Comments on: Obama’s non-solidarity

By: Tara

Tara — Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:49:15 +0000

I wish some intrepid journalist would ask Obama one question, on camera:

“Do you think the people should have a right to mock or deride major religious figures?”

I’d like to see him try to give an answer that subtly conveys the difference between the wholly reprehensible act of mocking the prophet Mohammed and the perfectly understandable act of mocking Jesus/the Christian God.

By: John Dough

John Dough — Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:00:56 +0000

Some forget that this was a march of the leaders of the world. Maybe Obama wasn’t asked since they don’t consider him a leader.

By: Maquis

Maquis — Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:52:30 +0000

Neo: “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

Actually, he said “The future MUST NOT belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

He’s hard at work ensuring that is so.

By: Retail Lawyer

Retail Lawyer — Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:20:03 +0000

Perhaps this a rare bit of honesty from Obama. He is simply not in agreement with the others at the event.

By: Matthew M

Matthew M — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:58:31 +0000

It is depressing to think about the Herculean task it will be for a post-Obama administration to fumigate the federal bureaucracies that were so assiduously stuffed with leftists. The FBI extirpated all reference to Islamic terrorism. Ditto Department of Defense. Justice Department that insists on kangaroo courts in the universities and stamps out voter ID programs in the states. Etc, etc, etc. Would Jeb Bush or Mitt Romney pare back the federal leviathan?
And that is presuming they can even win in 2016. Would either throw back in democrats’ faces the specious projections, such as the war on women? Would they run campaign ads with soundbites of Hillary’s dismal Benghazi performance or her cackling about getting a rapist off? Or is Karl Rove sending anti-abortion mailers to the right mixture of red state voters our best hope for dragging a Republican candidate across the 270 electoral vote threshold?

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:46:01 +0000

Case in point is the ISIS issue. He didn’t do anything until he felt he had no other option.

ISIS’ funding and training came from Hussein. Is that something people still don’t know about?

By: parker

parker — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:32:55 +0000

There is a simple explanation for bho’s refusal to link terrorism with islam. From labeling the Fort Hood massacre work place violence to his many statements exulting islam to his UN speech about slandering the prophet it is clear that he is at minimum ambivalent about jihad or an actual sympathizer.

By: jack

jack — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:08:23 +0000

Let’s face the facts …

This is not something that O cares about!

On issues like this he will only respond when pushed to the edge of a political cliff.

Case in point is the ISIS issue. He didn’t do anything until he felt he had no other option.

By: KLSmith

KLSmith — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:09:06 +0000

Although it is true that Obama doesn’t care about our right to free speech, I don’t believe it was anything as lofty as that that kept him home. Quite simply, the only thing other than campaigning for himself that Obama enjoys is sports. There is no way he was going to miss the NFL playoffs yesterday.

By: Artfldgr

Artfldgr — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:04:27 +0000

“As the camel falls to its knees, more knives are drawn”