<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The fog of GOP war: the late-term abortion bill	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865635</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Left is killing Western culture and people are still arguing about laws and politics. The focus is a bit outdated by now and strategically misplaced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left is killing Western culture and people are still arguing about laws and politics. The focus is a bit outdated by now and strategically misplaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anna		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865515</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Geoffrey:

I did not argue (but perhaps it was not sufficiently clear) that men cannot intellectually appreciate the discussion on abortion to the same extent as women can; rather, I pointed out the impossibility for men (as a function of the biological difference between men and women) to find themselves pregnant after a rape, i.e. to experience the situation directly. 

It is a separate question whether or not the fact that their physiology shields men from that particular threat ought to be a factor in how much weight we attribute to their opinions when a change of legislation is discussed, particularly of a kind that would potentially pose more stringent claims upon other people&#039;s bodies but would never apply to theirs&#039;. This may strike a nerve with some women, even when faced with an intellectually honest, well-disposed interlocutor. I am not sure what to make of it, it may be understandable as an emotional reaction, but the issue is perhaps too grave to be written off as a &quot;woman&#039;s issue&quot; and not addressed, on some level, by the whole of society.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoffrey:</p>
<p>I did not argue (but perhaps it was not sufficiently clear) that men cannot intellectually appreciate the discussion on abortion to the same extent as women can; rather, I pointed out the impossibility for men (as a function of the biological difference between men and women) to find themselves pregnant after a rape, i.e. to experience the situation directly. </p>
<p>It is a separate question whether or not the fact that their physiology shields men from that particular threat ought to be a factor in how much weight we attribute to their opinions when a change of legislation is discussed, particularly of a kind that would potentially pose more stringent claims upon other people&#8217;s bodies but would never apply to theirs&#8217;. This may strike a nerve with some women, even when faced with an intellectually honest, well-disposed interlocutor. I am not sure what to make of it, it may be understandable as an emotional reaction, but the issue is perhaps too grave to be written off as a &#8220;woman&#8217;s issue&#8221; and not addressed, on some level, by the whole of society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sharon W		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865482</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ArmyMom--The most moving testimony I ever heard personally was given by a speaker that had been raped (and was a virgin), 1950&#039;s, and had the child and gave her up for adoption.  Her daughter, in adulthood, made contact with her and she was met at the airport by the daughter and her husband, whose first words were, &quot;thank you for not aborting my wife&quot;.  At the end of the first trimester, that is a baby, with distinct fingerprints.  If unbelievers want their abortions, have it before 3 months and certainly don&#039;t make the taxpayer participate in the death of a baby.  In 1981, I gave birth to our daughter, social disapproval alive and well and long before the commonality of single-women having children.  My husband and I married when she was 18 months old, having been together since I was 17.  So I know personally the stress of finding out your pregnant when YOU have other plans.     The tenant of legal abortion being &quot;safe and rare&quot; turned out to be just more liberal nonsense.  By and large the stigma of unwed birth is gone, and we all know the &quot;welfare safety net&quot; is available and bloated, but abortion is anything but rare.  In fact it is BIG BUSINESS! And to boot, we have myriad children being born to single woman, no father in the picture. What a mess!  I just read that 27 late-term abortions are performed in this country every day.  Absolutely abhorrent!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ArmyMom&#8211;The most moving testimony I ever heard personally was given by a speaker that had been raped (and was a virgin), 1950&#8217;s, and had the child and gave her up for adoption.  Her daughter, in adulthood, made contact with her and she was met at the airport by the daughter and her husband, whose first words were, &#8220;thank you for not aborting my wife&#8221;.  At the end of the first trimester, that is a baby, with distinct fingerprints.  If unbelievers want their abortions, have it before 3 months and certainly don&#8217;t make the taxpayer participate in the death of a baby.  In 1981, I gave birth to our daughter, social disapproval alive and well and long before the commonality of single-women having children.  My husband and I married when she was 18 months old, having been together since I was 17.  So I know personally the stress of finding out your pregnant when YOU have other plans.     The tenant of legal abortion being &#8220;safe and rare&#8221; turned out to be just more liberal nonsense.  By and large the stigma of unwed birth is gone, and we all know the &#8220;welfare safety net&#8221; is available and bloated, but abortion is anything but rare.  In fact it is BIG BUSINESS! And to boot, we have myriad children being born to single woman, no father in the picture. What a mess!  I just read that 27 late-term abortions are performed in this country every day.  Absolutely abhorrent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anna		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865469</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ArmyMom:

It is one thing to assume the negatives of carrying the child to term as a result of a personal decision to engage in the activities that may lead to it - being legally forced to go through a process that will cause irreversible body damage and jeopardize the woman&#039;s health and her life only adds insult to the injury and completely devalues any consideration that a *woman*, too, might have a legitimate claim to want to prevent that process and those risks, if she can, in a situation she did not choose it. It is true, however, that having an abortion carries its own set of risks, which may in many cases outweigh the ones associated with the pregnancy. As I said, it is a no-win situation, but that is the one situation in which I hold that the woman should have the right to choose (while keeping the discussion intellectually honest: it IS taking an innocent life no less, and it IS a dangerous procedure with its own set of risks - but it must be offered as an option within a limited time frame).

To be honest, I get somewhat distrubed whenever the discussion is framed ONLY in terms of the interests of the child. I do agree that women have a moral responsibility towards children conceived under ordinary circumstances, which implies assuming the risks and the consequences, but pregnancy and childbirth are no joke (and THAT, too, is something young people should be taught, including all of the things that may go wrong and with what probability, so they can make an informed decision in the matter) and it seems to me very cruel to legally force them upon somebody in that situation, like the El Salvador model.

Personally, I urge for only two exceptions: mother&#039;s life or health endangered by the continuation of pregnancy (no strict time limit) and rape (strict time limit).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ArmyMom:</p>
<p>It is one thing to assume the negatives of carrying the child to term as a result of a personal decision to engage in the activities that may lead to it &#8211; being legally forced to go through a process that will cause irreversible body damage and jeopardize the woman&#8217;s health and her life only adds insult to the injury and completely devalues any consideration that a *woman*, too, might have a legitimate claim to want to prevent that process and those risks, if she can, in a situation she did not choose it. It is true, however, that having an abortion carries its own set of risks, which may in many cases outweigh the ones associated with the pregnancy. As I said, it is a no-win situation, but that is the one situation in which I hold that the woman should have the right to choose (while keeping the discussion intellectually honest: it IS taking an innocent life no less, and it IS a dangerous procedure with its own set of risks &#8211; but it must be offered as an option within a limited time frame).</p>
<p>To be honest, I get somewhat distrubed whenever the discussion is framed ONLY in terms of the interests of the child. I do agree that women have a moral responsibility towards children conceived under ordinary circumstances, which implies assuming the risks and the consequences, but pregnancy and childbirth are no joke (and THAT, too, is something young people should be taught, including all of the things that may go wrong and with what probability, so they can make an informed decision in the matter) and it seems to me very cruel to legally force them upon somebody in that situation, like the El Salvador model.</p>
<p>Personally, I urge for only two exceptions: mother&#8217;s life or health endangered by the continuation of pregnancy (no strict time limit) and rape (strict time limit).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Factchecker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Factchecker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;It appears that, to qualify for a late-term abortion through a rape exception, a woman would have had to have reported the abortion to authorities earlier, a requirement meant to insure that the pregnancy really did result from rape.&quot;

Isn&#039;t it the rape that is supposed to be reported earlier?  That&#039;s what it says in the later passage you quoted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It appears that, to qualify for a late-term abortion through a rape exception, a woman would have had to have reported the abortion to authorities earlier, a requirement meant to insure that the pregnancy really did result from rape.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it the rape that is supposed to be reported earlier?  That&#8217;s what it says in the later passage you quoted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anna		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just to clarify, my comments were in response to a more general discussion regarding abortion as such, i.e. not specifically concerning late term abortions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify, my comments were in response to a more general discussion regarding abortion as such, i.e. not specifically concerning late term abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Glen H		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So I can understand the arguments for a rape exception to a blanket ban on abortion. But I don&#039;t understand why this bill needs any language on rape. It bans an abortion after 20 weeks. Is there seriously a woman anywhere that would proceed five months into a pregnancy, and only then decide she needs an abortion because she was raped?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I can understand the arguments for a rape exception to a blanket ban on abortion. But I don&#8217;t understand why this bill needs any language on rape. It bans an abortion after 20 weeks. Is there seriously a woman anywhere that would proceed five months into a pregnancy, and only then decide she needs an abortion because she was raped?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ArmyMom		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArmyMom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well said Sharon W!  As an adopted child I am so glad that my birth mother chose life.  My parents who were unable to have children raised 2 adopted children and never let us feel as if we were not their natural children.  I asked for information on my birth mother a while back and found out that she was very young and did know who my birth father was but that the father wanted nothing to do with a baby.  I do not think my bmom was raped.  I have 3 children who would have not been here had my bmom aborted me.  One son served in the Army protecting us all, my second son is deeply religious and is a counselor for people who are addicted and my daughter is working with wildlife.  I now have a beautiful granddaughter who continues the wonderful legacy of my parents and yes my bmom.  Every time I think of someone aborting a child I think that this is what they are cutting themselves off from.

It is strange to me that in todays world that if my bmom had chosen to kill me even late term that there are many who think of themselves as pro-life that would approve.  After all, I am sure that my bmom was traumatized when she found out she was pregnant and likely was pressured by her friends to &quot;get rid of it&quot;.  

I also think it is interesting that so much attention is focused on some of the negatives of carrying a baby to term as if when raped one is more likely to have those negatives occur.  I would say that women who have abortions in general have just as many negative health issues and many times have great difficulty having children later on.

And if a woman becomes pregnant after being raped the innocent baby is treated as &quot;a thing&quot; more so then in all other cases even though the baby deserves life as much as the raped woman deserves counseling and healing.  To condone late term abortion after 20 weeks is just wrong to me especially since in our kill happy culture there are sadly ample opportunities to abort a baby well before that.

Raped or not, if you become pregnant there is a life growing in a woman.  If an abortion is performed there is death.  A raped woman will heal with much care and love.  An aborted baby is just dead.  And before anyone gets on their high horse and asks if I would take that view with my own daughter or granddaughter if they were raped my answer is Yes.  I have spoken with my daughter about this very thing and we are in agreement about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Sharon W!  As an adopted child I am so glad that my birth mother chose life.  My parents who were unable to have children raised 2 adopted children and never let us feel as if we were not their natural children.  I asked for information on my birth mother a while back and found out that she was very young and did know who my birth father was but that the father wanted nothing to do with a baby.  I do not think my bmom was raped.  I have 3 children who would have not been here had my bmom aborted me.  One son served in the Army protecting us all, my second son is deeply religious and is a counselor for people who are addicted and my daughter is working with wildlife.  I now have a beautiful granddaughter who continues the wonderful legacy of my parents and yes my bmom.  Every time I think of someone aborting a child I think that this is what they are cutting themselves off from.</p>
<p>It is strange to me that in todays world that if my bmom had chosen to kill me even late term that there are many who think of themselves as pro-life that would approve.  After all, I am sure that my bmom was traumatized when she found out she was pregnant and likely was pressured by her friends to &#8220;get rid of it&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I also think it is interesting that so much attention is focused on some of the negatives of carrying a baby to term as if when raped one is more likely to have those negatives occur.  I would say that women who have abortions in general have just as many negative health issues and many times have great difficulty having children later on.</p>
<p>And if a woman becomes pregnant after being raped the innocent baby is treated as &#8220;a thing&#8221; more so then in all other cases even though the baby deserves life as much as the raped woman deserves counseling and healing.  To condone late term abortion after 20 weeks is just wrong to me especially since in our kill happy culture there are sadly ample opportunities to abort a baby well before that.</p>
<p>Raped or not, if you become pregnant there is a life growing in a woman.  If an abortion is performed there is death.  A raped woman will heal with much care and love.  An aborted baby is just dead.  And before anyone gets on their high horse and asks if I would take that view with my own daughter or granddaughter if they were raped my answer is Yes.  I have spoken with my daughter about this very thing and we are in agreement about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sharon W		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865395</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We are discussing abortions after 20 weeks gestation.   Am I to believe that a rape victim carries a child 20 weeks and then seeks an abortion?  We have the most liberal abortion laws in the western world.  I&#039;ve marveled reading among these comments the concern about GOP leadership and appeal to &quot;women&quot; and the &quot;young&quot;.  Ignorant and immoral would be a better description.   It&#039;s time to uncover the deception regarding the practice of late term abortion.  They are dangerous procedures.  When I suffered a miscarriage at 20 weeks I couldn&#039;t find a qualified doctor to perform the  D&#038;C as it was considered dangerous.   I had to go home and wait for natural expulsion to occur.  I challenge any one here taking the position of wanting to leave a loophole for this procedure to actually read about how the abortion is performed.  Oh and also make the case for waiting 20 weeks to decide!!  No excuses in this day of technology.   The Hippocratic Oath forbade abortificients as in &quot;first do no harm&quot;.  In this case the Ancient Greeks possessed more wisdom than our nihilistic culture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are discussing abortions after 20 weeks gestation.   Am I to believe that a rape victim carries a child 20 weeks and then seeks an abortion?  We have the most liberal abortion laws in the western world.  I&#8217;ve marveled reading among these comments the concern about GOP leadership and appeal to &#8220;women&#8221; and the &#8220;young&#8221;.  Ignorant and immoral would be a better description.   It&#8217;s time to uncover the deception regarding the practice of late term abortion.  They are dangerous procedures.  When I suffered a miscarriage at 20 weeks I couldn&#8217;t find a qualified doctor to perform the  D&amp;C as it was considered dangerous.   I had to go home and wait for natural expulsion to occur.  I challenge any one here taking the position of wanting to leave a loophole for this procedure to actually read about how the abortion is performed.  Oh and also make the case for waiting 20 weeks to decide!!  No excuses in this day of technology.   The Hippocratic Oath forbade abortificients as in &#8220;first do no harm&#8221;.  In this case the Ancient Greeks possessed more wisdom than our nihilistic culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fiona		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2015/01/22/the-fog-of-gop-war-the-late-term-abortion-bill/#comment-865383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fiona]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/?p=46019#comment-865383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[IF a rape is reported, cannot the &quot;morning after&quot; pill be administered?  Isn&#039;t a D&#038;C usually done as part of the process.  Here understand that a good part of the Gosnell clientele were YOUNG teenage black girls who had more or less willing sex with slightly older guys and were afraid to tell their mothers when they turned out pregnant, or hoped to secure the attention of their baby daddies.  Can we stop assuming that all abortions are performed for middle and upper class white women?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF a rape is reported, cannot the &#8220;morning after&#8221; pill be administered?  Isn&#8217;t a D&amp;C usually done as part of the process.  Here understand that a good part of the Gosnell clientele were YOUNG teenage black girls who had more or less willing sex with slightly older guys and were afraid to tell their mothers when they turned out pregnant, or hoped to secure the attention of their baby daddies.  Can we stop assuming that all abortions are performed for middle and upper class white women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
