Comments on: Ugly outfits are not all alike

By: Jack

Jack — Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:59:46 +0000

I will immediately seize your rss feed as I can’t to find your email subscription hyperlink or newsletter
service. Do you’ve any? Kindly allow me recognize in order that I may
subscribe. Thanks.

By: BillR

BillR — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:20:36 +0000

Artfldgr,
Neo’s use of these images falls clearly within several Fair Use exceptions of US and international copyright law. Your accusation of theft lacks such protection, and is libel. Apologize. Now.

By: Artfldgr

Artfldgr — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:05:14 +0000

Glad you paid the photographers (like me) for using their shots… right? nope… just steal them like everyone else does… (you can see my stuff all over, but no money comes to me!!!!)

By: Artfldgr

Artfldgr — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:03:55 +0000

First, there’s the color, a yellow that almost no one can wear successfully with the possible exception of redheads

looks like someone is peeling back a bannana to see the bruised contents…

too bad i am not gay, i would have a career being a biatch commenting on fashion… heh

By: Artfldgr

Artfldgr — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:02:04 +0000

did you see Dunhams dress? i am amazed neo did not put that on the wacko dress list…

feminism… bring out your inner female wacko while trying to act out the worst qualities of men…

if it werent for feminism T&A would not be so prevalent
neither would camel toes, women dressing like barbarella/peter pan/rum bottle pirates…

By: GRA

GRA — Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:19:26 +0000

Neo, have you seen the 72nd Golden Globe red carpet dresses? My absolute favorite, just overall, was Jessica Chastain.

By: Ray

Ray — Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:48:44 +0000

The first outfit looks too small for the model and the second looks too big. The third one looks like somebody cut off the top of a one piece suit.

By: Sam L.

Sam L. — Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:32:08 +0000

#1 is not flattering, and clearly the one wearing it doesn’t flatter it.

#2: Nolanimrod says it well.

#3: Ah yes, I remember it well.

By: Richard Aubrey

Richard Aubrey — Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:57:27 +0000

Women, those with sufficient resources, have been trying to dress well for thousands of years. It would be silly to think there is anything yet undone which would improve on the efforts of…thousands of years.
The upper-class Roman gowns, for example, are classic and can show as much or as little–that’s what imaginations are for–as the wearer desires.
What’s left is outrage to epater les bourgeois and get some ink. And, due to the regression to the mean (classic themes) of clothing which normal women require, the New Thing can only be outrageous and ugly. All the good-looking stuff has been (sniff) done.

By: LindaF

LindaF — Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:52:22 +0000

The third picture shows a really well-shaped woman who would NEVER be a model today – too “fat”.

Fake boobs have truly distorted the understanding of the female body. If a woman diets too strenuously, she will lose her secondary characteristics. However, today, models diet until they look like a pre-teen boy, then have a surgeon slap on the fake boobs, and – voila! – today’s model – the Boy with Boobs.

But, NO-O-O-O, the gay designers, dressers, and other fashion hangers-on, they don’t want a teen-age boy!

Right.