the MSM, eg:
How is it possible, Mr Obama, to belong for two decades to a church run by an America-hating racist and remain ignorant of this? Did you sleep through all the sermons? Why shouldn’t we assume that a member of Mr Wright’s church would absorb or agree with his sentiments? Why won’t you release your college transcripts? How can someone with the most liberal voting record in the senate claim to be a “uniter”? Wouldn’t such an extreme position be divisive? etc, etc, etc.

Admittedly, some of that 52% never would have listened to anything negative about their hero, but a significant portion would have. That 52% probably contained at least 16% – 20% LIVs. If just a quarter of whom (4% – 5% of the vote) had flipped or stayed home, Obama would have lost. And reversing just 25% of wishy-washy LIVs is not that great a feat–had the MSM given Obama a normal level of scrutiny.

But they didn’t. They actively protected him, as they continue to do even now–hence this very post about the MSM’s failure to report King Barack’s many, many egregious lies.

“U.S.A.! U.S.A.!”

I know why we don’t want to admit that: The admission means we have to stand and fight; or else shelter in place and lose the last hope of humanity.

What a horrible choice we have.

I will know when we have made the decision: when we no longer as “why?” – about the MSM, Democrats, Obama, Lies, etc., etc. What a ridiculous question. The mere posing of it shows a lack of seriousness that is monumental and tragic in its own right. The posing of the question shows a level of decline and decay that is perhaps insurmountable in itself.

The day it is not asked will therefore be in its won self like the dawn of a new day where hope, small as it might be, rises over a distant horizon.

My guess is it will be a youth movement – by the young in body, and in spirit.

The befuddled pretenders will continues to “Why?” us to death and behave as if some rational argument and demonstration will make the devil himself change his plans about the war of hell against heaven.

Of course JournoListic press will not report his lies. They know who provides the opiates. Follow the secular profits of wealth, pleasure, leisure, and narcissistic indulgence, with a side of sanctimonious hypocrisy.

Preach it, bro, I have been saying this for years. Bob from Virginia, you are right that the financial meltdown was a big factor in the Republican loss in 2008 without much help from the MSM. But the reason a comparatively unknown Obama was nominated in the first place over HRC was the MSM. And while the press has always leaned left their naked partisanship has ballooned dramatically since 2000 and especially in the age of Obama.