Neo you undermining this case with your statement.
If review Iran regime fiddling with different style of attacks and terrorists activities from US embassy in Beirut, Kuwaiti Airplane highjacking throwing passenger bodies on the runway, and more like the bombing in Argentine, finally officially threatening the countries in the region many times most importantly closing the world most livable sea route of major oil supply all those not of concern to you by stating what you said.

So what you think Iran regime will do if he have some sort of nuclear power?
Remember N. Korea you neighbor how they look now after they got their hand on have some nuclear attack

Neoneocon used the word treason.
It is.

Prepare.

As to Iran, think North Korea, comic strip like North Korea, spoofable North Korea … a lists of their actions from a 2004 book, still going strong:here
In particular this item:

On October 9, 1983, North Korea’s Dear Leader made an audacious attach on the president of South Korea, his cabinet and about 50 top South Korean business leaders. A huge bomb was detonated as this group was visiting Rangoon, Burma. An error in timing spared the president, but South Korea lost one fifth of its cabinet. This occurred the day after North Korea initiated a new peace move. “This has been a very common North Korean negotiating tactic–to lull the enemy to sleep with peace offerings just before striking.” (89-91)

and, from the book:
“The Kim Jong Il regime resembles a cult-based, family-run criminal enterprise rather than a government.” It is “an outlaw regime whose leadership is cunning, brazen, and absolutely ruthless.” “It is also a regime against which a policy of appeasement, sometimes called a ‘sunshine’ policy, is spectacularly inappropriate.” (103) “The choice is stark: be firm for become a victim.” (104)

Meanwhile, in the real world that is soon to kick us in the teeth, the Iranian regime has released a menacing video of and statement describing and commenting on the recent Revolutionary Guards’ war game in the Persian Gulf/Strait of Hormuz, during which their land and sea-based cruise missile attacks destroyed a full sized mock-up of a U.S. Nimitz class super carrier.

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/WATCH-Iranian-cruise-missiles-blow-up-life-size-replica-of-American-aircraft-carrier-392156

Obama was historic.

This could be a disaster.

Now things are so out of the range of normality that we cannot afford to be … smug.
No survival value in smugness.

Here a piece I referenced in an earlier thread. HOGWASH said the Jew who was just made an “Honorary Arian”, Hitler, pffuiii, passing phenomenon said the smug of the times:
here [they even financed Hitler.]

“To be personally delivered to Obama.” printed on a intercontinental missile paraded through Moscow shown at the GatewayPundit link above referenced by the great Artfldgr.
In due course the 1930’s smugs sheepishly boarded the cattle cars.

Now are not the times for smug normalcy bias …
Nope.

The article linked to is complete bluster and total hogwash.

Putin has repeatedly stated that he seeks for Russia a return to superpower status and ideally, a return to the former Soviet Union’s territorial borders. But Russia lacks the industrial and technological resources to decisively challenge the US for dominance. So subterfuge is the obvious ploy in such a circumstance.

Russia has been the main facilitator of Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons capability. The Russians have consistently and over a long period provided protection in the UN for Iran against debilitating international sanctions.

The Russians are NOT Muslim sympathizers, so the vital assistance they have provided has to have a self-serving motivation. The only explanation that fits is that they are using Iran as a proxy, as a covert means of aggression against the US. The aim of which is to reduce as much as possible, America’s global presence and influence. It’s a lilliputian/guerrilla strategy; tie your opponent down, drain his resources and spread his resources thin with dozens of minor conflicts around the world.

As for the Pentagon, yes they missed that one but as it was a relatively remote regional conflict, (prior to Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait, how many Americans could locate it on a map?) so perhaps it’s understandable that it was ‘below their radar’. Presumably, disturbing Russian activities are at a much higher priority. But if they are not, look for politics as the determinative explanation.