Structural limitation. The difference between a law enforcement approach to terrorism and a counter-terrorism approach to terrorism is the difference between prosecution and prevention.

A succinct explanation is provided here by a retired CSIS agent (Canadian equivalent of the CIA) who investigated the 1985 Air India 182 attack:
http://youtu.be/yS_4ZNa1ByI?t=16m30s

Like the Paris attack, the Air India 182 perpetrators were known and under surveillance.

The whole documentary (1:30 long) provides useful insight on the difficulty of counter-terrorism, more so the law enforcement approach to counter-terrorism.

The way the Left works is via infiltration, at best, and slaughter via totalitarian force later. So all it takes is that the leaders be corrupted. The people may just be clueless, they don’t actually matter much in the strategic level.

Currently the Left has almost total control of the police unions, the teacher’s unions, and so forth. There was the AFL CIO merge, I believe, which appointed certain new leaders. Those new leaders were Leftists, primarily. It took some years for them to get the police departments militarized, corrupt, and more incompetent, with the help of DHS, so the solution is ongoing for control.

It will only get harder to enforce law and order, because the Left plays both sides of the fence. They support the criminals in order to obtain a pretext to control the police forces. They make the police forces crush the insurgents, in order to promote more criminal passion. They benefit from such. The same strategy is used with Islam, they promote Islamic violence and then use the backlash to stomp down on Christians and Jews.

This makes it harder to enforce law and order.

The Gaystapo, another Leftist faction, goes around looking for baker discrimination against gay weddings. IN order to heighten the differences and freeze people personally, so that they take damage.

Yes, I realize the left would be completely against my suggestions. But the left is not the majority in this country—not yet, anyway.

10% of the French are Muslim. And 60% of the jailed in France are Muslim. Finishing school.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/m6e2c3b

Guess we can stop it with the claims that each of the attacks are just crazed lone wolves.

It’s by a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute and worth a read. It basically says the answer isn’t clear-cut. One thing that struck me was this:

We might also ask whether French authorities and their foreign counterparts, especially those in Yemen and the US, shared intelligence that might, taken together, have thrown up insight that the individual portions could not.

One report suggests that France de-prioritised the Kouachi brothers because Yemen was a US priority, whereas American officials left it to the French. France, it should be remembered, is not a member of the US-led Five Eyes intelligence alliance.

That sounds so pre-9/11. Very worrisome.