Think it through:

America is ALREADY watching ALL the world’s seaborne traffic — to the limit of our technical means. (fantastic)

ANY floater that transits from Iran towards our harbors will be stopped.

The resulting politics would be terminal for Tehran — and perhaps Barry Soetoro.

( Even with shielding, SOME trickle of radiation leaks from a bomb. The technical issue is how sensitive your detector might be and how sloppy the shielding might be. So creeping into NY harbor is not a viable delivery method — risks (to Tehran) being what they are. )

An Iranian attack (atomic) upon America MIGHT even trigger retaliation from Jerusalem — if Barry Soetoro stays true to his Muslim marriage ring.

Yes his college/ marriage ring is holds a highly stylized, compressed, ode to Islam. (!)

That’s SOME Christian we have there!

As always, I’d recommend reading all of Caroline Glick’s column. Here’s the link http://carolineglick.com/iran-obama-boehner-and-netanyahu/

Perhaps I should have said more than just “a wiser man than Mr. Obama”. But I think we agree that, had Mr. Obama been able to admit to mistakes and correct them, a great many things would be different.

My guess is that we’d also agree that, were Mr. Obama a wiser man, he might well have kept the kid gloves on for a while. By dropping the mask immediately, he has served the Republicans notice that no quarter would be given — and Mr. Boehner has taken up the challenge.

He might have gotten a few months of concessions out of the Republicans. (He might get them anyway.) But he chose to get out the long knives right away… not a very smart move on his part.

Then again, I’ve never accepted the Valerie Jarrett thesis that Barack Obama is so much smarter than the rest of us.

Well put, sir!

Of course, we get into trouble when we get into specifics. What anathema consequences would result in fewer terrorist attacks?

Israel was able, in years past, to identify certain tactics that the terrorists hated passionately, and made a point of using those tactics in response to terror attacks. This was successful, for a while. (One such tactic was to identify the terrorists responsible, and to destroy their family homes. Another was to establish a new community — what our press calls a “settlement” — on the site of the terror attack. This latter action, often, was actually spontaneous; the Israeli government merely stayed out of the way.)

But my question would be — what would it take to curb terrorism, by making the costs of terrorism unacceptable to the terrorists? And would that cost be one we are willing to demand?

That, of course, is part of what the terrorists are counting on — that we will not have the stomach to do what is needed to stop them.

I dont lnow if you came accross the words of one senior staff with Iran regime in 2003 when publicly said that iran helpd US in Afghanistan and Iraq, let not forgot the iraqi pro Iraninan govemet with top leders from JaAfry, Malik even Alabadi all are tials for iran while US talking them on borfe , most importantly US well knew The Shadow Commander in iraq while he is most wanted head by US
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/09/30/the-shadow-commander

Youneed to follow the dots to find more in this matter, i suggest reador about Iran contra woepem deal also dinner with siayd Thomas Friedman in NYT in 2004

I wonder if they can be peeled away under certain circumstances? They wouldn’t miss anything except their own chains.